GremioPower
Sack Richo/Cardone/Koch
- May 26, 2017
- 24,537
- 50,497
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Grêmio, DC United, Pistons
We could be 1 and 10 if you want to be doom and gloom
4-7 it is.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
We could be 1 and 10 if you want to be doom and gloom
Yeah it is. I'd rather be this position than false hope at 7 and 4 which we could easily be and scrape into finals win a game and then get thumped. We probably deserve to be here tbh.4-7 it is.
Yeah it is. I'd rather be this position than false hope at 7 and 4 which we could easily be and scrape into finals win a game and then get thumped. We probably deserve to be here tbh.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
In a broader sense, Port's continued success did rankle the sanfl and they were always trying ways to blunt us off-field administratively. But we always bounced back and became stronger.
Bringing this to a better thread.
This is what I was after. Thank you.
I would love to know more examples. I've read somewhere that Woodville joining the SANFL in 1964 was an attempt to harm Port's dominance. (Centrals was the other addition.) However, I have no idea whether it's true.
That's what I've always heard....... I've read somewhere that Woodville joining the SANFL in 1964 was an attempt to harm Port's dominance........ However, I have no idea whether it's true.
We could be 4-7 just as easy.

You just hate the club and want it to fail. No better than a Crom supporter!
Anyone ever notice how the people on this forum who are constantly derided as “negative” or “doomsayers” have a pretty high strike rate of being proven correct?
Bringing this to a better thread.
This is what I was after. Thank you.
I would love to know more examples. I've read somewhere that Woodville joining the SANFL in 1964 was an attempt to harm Port's dominance. (Centrals was the other addition.) However, I have no idea whether it's true.
Yeah but that's for a 13" rim**** man, 15 bucks for tires
The view on this in 1982 of Port's greatest ever administrator
The view on this in 1982 of Port's greatest ever administrator

All pre-season it had a bad feel about it with what we were losing, but the 'RCG' wearers brought me around to thinking this wouldn't be the year of our slide, but the reality of our clubs position has really come home to roost.
Anyone ever notice how the people on this forum who are constantly derided as “negative” or “doomsayers” have a pretty high strike rate of being proven correct?
I buy into the Janus theory that we are responsible for the disasters because our energy projection is so strong that we will it into existence and directly influence the players minds from our vibes.
Pfizer didn't discover what would become the little blue pill until 1989."Can those Peckers last?"
![]()
We only had him for a short while, but man... in his prime wow
Woodvile admitted when undeserving, but equally booted out,/forced to merge when I believe they were financially sound,and it was Torrens who were broke.
Incidentally I tend to think the PAFC has now morphed into West Torrens, although admittedly they wouldn't have allowed the same loser coach to be in charge for 13 years.