ferball
desperately terminally-contrarian
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2015
- Posts
- 55,568
- Reaction score
- 120,044
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
They could have ours but apparently he's just a naughty boy.They need a messiah
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

They could have ours but apparently he's just a naughty boy.They need a messiah
Eight weeks is fair, especially if Simpkin misses four from the concussion. WE lost a player to concussion four or five years ago - Ben Jacobs - best tagger in the comp at the time. He never recovered after years of treatment etc.There are also a lot of people that just want an opposition player to get as many weeks as possible regardless of whether it is fair or not.
I doubt all the people wanting to see Webster get an 8 to 10 week suspension would be calling for that if it was one of their own players.
Yeah, I would. Don't care who - Tom Lynch, Dustin Martin, doesn't matter. We have to get serious about concussion. You see kids getting concussions in junior footy and their parents are trying to get their kids to play the following week. The whole sport needs to change its attitude and it starts with the AFL and hopefully filters down.There are also a lot of people that just want an opposition player to get as many weeks as possible regardless of whether it is fair or not.
I doubt all the people wanting to see Webster get an 8 to 10 week suspension would be calling for that if it was one of their own players.
Your reply misunderstood my post, but I agree with everything you have said.Big difference between accidental collisions playing football , and acts where the player has time to choose their actions . This was obviously a choice Webster took. He goes for many weeks or the AFL aren't serious about this stuff and it's pretty obvious they need to be
you get a bump wrong when there is other actions you could have taken, you get lots of weeks . Period
I don't think it should matter if theres head contact or not. if its a reckless act...you're gone for 4 weeks minimum (if no head contact) or 12 weeks with head contact.
They'd stamp a lot of this crap out in no time and they absolutely have to or the AFL will be spending millions & millions on court cases.
Looks whats happening in Rugby..Head contact whether its accidental or not and you're off. They can see whats coming down the tunnel towards them. AfL are just kidding themselves if they don't think the same train is going to hit them.
pretty galling watching this muppet smiling about it at quarter time too
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
The pace and physicality has to change. If the AFL changed its rule and penalized the player causing concussion regardless of intent, the coaches would change tactics and the game would adapt, like it does every time they change a rule. But while the AFL continue to pay lip service bit effectively do nothing, nothing will changeYour reply misunderstood my post, but I agree with everything you have said.
My post was replying to another poster who was saying we need to eliminate all head knocks and concussion, which I was expressing is incredibly difficult with the nature and style of AFL football. The pace and physicality are quite intense compared to most sporting codes.
Your reply misunderstood my post, but I agree with everything you have said.
My post was replying to another poster who was saying we need to eliminate all head knocks and concussion, which I was expressing is incredibly difficult with the nature and style of AFL football. The pace and physicality are quite intense compared to most sporting codes.
Nowhere near as bad.Check out DeGoey on Elijah Hewitt last season.
100% nailed it.Do you Dee supporters only know Pie players?
The same 3 week suspension for a high bump was given out to multiple players last year. Nankervis, Mansell, McAdam, etc etc. How many did your Kozi get?
As a gay guy, I heard it was homophobic, so went to find what was said. While I can’t speak for everyone on the LGBT community, honestly if I heard that I wouldn’t be offended by it & see it as derogatory to me at all. Assuming I’ve found what was said is accurate, if someone said it to me, my response what be “yes exactly & are you offering”Your aware that it was a generic slur because it used to be socially acceptable to make fun of someone by accusing them of being a homosexual right? same reason gay used to be an acceptable term to use to describe something negative, or calling someone you didnt like the f slur.
its no longer socially acceptable to ridicule someone with the shadow of them being a homosexual.
I agree with getting rid of the bump. Don’t think it holds much value or entertainment in todays society. I think all the bump adds is fear and worry with the new medical knowledge we have today.sorry mate..bit of a speed read going on !
But agree you cant eliminate all risk..but let's get rid of the stupid stuff
the league boys got rid of the bump..and haven't really batted an eye since. AFL has to as well
That explains his bizarre never ending defending of Arie, lol.Mate, ChristianBoy, previously Adam H, and The Finger is actually a Saints (extremely) tragic, who sometimes masquerades as a Demons supporter. A very sad case. He’s been trolling Pies threads since early October 2010. Not sure what the connection to that date is.![]()

Webster didn't look offended either. Has anyone asked him?As a gay guy, I heard it was homophobic, so went to find what was said. While I can’t speak for everyone on the LGBT community, honestly if I heard that I wouldn’t be offended by it & see it as derogatory to me at all. Assuming I’ve found what was said is accurate, if someone said it to me, my response what be “yes exactly & are you offering”
If it’s offensive to the gay community logic follows that it should also be offensive to every straight woman as well.
While I don’t like the look of opposition coaches going at other teams players, the blowing (no pun intended) into some homophobic remark I find a bit ridiculous to be honest.
But again I can only talk for myself, others may be offended
Reminds me of the scene in American pie the wedding when stiffler called shit brick a mother ****er. To which he replied yes I am.As a gay guy, I heard it was homophobic, so went to find what was said. While I can’t speak for everyone on the LGBT community, honestly if I heard that I wouldn’t be offended by it & see it as derogatory to me at all. Assuming I’ve found what was said is accurate, if someone said it to me, my response what be “yes exactly & are you offering”
If it’s offensive to the gay community logic follows that it should also be offensive to every straight woman as well.
While I don’t like the look of opposition coaches going at other teams players, the blowing (no pun intended) into some homophobic remark I find a bit ridiculous to be honest.
But again I can only talk for myself, others may be offended
The pace and physicality has to change. If the AFL changed its rule and penalized the player causing concussion regardless of intent, the coaches would change tactics and the game would adapt, like it does every time they change a rule.
Your aware that it was a generic slur because it used to be socially acceptable to make fun of someone by accusing them of being a homosexual right? same reason gay used to be an acceptable term to use to describe something negative, or calling someone you didnt like the f slur.
its no longer socially acceptable to ridicule someone with the shadow of them being a homosexual.
Well saidAt 6 to 8 weeks is he a scape goat? or is it roughly 2 weeks worse than SPP?
Scapegoating inherently implies that there is a large degree of innocence to the person who is assigned as the scapegoat, and they have not done anything wrong. Webster chose to bump and damage Simpkin. He won't be found as innocent and could have chosen not to put himself in the position he now finds himself in.
I dont think ive seen such a blatant (and damaging) head high hit in tecent times that I can recall.
Personally I though SPP would get 5 and this is worth 6 to 8. That's isn't scapegoating, especially if 6 to 8 is the penalty going forward for a similar action.

It's no longer, and has not been for some time, acceptable to be abusive to players and umpires in any lower grades.
Take that sort of talk to any under-age game and you will be banned in no time.
Not a good look from the big league and should be seen to accordingly with the image of the game.
Same way this bump is at least 6 weeks.
Though all these preseason bans will get the AFL pushing for a longer season, less preseason games and more TV, gate and advertising revenue.
8 weeks will have Webster cherry ripe and ready to go for the rest of the season
In the meantime we have plenty of depth to cover