Where do the Conservative moderates go?Moderates are leaving in droves. The hardliners will Democrats themselves.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Where do the Conservative moderates go?Moderates are leaving in droves. The hardliners will Democrats themselves.
Where do the Conservative moderates go?
The Liberal Party are all but devoid of small "l" liberals. That cohort has either got old and is slowly vanishing from the earth and the other ones who were brought up as small "lers", have migrated to the teals or to Labor.The current Liberals are an evangelical Christian party and a greater Israel is a core value of the evangelicals. Unconditional support of Israel is an unconditional requirement for the Liberal base.
I know there are some small "l" liberals somewhere - but they do not have the numbers anywhere.
Church.Where do the Conservative moderates go?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Also, the Teals will likely have zero power the next couple of elections while Labor has a huge majority so who knows. Holmes-a-Court and Cannon-Brookes likely will stop putting their own money in and donors will start to dry up. Especially when people realise all they are doing is donating money to bankroll the retirement funds of nutty 50-something women.
Not sure about that. Haines, Sharkie, Gee have a pretty solid position in traditionally LNP seats, Wilkie, Le in a traditional Labor seat. The Teals are no more “nutty” than them. Once an independent is established then it’s hard to remove them.
At least she has shown some spine...Price to leave the Libs and go independent maybe ?
Why? What mechanisms to they have to become more 'moderate'? Their members are majority nutters now, installing nutter candidates. They just purged themselves of moderates, and are seemingly convinced they were too woke last election, so why would they invite moderates back in?They are removed as soon as the money dries up and Labor / Liberals get their act together. The Liberals will be a shambles next election, but potentially are better the election after.
Why? What mechanisms to they have to become more 'moderate'? Their members are majority nutters now, installing nutter candidates. They just purged themselves of moderates, and are seemingly convinced they were too woke last election, so why would they invite moderates back in?
Do you think Gina is advising them to be more moderate?!Because its always about money, which brings power. If they end up smaller than the Nationals there wont be money.
Gina isnt going to invite them to lunches and dinners if they cant give her anything.
Do you think Gina is advising them to be more moderate?!
I dont think she cares about whether they are moderate or religious nutjobs. I think she wants more access to land and sea for mining, no fuel excise on remote vehicles, lower taxes and royalties on materials, etc.
I really dont think billionaires care about much else. They certainly pretend to care. In the US its abortion and guns. Billionaires wouldnt give a ****. They hate paying taxes and want to be richer than the other billionaires.
The photos we have seen of Gina at Trump and/or Maga events show that she does care for the extreme side of conservative politics.
I dont think you've been paying much attention then. Yes, she cares about money and power. But she's been clearley using her influence in the libs to go further right.I dont think she cares about whether they are moderate or religious nutjobs. I think she wants more access to land and sea for mining, no fuel excise on remote vehicles, lower taxes and royalties on materials, etc.
I really dont think billionaires care about much else. They certainly pretend to care. In the US its abortion and guns. Billionaires wouldnt give a ****. They hate paying taxes and want to be richer than the other billionaires.
I dont think you've been paying much attention then. Yes, she cares about money and power. But she's been clearley using her influence in the libs to go further right.
You are correct that she will dump them once it's clear they are done, but she is not a moderating force on them at all.
Parties don't act in their own interests. They act in the interests of all their various keyholders. Usually the two interests align for the reasons you mention. But sometimes, as evidenced by the liberals, those keyholder interests can drive the party into the ground.
I just don't see where any moderation can come from.
It's really poor pollingShocker of a Newspoll for the Liberals and Sussan in particular.
While Albanese has a net approval rating of -5 (so by no means is he popular), Ley's is -17, and Albanese leads as preferred Prime Minister 51-31.
The only Opposition Leader to have a worse approval rating than her this early in their tenure was Alexander Downer.
Labor leads 2PP 58-42, which is the most lopsided since the June 2013 results that saw Julia Gillard ousted.
It's really poor polling
I find is astounding they have no clear communicated policies