Shot Marnus
The interesting comparison to Cummins is Mitchell Johnson who had 313 in 73 tests vs 300 in 68.
It's definately Cummins IMO. Agree Johnson had periods of unplayable dominance but Cummins is way more consistent over the journey. It's really the mental side that separates the two. When high on confidence, Johnson was the best bowler in the world (probably a higher peak than Cummins). However, when confidence was down, he was genuinely awful.
Cummins mental side has obviously seen him lead the team out of a very tumultuous era and back to being the world's best (with a team nowhere near as strong as previous versions). Lead from the front and played a number of very important innings with the bat (Johnson could hit the ball too but didn't play near as many crucial innings).



