Very true and when the oil runs out or we all drive electric cars what then?None.
I suppose we all turn into our version of Israel, but that will end badly for all of the world.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 9
The Golden Ticket - Corporate tickets, functions, Open Air Boxes at the Adelaide Oval, ENGIE, Gabba, MCG, Marvel, Optus & People First Stadiums. Corporate Suites at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Very true and when the oil runs out or we all drive electric cars what then?None.
That's the logical thing to do but the LWNJs call that racism. After all, the rights of people to live here is far more important than the rights of those who already live here to not die from attacks.Countries should not allow immigration of Islamic people. Sad for 95% who are fine but the 5% ruin it for them

That's the typical simplistic and childish response that the LWNJs usually give. If the reason for your question seriously needs to be explained then you have serious issues.Statistically, New Zealanders are more likely to be killed by Australians than Muslims.
So should New Zealand ban Australians from immigrating to New Zealand?
Likewise Australians are more likely to be killed by Australians. So should Australian ban Australians from immigrating to Australia?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Sent from my HTC 2PQ910 using Tapatalk
Has anyone else noticed the absence of the usual left and extreme left posters on this thread? Just look at the frequent posters on the Christchurch thread to see who posted there but not here. S that because it doesn't suit their defence of Islam and their hatred for anything western.?
So Christchurch had nothing to do with white suppremacy?Pity that the bombings had nothing to do with Islam. You're twisting a tradegy to suit your own agenda. Exploiting the deaths of hundreds to score political points.
Sick shit.
Pity that the bombings had nothing to do with Islam. You're twisting a tradegy to suit your own agenda. Exploiting the deaths of hundreds to score political points.
Sick shit.
Reprisal for Christchurch eh...Christians have been attacked by Muslims since before even the battle of Yarmuk (636ad). You see the good Christians of Medina gave refugee to the first Muslim refugee in Mohammed (who was being hunted by the Meccans for miss-deeds) years earlier . He rewarded them by establishing a caravan robbing enterprise and gathering a guerilla army. We have been at war ever since that time.
Let's hope the Sri Lankan Government takes the same approach they applied when confronted with the Tamil insurgency.
Vengance for Christchurch in <5 weeks? Thats pretty damn efficient project management to co-ordinate an attack with this many bombs, targets and suicide bombers.
I just hope the media calls this bullcrap narrative out rather run wild with it and cause further tension and division, which shock horror sounds exactly like something a terrorist organisation might wish for.
“We have seen reports of the statement from the Sri Lankan minister of state for defence, alleging a link between the Easter Sunday terrorist attack and the March 15 attack in Christchurch,” a statement from Ms Ardern’s office said.
“We understand the Sri Lankan investigation into the attack is in its early stages. New Zealand has not yet seen any intelligence upon which such an assessment might be based.
Except, you're incorrect.Has anyone else noticed the absence of the usual left and extreme left posters on this thread? Just look at the frequent posters on the Christchurch thread to see who posted there but not here. S that because it doesn't suit their defence of Islam and their hatred for anything western.?
Vengance for Christchurch in <5 weeks? Thats pretty damn efficient project management to co-ordinate an attack with this many bombs, targets and suicide bombers.
I just hope the media calls this bullcrap narrative out rather run wild with it and cause further tension and division, which shock horror sounds exactly like something a terrorist organisation might wish for.
Well I'm not convinced that's not what the media want.
Reprisal for Christchurch eh...Christians have been attacked by Muslims since before even the battle of Yarmuk (636ad). You see the good Christians of Medina gave refugee to the first Muslim refugee in Mohammed (who was being hunted by the Meccans for miss-deeds) years earlier . He rewarded them by establishing a caravan robbing enterprise and gathering a guerilla army. We have been at war ever since that time.
Let's hope the Sri Lankan Government takes the same approach they applied when confronted with the Tamil insurgency.
The Guardian had a great article mentioning that people of faith need to be protected and highlighted the discrimination and violence against Christians
Its more likely to be fair that they were doing it anyway and it was convenient to blame Christchurch, but at the same time at some later point Christchurch will be a motivating factor. Jacinda should be careful not to turn into the Nev Chamberlain show.
Statistically, New Zealanders are more likely to be killed by Australians than Muslims.
So should New Zealand ban Australians from immigrating to New Zealand?
Likewise Australians are more likely to be killed by Australians. So should Australian ban Australians from immigrating to Australia?
Has anyone else noticed the absence of the usual left and extreme left posters on this thread? Just look at the frequent posters on the Christchurch thread to see who posted there but not here. S that because it doesn't suit their defence of Islam and their hatred for anything western.?

