- Sep 10, 2010
- 18,144
- 25,253
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions

I wonder why neither GC nor Port preferred to deal with North. Their first pick next year should be a good one.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Oh my!How’s Leppa looking now?
The universe would implode as they try to divide by zeroI would love to see a West Coast / Port deal happen
Would be a good watch
Yeah there was 1 winner and you’ve missed itGC and Port the winners here.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
We traded a first round pick, a second round pick and two fringe players for a dual AA player who will give us 5+ years of high quality football barring injury.They're 18 and cost us next to nothing. You're spud is 28 and you sold the farm!
Can't wait to see Macrae explain missing out on finals through his permanently puckered lips.

Missed on Perryman, to Collingwood lol, missed on Cumming, lost Houston.Why would port take Atkins contract ?
Just makes no sense at all
Give away Houston for unders
Take Luko contract on fully
And Atkins
WTF ?
Cant wait for Karen on the radio tomorrow morning
Bahahahahaha.. that is a terrible deal for port!..
Where are all the port supporters claiming Dan was a two firsts minimum type of player?..
Some where even claim two early firsts
They have made their side way worse.. and their draft hand..
Imagine they have a bad year next year and finish bottom eight..
They looked terrible in the finals without Houston.
There is always the port board.Come to read melts and salt from Port fans but got 8 pages of dick measuring from Collingwood and Carlton fans instead![]()
Yeah there was 1 winner and you’ve missed it
I would love to see a West Coast / Port deal happen
Would be a good watch
We know it's a terrible deal, d!pshit.Bahahahahaha.. that is a terrible deal for port!..
Where are all the port supporters claiming Dan was a two firsts minimum type of player?..
Some where even claim two early firsts
They have made their side way worse.. and their draft hand..
Imagine they have a bad year next year and finish bottom eight..
They looked terrible in the finals without Houston.
Yeah, ok.Nah GC got the points they need plus a player who fills a need. Port got two trade targets they identified and moved on a highly paid half back.
They still think they can get him I assume.Why are Carlton fans infiltrating the Houston thread? It’s a bit weird.
I mean, taking $2.2M salary dumps from 2 players while also giving a F1.........Houston was always around pick 10 so that deal is fair.So it's a terrible trade but he's not worth two first rounders?
Can you explain that one to me?
Either he is worth two first rounders, and we got fleeced because we didn't get 2
Or he's not worth 2 firsts and that makes the trade not bad?
I mean, taking $2.2M salary dumps from 2 players while also giving a F1.........Houston was always around pick 10 so that deal is fair.
Honestly if I were a Port supporter I’d be more angry about the Lukosious part of that deal. How GC managed to convince your FD to hand over a future first rounder for a fringe player on a million dollars a year is beyond me. If anything they should have been giving you a pick to take him because that was the worst contract in the AFL.So it's a terrible trade but he's not worth two first rounders?
Can you explain that one to me?
Either he is worth two first rounders, and we got fleeced because we didn't get 2
Or he's not worth 2 firsts and that makes the trade not bad?
He was posting about the trade wasn't he?I don't think you've understood the point i was trying to make in reply to OP
Still a red headed heart throbHow’s Leppa looking now?
He’s not worth two first rounders..So it's a terrible trade but he's not worth two first rounders?
Can you explain that one to me?
Either he is worth two first rounders, and we got fleeced because we didn't get 2
Or he's not worth 2 firsts and that makes the trade not bad?
At least we were involved in the trade and not just sookingCome to read melts and salt from Port fans but got 8 pages of dick measuring from Collingwood and Carlton fans instead![]()
He’s not worth two first rounders..
But he’s worth way more than the shite you just got for him.
Mid top 10 pick (around pick 5) if you ask me..
Pick 13.. which will drift.. and some later round speculators is just ridiculously bad.
Add in taking on two salary dumps for no return and it looks even more terrible.