- Joined
- Oct 2, 2007
- Posts
- 10,176
- Reaction score
- 7,800
- Location
- Essendon
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- Arsenal
If we are found guilty - I would expect that there would have to be a penalty of sorts administered. There's not many arbitrations that I know of who don't have a punishment, when you're found to have broken the rules.
On the other hand, if this makes sense, I would hate for WADA, ASADA or the AFL to come out and get a guilty verdict and administer no penalty; just for the sake of "getting their men". That would piss me off no end - but in a round about way, it would comfortably tie off all the loose ends for the AFL and the Government.
I just can't see, if there is a non guilty verdict, how there can't be a Royal Commission on how things got to where they did. Millions in tax payers money has been wasted on a poorly run case - that needs to be explained in out in the open. This may also portray the AFL in a horrible light with sticking their noses in where it was never meant to be.
AD would just have to be upset that he could no longer be the sitting member for Mooney Ponds.
Wasn't it stated that the AFL will push for no penalty if found guilty due to the delays and mitigating circumstances. And WADA would only be pushing for a few weeks...possibly preseason....




