Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

2 of those 4 big men he took in the second round (picks 47 and 60) he just swapped for a guard that went at number 8 last year. I'd say that's a pretty good result. And one of the remaining 2 big guys he traded for 2 future second rounders, which can be used either in the draft or as part of trade.
So all up I'd say he did pretty well with all those second rounders.
I'm shocked to be here.i just found out amanda boyd and jason dufner are divorced. and perhaps tiger is the reason.
here's amanda
![]()
I guess if you consider 4.4ppg at 36% a good result I can't argue with that.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
He's going to be very clever and very useful for the right team. 76's have gotten away with highway robbery.I guess if you consider 4.4ppg at 36% a good result I can't argue with that.
There is no other way right now.
Off an achilles? No. This time two years ago before we had invested in two young shooting guards? Yes.Would signing We$ placate the anger?
He's going to be very clever and very useful for the right team. 76's have gotten away with highway robbery.
Take your bland cynicism elsewhere.
He was a rookie in a shambles of a franchise, you bringing up stats is stupid.
Good trade for the 76ers.
I actually wouldnt he surprised if Rondo has a good season next year. He just doesnt fit at the Kings with their lack of shooters
Chuck me in for Dirk aswell pal. peternorth who ended up winning that Dirk vs STAT vs C-Webb debate of the mid 2000s?I'll put you down as voting for Dirk
If Jordan stays with the Clippers could we see an Amare and Dirk starting front court next season? Surely then we can settle the debate
There is a difference between writing off a rookie who barely got a chance and you have no idea about, and a fan venting deserved frustration at a franchise making humiliating mistakes which throws it's direction and identity under the bus for the umpteenth time.Yes, because people can't have opinions on players. Let's all rate all players as wonderful to avoid cynicism.
It is odd though that given your cynical rants in the last few pages you'd chastise others.
Off an achilles? No. This time two years ago before we had invested in two young shooting guards? Yes.
I think he'd be perfect with the Raptors anyway.
as shambolic as Philly was they got more wins than the knicks
i'll see myself out
Well I think he's more likely to turn it around than either of the blokes he was traded for are to even average those numbers. So yeah, I consider it a good result.I guess if you consider 4.4ppg at 36% a good result I can't argue with that.
There is a difference between writing off a rookie who barely got a chance and you have no idea about, and a fan venting deserved frustration at a franchise making humiliating mistakes which throws it's direction and identity under the bus for the umpteenth time.
Be objective.
The big overseeing problem as I see it is that we're not the Warriors (and Wes isn't Iggy, plus his unfortunate injury). What are we exactly aiming for?I like We$ a lot more for you than I do Rondo or Monta - you need a floor spacer, not another ball-dominant shot creator.
Say you sign Wes - that gives you the ability to go small - Collison/McLemore/We$/Rudy/Boogie - or big - Collison/We$/Rudy/WCS/Boogie.
Either way you have at least two or three competent shooters on the floor at all times.
The other factor is that you have three core guys locked in at 2014 prices for the immediate future - Boogie's a steal at his price. You can afford to overpay for someone like We$, although I wouldn't be as bullish about Rondo. In fact I'd wager Boogie's the entire reason that you're doing this - playoffs or bust.
I don't think those pick swaps will ever eventuate either - it's a top-10 protected pick you're paying, a bit like how the Dubs gave Utah two firsts in order to clear room to sign Iggy. You need to make sure you sign an Iggy - to me that's Wes Matthews.
Fair.I am, I never rated him that highly out of college. I have yet to see anything in the NBA to change my mind. Of course if all of a sudden he starts shooting lights out then i'll be happy to change my opinion of him.
I consider him having gone to a shambles of a franchise, so what changes?
Philly are fine, they're collecting some very good assets and they've got some very good building blocks for the future in Noel/Okafor and Embiid if he gets healthy.
Saric is something else they have up there sleeve when he comes over.
If the Lakers don't get a top 3 pick next then Philly also has that coming to them as well.
Hinkie is doing fine IMO.


