If it's anything like a school, all staff would be briefed on his disability and be well aware of what his ticks look like. Based on that there would be adjustments made allowing for consideration. For example if his ticks present as a verbal exclamation with no physical component such as pointing, then any action that including pointing in the direction of an umpire while swearing would likely be considered intentional.Umps should be able to distinguish between n abusive outburst and a heat of the moment f bomb in frustration anyway imo
Let alone if it lines up so that an involuntary tic causes someone to swear at or curse at an ump. Given the tic is involuntary it would be unlucky to even be toward an ump surely?
Just manage the dissent rule correctly and logically and it’s a non issue ( I am not up to speed with Tourettes)



