Remove this Banner Ad

No Oppo Supporters CAS hands down guilty verdict - Players appealing - Dank shot - no opposition - (cont in pt.2)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Doss
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Dan Cooper said:
He could always play the ..... "if I had my time again" ......card if he chose to.

Has Robbo provided a decent reason yet why he did publish the names?
Click to expand...


He's being too coy about it. The reason he published was because he can and he just doesn't want to say it.
 
rumply said:
Reckon he was just backing his mate up. Plenty of others passed on the op to go with that story, says a bit.
Click to expand...



I'd want to know the conditions on which the report was leaked before giving the rest of the industry too much credit.

Given that the AFL leaked (probably the whole report) to Fairfax it is likely that the leak was on the condition that the players were protected meaning that Fairfax was not in a position to use the players names. Say what you want about the AFL but it did act to protect the players it knew the club had let down (or that's what it thought it was doing).

I don't believe that Essendon/Hird would not have required the same condition if we leaked the interim report to the Sun (not that I believe that we'd want anyone to see that report).
 
BrunoV said:
He's being too coy about it. The reason he published was because he can and he just doesn't want to say it.
Click to expand...

Robbo's employer measures his performance by how many newspapers they sell - pure and simple - even if Robbo would have you believe things like discretion and ethics apply.
 
Last edited:
BrunoV said:
I'd want to know the conditions on which the report was leaked before giving the rest of the industry too much credit.

Given that the AFL leaked (probably the whole report) to Fairfax it is likely that the leak was on the condition that the players were protected meaning that Fairfax was not in a position to use the players names. Say what you want about the AFL but it did act to protect the players it knew the club had let down (or that's what it thought it was doing).

I don't believe that Essendon/Hird would not have required the same condition if we leaked the interim report to the Sun (not that I believe that we'd want anyone to see that report).
Click to expand...


Don't see why that is likely as I think the shoulder shrug from that AFL regards the leak & publication of names tells everyone all they need to know about how much the AFL 'cares' at this point.

For all we know Robbo's source could be the bin he was rummaging through when lo & behold he found a copy of the interim report (along with half a hot dog & 2 winnie blue butts) - god knows it appears there were/are enough copies of the ****ing thing floating about for this to have happened.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

TD said:
In which case they couldn't be charged for taking it at all. It is either S0 or nothing.
Click to expand...
Yeah, that was the line Dank was taking when he asked specifically if AOD was banned under S2 because he probably thought/knew that if it wasn't he'd be able to use it.
 
How would they prove what the burrito juice was if it was an unlabelled bottle with no paper trail? For all ASADA know it was actually burrito juice and not some potent combination of steroids.
 
I now wait for things to happen and the response those things draw! When it's over, I'm thinking it won't be over. Know wot I mean?
 
JayDon said:
I now wait for things to happen and the response those things draw! When it's over, I'm thinking it won't be over. Know wot I mean?
Click to expand...
 
ChilbroSwaggins said:
How would they prove what the burrito juice was if it was an unlabelled bottle with no paper trail? For all ASADA know it was actually burrito juice and not some potent combination of steroids.
Click to expand...
Has there ever been any accusation that what was administered was illegal? I think it was meant to represent the haphazard, reckless and dangerous nature of our supplements program.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
flintandtas said:
Has any reporter actually said they had the information prior and didn't go with the story? While I think we all assume that Caro has read the report, do we know for sure that it was the full report or did it have the names blacked out?
Click to expand...
Apparently about 50 people had non redacted versions of the interim report, if this is true I would like to know why the official status of aod9604 in 2011 has not been leaked.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
DaSameOlds1871 said:
Apparently about 50 people had non redacted versions of the interim report, if this is true I would like to know why the official status of aod9604 in 2011 has not been leaked.
Click to expand...

Why so many copies. But in any case, if there were 50 distributed one of those recipients leaked the information. If the AFL or ASADA actually gave a rats toss bag they could work their way through the 50 and work out who the snitch is.
 
Dan Cooper said:
Why so many copies. But in any case, if there were 50 distributed one of those recipients leaked the information. If the AFL or ASADA actually gave a rats toss bag they could work their way through the 50 and work out who the snitch is.
Click to expand...
Richard Ings said in the vicinity of 50. Robbo reckons he hasn't seen it, Tony Sheahan reckons he has, so if that no name has seen it I'm guessing it's freely available.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 

Remove this Banner Ad

AD's hard sell on the Adelaide Oval is a joke. Clutching at straws...useless. That was his big sell apart from appealing to the fairer sex! Damn. Is it only me or is he trying to get off scott free??? Maybe he is trying to soften the blow of the federal Court which he should receive!!!
 
Jab said:
I look forward to it. I hope that he does it in a respectful manner that isn't designed to glorify himself or boost his own profile.

Are you mates of his?
Click to expand...
Yeah man. Known him since 83.
Good guy, can tend to get a little over passionate.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

NAB777 said:
Yeah man. Known him since 83.
Good guy, can tend to get a little over passionate.
Click to expand...

If he didn't use the information that he gets to big note himself then I'd be a lot less annoyed with him. He's not the only person who gets inside information from being friends with people at the club, or for being involved with the club.

Edit: I know him too.
 
Jab said:
If he didn't use the information that he gets to big note himself then I'd be a lot less annoyed with him. He's not the only person who gets inside information from being friends with people at the club, or for being involved with the club.

Edit: I know him too.
Click to expand...

Fair enough. Not everyone's cup of tea.

Then you'd know what a rough time he has had lately.
 
Whils papers are in investigative mode why don't they name the 11 other clubs. Dr Larkins (yes he's a knob) said at the tiem that report was released that 3 other clubs had used "extensive needle programs". Wouldn't a journo be even slightly curious? Strange.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Similar threads

RedmanWasHere
    • Like
Delisted 47: Oskar Smartt - Delisted as of 22/09/25
5 6 7 8 9
Replies
211
Views
16K
DERO
DERO

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom