Remove this Banner Ad

No Oppo Supporters CAS hands down guilty verdict - Players appealing - Dank shot - no opposition - (cont in pt.2)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Doss
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Life has been much sweeter over the last couple of weeks by listening to very little media regarding asaga - dank & mcd are strangely becoming 2 peas in a pod by both being as boring & irrelevant as each other

They are 27 days away from being totally irrelevant.
 
Did he allude in any shape or form as to whether ASADA might be appealing the tribunal decision or not?
He said that he has relied on 'strong legal advice' throughout the entire saga (arse covering?) and that with the Easter break things have been busy (bit like I have only been in the job a few weeks, haven't read the full report and don't know the burden of proof required but I am going to issue SCNs anyway) and he is currently waiting on legal advice before deciding whether to appeal. Then he went onto to say something about Dank admitting he had administered TB4 in the McKenzie interview. Whether he decides to appeal or not, he is heavily pushing 'they did it, we just can't prove it line' to limit the fallout. The interviewer was gushing in his praise for BM, how he has managed the saga and ASADA. At one stage he almost read out BM's resume (with BM filling in bits he had missed out LOL), a bit like BM did in his 50 minute 'appealing is a live option' debacle after the verdict. BM seemed chuffed that at last someone recognised him as the superman we all know he is.

P.S. FFS, I think the interviewer even brought up Lance Armstrong
 
Last edited:
He said that he has relied on 'strong legal advice' throughout the entire saga (arse covering?) and that with the Easter break things have been busy (bit like I have only been in the job a few weeks, haven't read the full report and don't know the burden of proof required but I am going to issue SCNs anyway) and he is currently waiting on legal advice before deciding whether to appeal. Then he went onto to say something about Dank admitting he had administered TB4 in the McKenzie interview. Whether he decides to appeal or not, he is heavily pushing 'they did it, we just can't prove it line' to limit the fallout. The interviewer was gushing in his praise for BM, how he has managed the saga and ASADA. At one stage he almost read out BM's resume, a bit like BM did in his 50 minute 'appealing is a live option' debacle after the verdict. BM seemed chuffed that at last someone viewed him as the superman we all know he is.

P.S. FFS, I think the interviewer even brought up Lance Armstrong

Well the clock is sure ticking if he's awaiting legal advise. Sounds like yet more posturing from McDevitt to me.

McDevitt must have nightmares about Dank. Dank has given interviews and appeared at sportsman's nights while McDevitt continues to fret because Dank has shown no interest whatsoever in talking to him.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

P.S. FFS, I think the interviewer even brought up Lance Armstrong

He did, as well as the obligatory "wont someone think of the children" crap. It was a wank fest of vomit inducing proportions.
 
Yesterday's 2UE interview (PR) was sickening, it managed to make even the Jones/Dank circus look like a meeting of the minds.
For the good of all McDevitt needs to be moved on, he is embarrassing, egotistical, ham fisted, disingenous, unprofessional ........
I should have followed Hird's lead re. not bothering to listen to the guy.
He will insist on only being interviewed by Stuart Bocking from now on after the ball cradling he got yesterday. It was embarrassing
 
Is anyone listening to sen with KB and Brian Waldren ?, Waldren saying that he was happy when we got run over by swans.... because it was good for football with what had gone on previously. Please... Waldron who will go down in history as the Storm ceo who lost them a premiership due to systematic salary cap rorting and has been in exile for the last 3 years. What a HYPOCRITE !!
 
He legitimately said "Dank actually admitted to Thymosin beta 4 (in the Nick Mckenzie interview)"

He also seemed legitimately upset that the reputation of ASADA took such a battering and that it was not fair. A thousand lols

Any time it seems like he's making sense, remember these ****ing weird things he says.

My favourite is still from the early interviews when SCs came out and he says "I want to investigate what Ziggy was talking about when he described a pharmacological experiment - what was the experiment?"
That's right. Ziggy ****ing Switkowski who did not investigate doping at the club - the chief of ASADA wanted to know, after ASADA's 18 month investigation into doping, what Ziggy was talking about are you legitimately ****ing shitting me m8
 
Is anyone listening to sen with KB and Brian Waldren ?, Waldren saying that he was happy when we got run over by swans.... because it was good for football with what had gone on previously. Please... Waldron who will go down in history as the Storm ceo who lost them a premiership due to systematic salary cap rorting and has been in exile for the last 3 years. What a HYPOCRITE !!

Waldon has proven himself to be scum of the lowest order. His opinion shouldn't be sought. Let alone taken seriously. Irreparably damaged goods is Brian Waldron, and nobody knows it better than he does.
 
Last edited:
He did, as well as the obligatory "wont someone think of the children" crap. It was a wank fest of vomit inducing proportions.

Not often there's been balance in this thing. A wank fest with the McDipshit interview, and a wank fest with the Dank interview. Nothing new came out of either.
 
Is anyone listening to sen with KB and Brian Waldren ?, Waldren saying that he was happy when we got run over by swans.... because it was good for football with what had gone on previously. Please... Waldron who will go down in history as the Storm ceo who lost them a premiership due to systematic salary cap rorting and has been in exile for the last 3 years. What a HYPOCRITE !!

I was listening, he was a total flog. You would think he's the last person who should pass moral judgement on another sporting organisation. Seemed to have about the same grasp of the facts as Rebecca Wilson.
 
Just watched the whole interview. Thought Dank spoke well but didn't exactly offer anything hugely substantial. It essentially just reaffirms that the AFL were extremely negligent themselves by not following their own advice and regulations.

I don't exactly think highly of the guy, but Dank has played this very well. I think the manner in which he's approached all of this nonsense, and the patience that he's displayed whilst being publicly whacked from every angle, will ultimately see him be vindicated/rewarded.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Just watched the whole interview. Thought Dank spoke well but didn't exactly offer anything hugely substantial. It essentially just reaffirms that the AFL were extremely negligent themselves by not following their own advice and regulations.

I don't exactly think highly of the guy, but Dank has played this very well. I think the manner in which he's approached all of this nonsense, and the patience that he's displayed whilst being publicly whacked from every angle, will ultimately see him be vindicated/rewarded.

You may well be right.

I like that it was bought up again in the interview how conniving and downright bloody dishonest Gil McLachlan was in asking Andruska to omit stuff from the interim report so as it read the way he wanted it to read.

From memory Alan Jones asked McLachlan about that too, and if memory serves correct Gil just squirmed and deflected. Anything but give a straight answer.

Not forgotten Gil. Never will be ****ing forgotten!
 
Life has been much sweeter over the last couple of weeks by listening to very little media regarding asaga - dank & mcd are strangely becoming 2 peas in a pod by both being as boring & irrelevant as each other
They should have to fight publicly as an official end to the saga.
 
Dank is now saying we destroyed the records on caro paper, even though pretty much anyone who can use a computer knows that deleted files on are computer are never actually deleted.
No, they are not deleted, the pointers are, but they can/will likely be over-written at some stage if the computer is used and thus can be permanently removed.

And do you really think ASADA would be smart enough to get an IT expert in to retrieve lost info?
 
No, they are not deleted, the pointers are, but they can/will likely be over-written at some stage if the computer is used and thus can be permanently removed.

And do you really think ASADA would be smart enough to get an IT expert in to retrieve lost info?

Smart? ASADA? Not based on how they've handled this thing so far.
 
You may well be right.

I like that it was bought up again in the interview how conniving and downright bloody dishonest Gil McLachlan was in asking Andruska to omit stuff from the interim report so as it read the way he wanted it to read.

From memory Alan Jones asked McLachlan about that too, and if memory serves correct Gil just squirmed and deflected. Anything but give a straight answer.

Not forgotten Gil. Never will be ****ing forgotten!
The best thing that Abbott being in power (never thought I woudl ever say that), is that he is an Alan Jones fan and Alan now has ASADA and the AFL in his crosshairs. So hopefully momentum is kept and the push for a inquiry is sustained.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

No, they are not deleted, the pointers are, but they can/will likely be over-written at some stage if the computer is used and thus can be permanently removed.

And do you really think ASADA would be smart enough to get an IT expert in to retrieve lost info?

Yep this.

An analogy to use is to imagine a notebook.

Each page at the top might have a sticker saying that page is in use.

When you delete a page, you remove the sticker (but the content remains on the page).

When you go to write a new page, you start flicking through pages until you find one without a sticker and start writing.

That means you can have some pages that are used (with sticker), some that have no sticker and have the remaining contents completely there and some that have part new contents and part old contents as you haven't written a full page to it yet.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom