Bluemour Melting Pot XX - Snark Free Zone

[BrisbaneCFC]

7 could be the number worn, the contract length, the number vacated, the media source which could report the big moves. It’s a lucky number for a BIG trade: Length of deal? Size of player? Nickname . . .

Thanks for narrowing that down for us.LOL

 

[BringBackSimmo]

Why is it Brisbane is so eager to keep Matt Eagles on their list?

It makes no sense to me, he'll be 30 next year and has played all of 4 games..

 

[bmaurizio]

Neither, but Gil owes us for turning Coniglio away.

If not, SOS will find a way to trade one back in.

Yup pretty sure that's the way it goes, just as long as we receive in return a late 1st or early 2nd pick.
Perhaps someone ITK can clarify.

 

[The Flying Doormat]

Both crouch brothers?

5 + 2 = 7

Ollie Wines
Draft pick #7
Played 7 seasons for Port
Birthday 7 October
Wears #16...1+6=7

Yeah, I'm bored.

 

[SickQwon]

7 could be the number worn, the contract length, the number vacated, the media source which could report the big moves. It’s a lucky number for a BIG trade: Length of deal? Size of player? Nickname . . .

We are transferring Tayla Harris to AFL?

 

[ferrisb]

"Latest trade news and rumours Somethings I say will be confirmed Something I will say are personalised opinions"

 

[Funk]

As I've mentioned previously, Crouch actually makes for one of the more plausible targets for us, given our amicable trading history with Adelaide, Brad's desire to move on from that club and our need for another quality mature midfielder.

Let there be a pick swap involved- please, please, please............

 

[rog1995]

fu** my brain just exploded. I'm no good with these scenarios.

Everyone you can rest easy I don't have anything to do with list management!!

Don't think you can trade both a future first and second. Stand to be corrected.

 

[HaydossJ]

And we can afford it, picks wise

How so? 9 is gone and at least our future 2nd is gone for Martin. We don’t have a 2nd this year and won’t get one from Sydney.

 

[La Dispute]

I don’t Crouch is worth more than one first rounder - even if he did win the Adelaide BnF. (Which to be fair didn’t have a strong field this year)

Our first rounder next year, say pick 10, would be correct value given his age and injury history.

 

[carlton_99]

Papley mentioned here as well

 

[BringBackSimmo]

Papley mentioned here as well

What in that, gave any indication that the club is "finding it a lot tougher to snare Sydney's Tom Papley"? Also tougher than what?

 

[carlton_99]

What in that, gave any indication that the club is "finding it a lot tougher to snare Sydney's Tom Papley"?

Nothing at all, but I think overall its clearly easier to get Betts to Carlton then Papley. The biggest thing I took from this is Channel 9's reporter has outstanding facial reactions to everything.

 

[Faz 2000]

What in that, gave any indication that the club is "finding it a lot tougher to snare Sydney's Tom Papley"? Also tougher than what?

The poor little journo fluffed about three of his lines - I’m not sure he’s a reliable judge of what Carlton can and can’t do.

I tell you what we will do - trade in Tom Papley. And that’ll be a great move.

 

[BringBackSimmo]

Nothing at all, but I think overall its clearly easier to get Betts to Carlton then Papley. The biggest thing I took from this is Channel 9's reporter has outstanding facial reactions to everything.

oh definitely, especially the eyebrow action.

 

[Ninja Worrier]

Seven is sette in Italian, we are clearly targetting Setterfield

 

[RoyalParade]

7 could be the number worn, the contract length, the number vacated, the media source which could report the big moves. It’s a lucky number for a BIG trade: Length of deal? Size of player? Nickname . . .

George castanza wanted to call his child Seven.

Close?

 

[slowhand clape]

What about Lachie Henderson?

He’ll be at the Saints next year. Birregurra Saints.

 

[BlueTongue]

Papley talks progressing well. Betts trade is almost too good to be true given how little money the club will have to pay him

One would hope so but trade radio this afternoon said Hawthorn are coming at Papley Hard now with Poppy's future uncertain

There's something big brewing. I'm still confident it involves Gaff (or atleast to that caper of talent). That's what I'm hearing.

Papley and Martin will happen.

Betts will happen for peanuts as early as Monday

I could stand losing Martin if we were to land Gaff, but if the Dawks manage to steal Papley out from under our nose I will have a serious meltdown...

We have more than enough draft currency for Crouch, even with Papley and Martin

Heard from Adelaide's list Manager on SEN yesterday arvo that Matt has committed and going nowhere but he didn't sound as confident on Brad, and didn't sound like he expected to keep him. Kept answering 'see how it plays out' to every player mentioned as a possible trade.

I would love Gaff - even at the expense of Martin (FWIW - before anyone chimes in - I don't think the Brayshaw incident was intentional - in that he probably meant to shove/whack him, but not as high or as hard as he did - just a brain fart I suspect), but he's an outside mid when we really need an in and under type.

 

[bluemahogany]

First official confirmation from our end that Papley has committed to us.

 

[JuddgementDay]

My hunch is Gaff. But, it better be revealed come first thing Monday

 

[RoyalBlues]

George castanza wanted to call his child Seven.

Close?

 

[BringBackSimmo]

First official confirmation from our end that Papley has committed to us.

Cripps is co-captain!

 

[RoyalParade]

Papley mentioned here as well

I love how Clint stanaway talks about it being hard, yet trade period hasn't even begun.

If this is the case then saints are up against it with hill, WCE no chance with Kelly, swans finding it hard with daniher......

****en Muppets

 

[BlueTongue]

What in that, gave any indication that the club is "finding it a lot tougher to snare Sydney's Tom Papley"? Also tougher than what?

For one - I heard Hawthorn are going hard at Papley now ... grrr