Remove this Banner Ad

Roast Rants, off-topic banter, who ignores who & what Greg Williams' relatives know

  • Thread starter Thread starter Big Mart
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I'm happy here thanks but I wouldn't mind genuine responses rather than memes or suggestions of a ban because I proposed something someone else didn't like...

It has been responded to numerous times.

Posters who have been around for a while are a bit tired of this lazy suggestion.

See my response above about why it is not a good idea.

And if you took my quip personally, I suggest you get a tad of perspective.

It isn't our fault you are not up to speed on this thread.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

I'm happy here thanks but I wouldn't mind genuine responses rather than memes or suggestions of a ban because I proposed something someone else didn't like...


Unfortunately for you, there is a bit of history regarding Hickey, some guys are dead set against trading him, and some would if it suited the club.

Having said that, I agree that responses should be civil, and lets face it I think we all want the same thing.

A FRIGGING FLAG.
 
Had coffee with Williams daughter....:rolleyes:
Man, the things she came out with.

Hickey for Easten Wood was the rumour.

Along with...
Big Judis JC and small Judis NF additions.
Talked about some dish called Matho & Rice.

Bless her heart.
 
Saintsational is that way

its actually
arrow-310623_640.png

that way
 
Poor Joffa's head is about to explode

No it isn't you idiot :oops:

I stand by exactly what i posted.

If what stav said is true it would be Hickey looking to move not us just trading him like you wanted.


I am still against trading Hickey.

FFor a start he is a better ruckman than Longer. Also what happens when if Longer goes down with a long term injury?


We have Pierce and Holmes as backup, both whom are greener than a mid june front lawn.

It significantly weakens our list and puts the team at risk. Personally if we HAD to trade a ruckman I would trade Longer,,not sold on him at all.

As for you making this personal. This is not Saintsational, keep it civil or you will get carded.

Sick of these n00b clowns trying to take the thread OT and personalise it.. Peanut
 
Gee stavro#4 you're good at dropping bombs.
What we need to ask ourselves is will Tom Hickey ever be good enough to play a predominantly KPF role and chop out Billy in ruck? If it's no (which I think it is) and we can add another good young mid then we need to pull the trigger. Is Lew Pierce the answer? Maybe, he looks more natural forward of the footy but way too early to tell.
It all comes down to what Tom wants though.
Self praise is faint praise... ;)
 

Remove this Banner Ad

No it isn't you idiot :oops:

I stand by exactly what i posted.

If what stav said is true it would be Hickey looking to move not us just trading him like you wanted.


I am still against trading Hickey.

FFor a start he is a better ruckman than Longer. Also what happens when if Longer goes down with a long term injury?


We have Pierce and Holmes as backup, both whom are greener than a mid june front lawn.

It significantly weakens our list and puts the team at risk. Personally if we HAD to trade a ruckman I would trade Longer,,not sold on him at all.

As for you making this personal. This is not Saintsational, keep it civil or you will get carded.

Sick of these n00b clowns trying to take the thread OT and personalise it.. Peanut

My comment was in regard to your desire to not have Hickey mentioned, nothing to do with you personally.

I wasn't trying to take the thread 'OT', I was just posing a trade I thought was reasonable and you jumped on to criticise me because I didn't bother reading the previous 1000+ pages.

I haven't seen you suggest a ban for anyone else since the Hickey theme has taken off again.

It's a public forum mate, so I'm sorry if I haven't racked up thousands of posts, but I don't see why my comments should be any less relevant than yours, each to their own I guess.

I'm happy to leave it at that but I might suggest maybe take some of your own advice and find some perspective.

Go Saints
 
My comment was in regard to your desire to not have Hickey mentioned, nothing to do with you personally.

I wasn't trying to take the thread 'OT', I was just posing a trade I thought was reasonable and you jumped on to criticise me because I didn't bother reading the previous 1000+ pages.

I haven't seen you suggest a ban for anyone else since the Hickey theme has taken off again.

It's a public forum mate, so I'm sorry if I haven't racked up thousands of posts, but I don't see why my comments should be any less relevant than yours, each to their own I guess.

I'm happy to leave it at that but I might suggest maybe take some of your own advice and find some perspective.

Go Saints

Well maybe you should have read some of the thread.

