Any chance mick will fly to bail to talk to jaksch like everitt last year![]()
If he does I hope he doesn't take a boogie board.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Any chance mick will fly to bail to talk to jaksch like everitt last year![]()
In 3 weeks when trade period is actually finished and if we only get Jones, then yes you can think it is a bit of a failure. However, I highly doubt this would be the case.If we've targeted a KPP this trade period - which it seems we have given links to Jaksch, Jones, small ties with Membrey etc. - then would it be considered a slight failure to only nab Liam Jones?
68 career goals in five years and only 10 games last year... Hardly an upgrade on what we have.
Heresay or fact?Think Buttifant may enjoy that.
Fortunately a lot of his work has been made somewhat easier in recent weeks as some of the worst trainers are no longer/will no longer be, with us.
I think that 26 is an accurate reflection of the fall in value of a 2nd year player who has played less than 10 games.It is a matter of what he's worth to us and if we do go to auction, things can also change.
Jaksch is back on Sunday and I expect we'll hear about his preferred destination soon after................being us.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Just reiterating what was supposedly 'reported' (speculated rather) from Channel 7. For what its worth - this is all just wishful thinking. I'd say band 5 (around pick 44) would be best we could hope for.27 as a compo for waite ? really ?
We should get him to do a mini preseason at Collingwood given how unfit the new fitness guy said they were under Butters. Strange how an unfit side could win a premiership a couple of year before.Think Buttifant may enjoy that.
Fortunately a lot of his work has been made somewhat easier in recent weeks as some of the worst trainers are no longer/will no longer be, with us.
We were desperately bad at that point and he was our only player who could hold down a kp player without getting entirely squashed.Really?
I can't imagine why you'd waste a list spot on a player that clearly wants out.
If they wanted a player, I'd rather swap Lucas tbh... just think Robbo (100+ games and a Best 22 player like it or not) has more value than Jones (66 gamer that hasn't really played that many good games and is outside their 22).Robbo for Jones
Robbo for Jones
Can't see us trading Robbo for Jones if MS3 was right about being offered 3 rd rounders already. & hoping for a 2nd. We need as many picks as possible in the top 40.
He's a promising tall that plays both ends of the ground who was behind Cameron, Boyd, Patton at GWS.
Where is your cynicism coming from?
Sorry?You still don't know the difference![]()
Sorry?
I agree J, that was a victory of sorts when victories were not our forte.We stood firm on Thornton and if faced with the situation again I would hope we'd do the same.
Perhaps if we were in a stronger position as a club we'd have entertained the trade but looking at our options we really had no choice.
Thornton had his detractors but he just about held a defense together by himself which is no mean feat, particularly when that wasn't the position most suited to him when he joined the club.
Who plays KPD if we get rid of Thornton when the Hawks come knocking? In 2006 (Hawthorn came to us at the end of that season) we had Bower, Livingston, Setanta, Saddington, Teague, Waite and Whitnall on the senior list, and Flint on the rookie list, as alternatives to Thornton. One glance at that list of names is all it takes for me to be very comfortable with the club's decision not to acquiesce to Hawthorn's request of a 2nd and 3rd round pick.
We were comfortable letting Thornton go for the right price, and the Hawks named their price. The two were quite different, the clubs were unable to meet somewhere in between, so Thornton stayed a Blue.
Really?
I can't imagine why you'd waste a list spot on a player that clearly wants out.
You still don't know the difference between hearsay and fact