Curto
Team Captain
Jon Ralph has gone MAGA, just bulls*#t and get clicks!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
This is why I don't consume footy media. They do all of it intentionally to farm engagement. If you don't watch/listen to them, their shit doesn't affect you, and they'll evetually lose their job because they're not generating revenue.Just bulls*#t and get clicks!
I assumed it was about Fox showing two identical clips of players getting grazed high and Ralph says the one that was on the ball is a suspension and the one that was off the ball is a fine…This over JDG’s contact? If so it looks a straightforward one to me.
It’ll be interesting to see how they assess it. Can he get a fine? I’m not sure how that would need to spit out if it’s deemed rough conduct. I must admit I’m much more nervous than it seems most on here.I assumed it was about Fox showing two identical clips of players getting grazed high and Ralph says the one that was on the ball is a suspension and the one that was off the ball is a fine…
Fine I’ll cop through gritted teeth. Any match sanction we’ll be challenging as that’s as soft as shit if he gets citedIt’ll be interesting to see how they assess it. Can he get a fine? I’m not sure how that would need to spit out if it’s deemed rough conduct. I must admit I’m much more nervous than it seems most on here.
I agree we’d challenge any suspension and I imagine the argument would be that the contact was in the act of smothering not a bump along with the contact being low (if it needs to be medium for a suspension). Whilst not exact, it’s rare that there’s ever two exactly alike, the precedence that has me nervous is Laird’s suspension v WC. We’ll see by Friday evening I guess.Fine I’ll cop through gritted teeth. Any match sanction we’ll be challenging as that’s as soft as shit if he gets cited
It was pure controversy stoking. If hes said one is a fine and one is a suspension, he's graded them both as reportable conduct and somehow deduced that JDG's impact was higher?I assumed it was about Fox showing two identical clips of players getting grazed high and Ralph says the one that was on the ball is a suspension and the one that was off the ball is a fine…
I reckon there’s a clear argument for careless & low impactI agree we’d challenge any suspension and I imagine the argument would be that the contact was in the act of smothering not a bump along with the contact being low (if it needs to be medium for a suspension). Whilst not exact, it’s rare that there’s ever two exactly alike, the precedence that has me nervous is Laird’s suspension v WC. We’ll see by Friday evening I guess.
I don't think either was careless.I reckon there’s a clear argument for careless & low impact
Jon Ralph has gone MAGA, just bulls*#t and get clicks!
Well he shot himself in the foot tonight.
We all knew he was a sad, bitter Collingwood hater from way back.
Now everyone does.
He lost all credibility tonight, he embarrassed himself both personally and professionally.
He behaved as if he’s a pathetic individual.
On the telecast they said low impact is a fine. If I remember correctly.It’ll be interesting to see how they assess it. Can he get a fine? I’m not sure how that would need to spit out if it’s deemed rough conduct. I must admit I’m much more nervous than it seems most on here.
Loved Dunstall for this, confident enough to voice his own opinions even after the panel stated this is Ralphys so called domain.Yep
Dunstall politely schooled him
Ralph eventually shut up because he lost his colleagues