As for my post about bans, you if took that seriously you really dont understand how this forum works.

Most posters who have been around more than five minutes have seen probably hundreds of posts about trading Hickey.

It has been going on for months.

As for my "head exploding" if Hickey is traded, that is directly taking the thread OT and attemptng to start a flame war.

That might play at Saintsational or where ever the hell you came from but it wont here.

And you dont have to aplogise to me about not racking up post, just dont come on to a thread with ignorance being your only asset.

As for your comments being any less relevant than mine, who said they weren't? I find them worthless and ignorant but you can post what you want even if it is laughable. It is your right to embarrass yourself if you wish.

So there you have it. You can post any ignorant crap you like. You might think your posts are nott irrelevant, however your presence here certtainly is to me. Off you go and dont bother replying.
 
Well maybe you should have read some of the thread.

As for my post about bans, you if took that seriously you really dont understand how this forum works.

Most posters who have been around more than five minutes have seen probably hundreds of posts about trading Hickey.

It has been going on for months.

As for my "head exploding" if Hickey is traded, that is directly taking the thread OT and attemptng to start a flame war.

That might play at Saintsational or where ever the hell you came from but it wont here.

And you dont have to aplogise to me about not racking up post, just dont come on to a thread with ignorance being your only asset.

As for your comments being any less relevant than mine, who said they weren't? I find them worthless and ignorant but you can post what you want even if it is laughable. It is your right to embarrass yourself if you wish.

So there you have it. You can post any ignorant crap you like. You might think your posts are nott irrelevant, however your presence here certtainly is to me. Off you go and dont bother replying.
So your head exploded?
 
Oh dear.

Well maybe you should have read some of the thread.

As for my post about bans, you if took that seriously you really dont understand how this forum works.

Most posters who have been around more than five minutes have seen probably hundreds of posts about trading Hickey.

It has been going on for months.

As for my "head exploding" if Hickey is traded, that is directly taking the thread OT and attemptng to start a flame war.

That might play at Saintsational or where ever the hell you came from but it wont here.

And you dont have to aplogise to me about not racking up post, just dont come on to a thread with ignorance being your only asset.

As for your comments being any less relevant than mine, who said they weren't? I find them worthless and ignorant but you can post what you want even if it is laughable. It is your right to embarrass yourself if you wish.

So there you have it. You can post any ignorant crap you like. You might think your posts are nott irrelevant, however your presence here certtainly is to me. Off you go and dont bother replying.
``````````
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Eli is worth a hell of a lot more to us than what we'd get for him in a trade at the moment. As MG said a few pages back, he did about as well as could be expected coming off that horrible arm break. Will bounce back next year, the fact that people (not you) have written him off already pisses me off a bit to be honest.

Even pre injury the kid hears footsteps every time he goes near the ball.

Sinclair and Lonie showed more ticker in 2 qtrs of AFL football than Templeton has shown in 2 years.

I hope he proves us wrong but it's looks like a premature handout of poor Andrew Thompsons no.4 to me
 
Last edited:
Even pre injury the kid looks over his shoulder every time he goes near the ball.

Sinclair and Lonie showed more ticker in 2 qtrs of AFL football than Templeton has shown in 2 years.

I hope he proves us wrong but it's looks like a premature handout of poor Andrew Thompsons no.4 to me

Oh dear
 
Even pre injury the kid looks over his shoulder every time he goes near the ball.

Sinclair and Lonie showed more ticker in 2 qtrs of AFL football than Templeton has shown in 2 years.

I hope he proves us wrong but it's looks like a premature handout of poor Andrew Thompsons no.4 to me
WOW, very ordinary post imo
 
Even pre injury the kid looks over his shoulder every time he goes near the ball.

Sinclair and Lonie showed more ticker in 2 qtrs of AFL football than Templeton has shown in 2 years.

I hope he proves us wrong but it's looks like a premature handout of poor Andrew Thompsons no.4 to me
Dude, this being your third post and all, might not be the best way to win friends on this board.
 
Even pre injury the kid hears footsteps every time he goes near the ball.

Sinclair and Lonie showed more ticker in 2 qtrs of AFL football than Templeton has shown in 2 years.

I hope he proves us wrong but it's looks like a premature handout of poor Andrew Thompsons no.4 to me

Crikey !!!! :mad:
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom