Its not about any club having to satisfy the other, its about getting the best deal you can under the circumstances.As you stated you dont know Nas but he seems pretty logical and I don't seeing him wanting to play for WC for multiple years. If Poet/Crows can't get a deal done with WC then PSD, WC look to be finishing bottom for at least another year(2026) then Tassie will take up that mantle.
Why is it on Saints to satisfy Port or Crows in the deal? You want a top 10 player then pay up, you guys have assets that can be off loaded to get picking between 5 and 15. It seems like Saints have to be bent over in a trade for it to be fair.
The way I see it, Port and Crows have to pony up or Nas will be the one to be hurt in the deal.
If Port only have access to two late first round picks and a player like Whitlock, then that's what it will have to be.
If he was still contracted St Kilda could then say, thanks but we will keep him.
If he has decided to leave, and Port is his option, then that's the only realistic option for you pick wise unless other clubs come in to widen the pool in a multi club deal. Now, Port have shown an ability to get involved with those, so maybe something like that can happen, but again, that's only reliant on Port using the picks and players they have the ability to move.





is the issue.