Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Guess who loses the most if we go back to the Wild West, grow a brainThis indigenous man should get 0 weeks. Other players should have gotten 0 weeks too. Draw a line in the sand now and just stop the insane bans.
That's why I asked for a specific example which has yet to be forthcoming.Every man can have their opinion but it's a long bow to draw to claim that personal insults about someone's partner are definitely better than using an expletive that has historically been a slur.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
What about if Rankine was on a bus and it was going to explode if he didn't use the f word? How many weeks?!Can someone please compile a list of all the whataboutisms from the last ten pages? Reckon there would be minimum 30 of increasing ridiculousness.
Whataboutism isn’t a word. It’s made up.Holy whataboutism batman!

Hey I'm with you. Snoop dog shouldn't be anywhere near the AFL GF.Whataboutism isn’t a word. It’s made up.
You want to look at double standards? Let’s just suspend someone for saying the F word but employ SD with the litany of felonies that have encompassed him for many a year.
You either decide you want to make a stand on all forms of antisocial behaviour and or commentary or not. You can’t pick and choose where your standards fall to look like a progressive organisation in order to tick an equality box.
Pretty poor defence from Adelaide I reckon ,to say he copped some verbal from the opposition so it’s ok to give it back and call someone a ******![]()
You do know Houston KO Rankine last year and got 5 weeks????Pretty poor defence from Adelaide I reckon ,to say he copped some verbal from the opposition so it’s ok to give it back and call someone a ******![]()
I agree, unless there's something we don't know. I'm sure it will all come out.Pretty poor defence from Adelaide I reckon ,to say he copped some verbal from the opposition so it’s ok to give it back and call someone a ******![]()
You do know Houston KO Rankine last year and got 5 weeks????
Laughably bad. The club has an ongoing track record with insensitivity and this just shows nothing has changed.Pretty poor defence from Adelaide I reckon ,to say he copped some verbal from the opposition so it’s ok to give it back and call someone a ******![]()
But what did Quaynor do?You do know Houston KO Rankine last year and got 5 weeks????
Lol mate a lyric from 25 years ago should hardly be applied to today’s standards. Things have changed significantly in the last ten years. It shows a lack of intelligence to act like this.If he's banned the Crows need to take out an injunction on the grand final to prevent documented homophobic rapper from appearing
Maybe the Collingwood player said "Houston will KO you again, pussy"????But what did Quaynor do?
Reckon the part where it says multi-faceted defence suggests it is more than just that, champIs that it? Embarrassing by the club to even submit it.
So call the Collingwood player a ****wit, not what he actually did.Maybe the Collingwood player said "Houston will KO you again pussy"????
Unpopular take perhaps (and not condoning the act), but to me, the term 'f***t" has largely lost it's meaning over the years, much like 'w****r' has. To me, both these terms are more akin to calling someone a *d**khead' these days.
Obviously no one can go inside Rankin's head, but I would not be surprised if his true intent was not a deliberate attack on homsexuals, but more a very poor choice of words in the heat of the moment.
people who keep posting this ridiculous false equivalence are beyond saving.AFL are putting snoop on a pedestal would be pretty hypocritical if they came out with a suspension here