Surely most?
Not Jenkins or Crouch.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty AFLW Notice Img
AFLW 2025 - AFLW Trade and Draft - All the player moves
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Surely most?
Many many thanks from horses and humans for sharing info with us '09.We've been confident for a while now that it will get done. This time tomorrow we will all be happy with our weeks work
Dreaming. We would be lucky to talk Giants into letting Caldwell go on his own for future 1st rounder but praying SOS is trying it on.If GWS need bonar off the books and can’t get rid of him, bonar & Caldwell for future 1st
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Jenkins maybe. Crouch certainly no. I think Crows cleared money off books today in other trades to allow for bulking up their contract to make Crouch stay a Crow for good.Not Jenkins or Crouch.
Cutler to Essendon
You can wipe that off the list
Trading phillips will break our 16 year streak of not dealing with Essendon during trade period. Last swap with them was also a ruck, when Matthew Allen went to the bombers.
Fair chance 2 or 3 get there in end.Cutler
Phillips
Bonar?
Trading phillips will break our 16 year streak of not dealing with Essendon during trade period. Last swap with them was also a ruck, when Matthew Allen went to the bombers.
I thought the last trade was camporeale?
Cannot recall but do remember Justin Murphy and Mattew Allan all went there at some point.I thought the last trade was camporeale?
Hence why he be traded for not much. Buyer beware. Hawks are paying more for Patton than we are for Betts.
Patton would be on decent coin and GWS probably making Hawks pay most of it to allow for and the drat pick is of less importance in the trade.
If Hawks were not willing to pay most of Patton current contract , GWS would have asked for higher draft pick.
With Eddie we only got a one year contract with him and I bet SOS talked Eddie management to reduce what he going to be paid next year. Eddie will get less than he was on. Patton management would have not allowed Hawks to reduce his pay like we doing with Betts.
We've been confident for a while now that it will get done. This time tomorrow we will all be happy with our weeks work
Not worth the risk imoI'd take the risk on Bennell….massive upside.
Cost nothing, move him on quick at any sign of trouble.
So Hawks paid the same for Patton as we did for Betts? About time they started getting shafted at the trade table.
Blokes done a knee 3 times, plays at 105 kegs and his primary skill is jumping.
A 50 year old Eddie would kick more goals than General "Soreness" Patton will.
Cannot recall but do remember Justin Murphy and Mattew Allan all went there at some point.
Can someone get around the paywall on the HSun site. Article about us being desperate to get the deals done
Yeah, all made sense when looked at trades that biggest part of negotiations was money and not the picks.Contract is re-done for Patton. Off the books for GWS & extended deal at HFC.
Same as Eddie’s not on his $600K but Adelaide are chipping in on part only.
Trading phillips will break our 16 year streak of not dealing with Essendon during trade period. Last swap with them was also a ruck, when Matthew Allen went to the bombers.
Will look up Allan on trade guru to see what happened.End of 2003, but Allan isn't listed on Wikipedia page?
2003 AFL draft - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org