Very much disagree.
Take for example the "pentagon missile". The people you would need to keep quiet are:
* members of the public who were driving by at the time, who saw the missile but will now need to say for the rest of their lives it was a plane. How many is that? Many reports have that at around 100 or so.
* People that planted the plane debris and other damage consistent with a plane hitting. What you reckon? 10? 20 people to do the job?
* Rescue workers who would have found missile evidence, or at the least, no plane evidence, in the rubble. There were literally thousands of people there for weeks and weeks. How many might have seen incriminating evidence?
* Of course, then there is the missing plane from American Airlines, the missing people from the planes (who's remains were found in the pentagon, which would have needed to have been planted after the fact I guess). Those people boarded a plane that day from an international airport, so that plane, if not crashing into the pentagon, went somewhere? Where? Once they were there, people would have SEEN said plane, and would have needed to be kept quiet about that fact
That'd depend on what the "cover up" actually is. If it's actually a plane that was used, then witnesses wouldn't be the wiser.
There's something more important than money here; it's the life of my loved ones and I. Yeah, I'd stay pretty quiet if someone like the CIA were threatening my family.How much to keep quiet I wonder? What would it cost to keep YOU quiet, Thrawn, on the greatest conspiracy of all time? If it were me, I would make sure me and my family never had to want for anything for the rest of time. So maybe thats...$50m? $100m
Would you think it's hard to siphon money if you had an organisation with the connections and resources to do so? They'd set up and fabricate an entire story for it, just like what drug lords would do (well the ones who haven't been caught).Now i've just come into that massive amount of money. I would need to keep my accountant quiet and not question the fact that his client was working at the pentagon on 9/11, and all of a sudden is a multi millionaire for no good reason. My family and friends...they would need to be quiet too, lest they spill the means on my good fortune. Perhaps we pay them of as well.
Potentially. Could potentially be 50-100 too. Is Jarred Waite a witness?Thats just one person of course, and we are talking about potentially thousands with information that would blow the case wide open.
I'm not sure it's CIA procedure to just randomly ask people to join a special-ops. There'd be a very tight screening process.THen there are those that were asked to be in on the conspiracy, but had a conscience, and said no. What of those people that said, "no thanks, I dont want to be in on this, no matter how much you pay". What of them? Kill them? Pay them off to keep quiet about being asked to keep quiet?
Oprah? No one would take them seriously at all, they'd be a kook in people's eyes. That's assuming someone like Oprah would take it up in the first place.We are talking about billions of hush money, and hoping that no one blows it all on hookers and coke, then decides to cash in with an interview on Oprah. No one gets a messy divorce, and exposes their arsehole ex. No deathbed confessions.
As I said, it depends on what the "cover up" is. I'd agree that the more moving parts, the harder it is to pull off. But what if it's the case of people in the know letting it happen? Then the "thousands of people" bit looks a lot less likely. I still don't think, that even with explosives planted in the building, it would require thousands.Add in the thermite at ground zero, WTC7 getting wired up, The shanksville crash, The rescue workers finding suspicious stuff in the rubble, The reporters "knowing the story in advance", The people who had stock options ahead of time. Family members of the deceased who took fake phone calls from their loved ones. Those that MADE those dodgy phone calls...the list goes on and on and on and on.
You cant compartmentalise something like this. Too big. Too complicated.
Last edited: