Workshop 2015 AFL Jumper Ideas

[wing it]

Still. If Hawthorn wore white shorts against GWS in the full home, I'm convinced there'd be more than an adequate contrast between the two sides.

100%

 

[hitthepost]

Still. If Hawthorn wore white shorts against GWS in the full home, I'm convinced there'd be more than an adequate contrast between the two sides.

Nah, not when the whole back of one team is orange and the other is gold. A whole side of one jumper is almost the same colour as nearly the whole of the other.

Though when you apply the Collingwood/Carlton/Essendon/Richmond clash rules, I guess it works

 

[wing it]

Nah, not when the whole back of one team is orange and the other is gold. A whole side of one jumper is almost the same colour as nearly the whole of the other.

Though when you apply the Collingwood/Carlton/Essendon/Richmond clash rules, I guess it works

Sorry hitthepost, I disagree mate. Orange and yellow are very distinguishable.

 

[Bryce_Jersey17]

Nah, not when the whole back of one team is orange and the other is gold. A whole side of one jumper is almost the same colour as nearly the whole of the other.

Though when you apply the Collingwood/Carlton/Essendon/Richmond clash rules, I guess it works

Look at GWS vs Sydney though. Both teams lay in their full home kits all the time against one another

 

[akkaps]

Guys, check the board page for the New Jumpers of 2015 thread.

 

[undefined]

Look at GWS vs Sydney though. Both teams lay in their full home kits all the time against one another

They don't clash, but my word is that an annoying matchup visually.

 

[hitthepost]

I know it's a closeup and a still and all that. But the whole back of GWS's jumper is the same colour as that yoke.
If clash jumpers are there to stop teams wearing similar-coloured kits, then that's gotta be one.

 

[Bryce_Jersey17]

They don't clash, but my word is that an annoying matchup visually.

Ive been to most of the Battle for the Bridges, and they come quite close to clashing.

 

[wing it]

I know it's a closeup and a still and all that. But the whole back of GWS's jumper is the same colour as that yoke.
If clash jumpers are there to stop teams wearing similar-coloured kits, then that's gotta be one.

It is quite a light orange. Maybe a deeper orange needed?

 

[undefined]

I know it's a closeup and a still and all that. But the whole back of GWS's jumper is the same colour as that yoke.
If clash jumpers are there to stop teams wearing similar-coloured kits, then that's gotta be one.

UGH, I understand why the AFL would want to play it safe.

Plus, it's an interstate away game for both teams, so it's the norm to don an alternate strip.

 

[Klim]

I do what I want.

Rebel.

 

[hitthepost]

I'm all for:
Red/Maroon/Orange clash
Orange/Gold/Yellow clash
Black/Navy/Purple clash
Navy/Purple/Royal clash
Maroon/Navy clash

Any colour that comprises more than 25% of a jumper is a "major colour" and if the away team's jumper has a shared major colour with the home team's jumper then you need a clash.

 

[wing it]

Nah, not when the whole back of one team is orange and the other is gold. A whole side of one jumper is almost the same colour as nearly the whole of the other.

Though when you apply the Collingwood/Carlton/Essendon/Richmond clash rules, I guess it works

Those clashes annoy the hell out of me. Particularly Collingwood who never seem to wear their original design in Melbourne anymore

 

[hitthepost]

UGH, I understand why the AFL would want to play it safe.

Plus, it's an interstate away game for both teams, so it's the norm to don an alternate strip.

Unless it's at the MCG like this year (albeit Indigenous Round) or Hawthorn's eventual first-ever trip to Sydney Showgrounds in the year 3120.

BTW, That picture was for a Hawthorn home game. They sell them to Launceston. Their name is first on the matchup. They get the advertising rights of a home team.

 

[hitthepost]

Those clashes annoy the hell out of me. Particularly Collingwood who never seem to wear their original design in Melbourne anymore

If you made your original guernsey your clash top, and decided to claim your new guernsey as your "traditional guernsey" and consider clash tops to me "dress-up", you wouldn't wear your original guernsey either.

 

[Jack Stevens]

There isn't a clash between Hawthorn and GWS, you can tell who's who, it just looks like crap.

 

[hitthepost]

Looks crap because the colours are heaps close.

 

[rabbitoh21]

This isn't as much of a guernsey idea for 2015 rather than just testing my template, but I like how it came out so I put some Port logos and sponsors on it...

 

[hitthepost]

Actually looks pretty good...number panel homage and all!

 

[SgtSchulz]

Various experiments.

Perfection.

Initially I wasn't a fan of the panel on the Bib but I'm starting to really really like it.

Another one of my favourites.

Inverse actually goes alright.

The white + teal combo goes alright too.

 

[akkaps]

The PB jumper does not work without the back number panel.

 

[SgtSchulz]

The PB jumper does not work without the back number panel.

Worked alright in 1914

 

[SgtSchulz]

The PB jumper does not work without the back number panel.

But yeah, the panel is Port Adelaide.

 

[Dylan8]

This isn't as much of a guernsey idea for 2015 rather than just testing my template, but I like how it came out so I put some Port logos and sponsors on it...View attachment 81825

Footscray Power?

 

[hitthepost]

Prison Bar inverse (which Port should wear away vs South/Norwood/Glenelg/West) could still have a number panel, but it would look a bit silly, but it could give an homage to the number panel: