Remove this Banner Ad

No Oppo Supporters CAS hands down guilty verdict - Players appealing - Dank shot - no opposition - (cont in pt.2)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Doss
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
ASADA have to (should) provide all reverent evidence to the players lawyers..



Their statement of grounds can be set up as they see fit, but they should hand over all relivent evidence they have to do with the investigation, whether it supports their case or not. Because essentially ASADA have more power (well, most govt departments) to gain evidence than a private citizen

True

If their case is so strong Asada should have no hesitations to hand over all the evidence.
 
What i find rather amusing is how people say "Essendon will be fine they can fill their squad with their VFL players" How can that be possible? it means that those VFL players will have to play 2 games a week and also what if the reserves side plays on the same day as the seniors.

It really annoys me how they make it sound so simple to fill a squad with 20 players who are established players mind you.

Not sure if serious.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Oh well, the feline is out of the bag anyway.

Not that it's a massive surprise really- if he's right that is. There was always a suspicion among some that there was something fishy with Sarah. Although, getting back to the whole discussion of people who claim inside sources, I'd question how he, as far as we know just a decent law student who likes a court case or two, would know the real identity.

It's just more amusing how little acknowledgement it would have got had he kept it up there.

"doesn't matter if real, it was the truth", furrows Jon.
 
I'd question how he, as far as we know just a decent law student who likes a court case or two, would know the real identity.

A lot are claiming to have 'the source' - why not him, I guess.

Being twitter famous, he does have a lot of connections of people who 'could know things'. But to be honest, I don't envy his position. Like us, he would have a pile of information to sift through to sort the clean from the dirty. Being fed by Ings, Red Sash and others - there's going to be lots of dirty.
 
strange tweet from him as hes been one of the better people on the saga.

If he has information sarah was fabricated then any honest and decent individual should share with the appropriate people
Depends what he's got to lose or who he pisses off by disclosing it, I suppose.

Which feline is that? The tweet is gone.
Kaias intimated he knew (or at least believes) that Sarah was not a EFC player's mother and that he actually knows the real identity. But, as kelvin said, he didn't divulge who. And then deleted the tweet. Heh.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

tInuw.jpg
 
Depends what he's got to lose or who he pisses off by disclosing it, I suppose.

Kaias intimated he knew (or at least believes) that Sarah was not a EFC player's mother and that he actually knows the real identity. But, as kelvin said, he didn't divulge who. And then deleted the tweet. Heh.
Sit Tight, Be confident

XD

:X

B81upH-CUAEA690.jpg
 
Makes perfect sense for the players, not to be play any official games until a final decision is made by the Anti-Doping Tribunal - Gets tricky if the decision is delayed until say the end of April - Players are found not guilty and then they have missed games for no reason - i've already written off 2015.
 
A High Court appeal is irrelevant - Even if Hird is granted leave, wins his appeal, this will take us through to well into the second half of the year - It won't help players if they are suspended.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

which would be all evidence collected by asada, not interviews where the players lawyers were present. Do ASADA lawfully need to provide players with all evidence? If so this should have been pursued by their legal team


Again, if their testimonies are ruled inadmissible whats to stop them re-interviewing players and doing the same thing again? The players lawyers were present so they can testify that the players testimonies have been somehow distorted, if that is what happened

Because the next lot of interviews would get silence from all players.
 
strange tweet from him as hes been one of the better people on the saga.

If he has information sarah was fabricated then any honest and decent individual should share with the appropriate people

Been through this many times - People have too much to lose if they reveal Sarah's identity - Could lose their jobs, money,friends etc.

There is a chance in the future that a 'Maverick' may release the information, through an underground paper/website and the main media will follow up - I guess this is 50/50 to happen in the future.
 
Fortunately, or unfortunately, I think the media is now quite gun shy that the case is getting towards the pointy end.

Over the journey, we've had stories of the ilk of "Hird's getting sacked" and the likes being shoved onto radio, TV and the broadsheets, where basically journos trying to cover themselves in glory in getting the scoop. I feel now, that with all the litigation flying around, that the media bunker has been told to not pull the trigger unless it's been absolutely proven. My gut feel now is that all senior writers, presenters and cadets are quivering with anticipation of scripting the next chapter - but are spending their time 'getting their ducks in a row' before clicking on the send button to get things active.

Only the most senior and bravest journos are the ones that are still publishing articles on the subject - but in some forcefield/kryptonite type fashion, it seems that if you add somewhere inside the article that it's "my opinion" that all the legal ramifications ****** into the air and no responsibility is ever recorded.

From my answer, you can see where I sit with the media right now.

I understand what you mean and agree with you.

I'm seated right next to you re the media.

But I still can't help but think th
Makes perfect sense for the players, not to be play any official games until a final decision is made by the Anti-Doping Tribunal - Gets tricky if the decision is delayed until say the end of April - Players are found not guilty and then they have missed games for no reason - i've already written off 2015.
Already written off 2015? Please
 
If the players knew exactly what was being injected into them and can recall thymosin beta-4 by name, didn't bother independently asking Doc Reid about it or looking it up on the ASADA site, then lied about it in their interviews, then they probably deserved to get banned for pure stupidity to be honest.

I give people like Jobe Watson, Dustin Fletcher and David Hille more credit than that though.

If the players knew they got tb4 and have been advised to lie in attempt to get off they deserve everything thats happened the past two years. Along with the club for advising them to lie. Id want 2 year bans in this case and those at the club who lied to us and advised the players to try and lie I want them put on display and publicly humiliated.

I dont believe that is what has happened but nothing would surprise me anymore. Ahh well not long until this is over.
 
Minimum 12 months to get a high court case heard? When will Hirdy officially announce it?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom