Climate Change Arguing

Remove this Banner Ad

Power Raid said:
you didn't read al the article did you?

or simply didn't understand it.
Click to expand...
I understood it just fine dude.

Don't pretend you don't know this govt won't go for it , because " take THAT lefty "
That's this s**t govts sole reason for existing.
 
NSWCROW said:
I understood it just fine dude.

Don't pretend you don't know this govt won't go for it , because " take THAT lefty "
That's this s**t govts sole reason for existing.
Click to expand...

take "what" lefty?
 

Log in to remove this ad.

NSWCROW said:
FFS.......

I said this govts sole purpose was to troll the left , what part of it don't you understand ?
Click to expand...
I for one honestly have no understanding as to what a troll is in today's online world.

It seems that if one has a different opinion to another, and they are consistent in their opinion, regardless as to whether they are right or wrong, they are labelled a troll.

I thought you were joking the first time you made your comment, but given you have followed up, there must be an element of seriousness in your question.

You have either lost touch with reality, or were never in touch with it in the first place.
 
Fadge said:
I for one honestly have no understanding as to what a troll is in today's online world.

It seems that if one has a different opinion to another, and they are consistent in their opinion, regardless as to whether they are right or wrong, they are labelled a troll.

I thought you were joking the first time you made your comment, but given you have followed up, there must be an element of seriousness in your question.

You have either lost touch with reality, or were never in touch with it in the first place.
Click to expand...
pro-coal mate ?
 
www.theguardian.com

Q&A recap: business council calls for legislated target of net zero emissions by 2050

Jennifer Westacott, the BCA chief, tells audience Australia should aim to meet 2030 targets without using Kyoto carryover credits
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com


Australia should legislate a target of net zero emissions by 2050, the chief executive of the Business Council of Australia has said.

Appearing on Monday night’s Q&A panel, Jennifer Westacott told the audience “we have to do net zero by 2050”.

Asked if that meant Australia should follow other parliaments such as the United Kingdom and legislate for net zero she said, “I think that would be a start.”>>>>


THOSE CLOSET LEFTIES AT THE AUSTRALIAN BUSINESS COUNCIL SHOULD STAY IN THEIR LANE!!!!
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

kranky al said:
www.theguardian.com

Q&A recap: business council calls for legislated target of net zero emissions by 2050

Jennifer Westacott, the BCA chief, tells audience Australia should aim to meet 2030 targets without using Kyoto carryover credits
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com


Australia should legislate a target of net zero emissions by 2050, the chief executive of the Business Council of Australia has said.

Appearing on Monday night’s Q&A panel, Jennifer Westacott told the audience “we have to do net zero by 2050”.

Asked if that meant Australia should follow other parliaments such as the United Kingdom and legislate for net zero she said, “I think that would be a start.”>>>>


THOSE CLOSET LEFTIES AT THE AUSTRALIAN BUSINESS COUNCIL SHOULD STAY IN THEIR LANE!!!!
Click to expand...

yep and which energy solution actually work in reducing CO2?

Name one jurisdiction on the planet that has adopted a renewables energy policy that has low 14-70g CO2 per kwh, that doesn't rely upon hydro or nuclear? It is time we start holding technologies to account if we are to deliver this target.

Further we should start civil and criminal charges for those spruiking false or misleading representations under current financial regulatory laws.
 
Power Raid said:
yep and which energy solution actually work in reducing CO2?

Name one jurisdiction on the planet that has adopted a renewables energy policy that has low 14-70g CO2 per kwh, that doesn't rely upon hydro or nuclear? It is time we start holding technologies to account if we are to deliver this target.

Further we should start civil and criminal charges for those spruiking false or misleading representations under current financial regulatory laws.
Click to expand...
Spend the money thats spent worldwide on fossil fuel subsides for one year on developing renewables - and we will have our answer
 
kranky al said:
Spend the money thats spent worldwide on fossil fuel subsides for one year on developing renewables - and we will have our answer
Click to expand...

So spend the money on a scheme that has failed to deliver every time, everywhere?

We have our answer, now it’s time for honesty and engineers.....not arm waving, politics and wishes.
 
Power Raid said:
So spend the money on a scheme that has failed to deliver every time, everywhere?

We have our answer, now it’s time for honesty and engineers.....not arm waving, politics and wishes.
Click to expand...
I dont know by what metrics you are going by.

the metrics in my household has our electricity bill slashed to a fraction of what it was and we get to run the ac all day without worrying about the cost.

I have a mixture of solar / wind on my truck and caravan set up and that works a treat too - i spend weeks doing remote jobs and never need ac input.

I would suggest the five trillion we throw at fossil fuel subsidies each year would solve any problems we have fairly quickly.

i mean its not like fossil fuels come problem free is it?

theres pollution issues, gas plant explosions, pipelines breaking down etc etc - yet i dont gear you questioning their cash?

why is there different rules?
 
kranky al said:
I dont know by what metrics you are going by.

the metrics in my household has our electricity bill slashed to a fraction of what it was and we get to run the ac all day without worrying about the cost.

I have a mixture of solar / wind on my truck and caravan set up and that works a treat too - i spend weeks doing remote jobs and never need ac input.

I would suggest the five trillion we throw at fossil fuel subsidies each year would solve any problems we have fairly quickly.

i mean its not like fossil fuels come problem free is it?

theres pollution issues, gas plant explosions, pipelines breaking down etc etc - yet i dont gear you questioning their cash?

why is there different rules?
Click to expand...
And he fact that without input from renewables we wouldn't have enough reliable electricity for the country.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

CakeEater
New Immigration changes
Replies
6
Views
756
Carringbush2010
Carringbush2010
nut
Labors Super changes
11 12 13 14 15
Replies
372
Views
11K
Kwality
K

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top