DontArgue4
17š19š20š
- May 3, 2013
- 19,533
- 62,815
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Houston Rockets, Arsenal, PhiEagles
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty AFLW Notice Img
AFLW 2025 - AFLW Trade and Draft - All the player moves
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Eagles board reckon Richmond will trade picks 2&3 for pick 1![]()
True. My apologise.
I was more referring to Maynardās aggression. Do something to Xav and heāll use his next chance to run through you or put some extra mayo on tackle. But he probably plays more like Vlas with his intercepting.
His kicking is sus though and itās a lot of short safe chips.
So youāre saying weāre getting Butters?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
When an unstoppable force (Robey) meets an immovable object (Josh "how is be top 4?" Lindsay)
NOPE!am I the only one who thinks Weet Coast would be insane if they donāt take sharp.
No. Hes the best fit for them. They've got a whole heap of versatile guys and likely add Duursma, they need that bull.am I the only one who thinks Weet Coast would be insane if they donāt take sharp.
I know he says it's a form guide but he definitely does his ratings based on who he thinks the clubs with the picks will take.
am I the only one who thinks Weet Coast would be insane if they donāt take sharp.
The beggars will take Sharp. Calculated has lost the plot.am I the only one who thinks Weet Coast would be insane if they donāt take sharp.
Dunno. Hes already said he thinks WC take the first 2 and has slid Sharp who is a clunky fit for Richmond straight past us now and boosted up 2 kids that suit us better.I seriously doubt this. Not this far out either.
Had a look at last year's form guide for September, and Twomey's top 10 was:
- Ashcroft
- Langford
- Jagga
- FOS
- Murphy Reid
- Lalor
- Smillie
- Draper
- Armstrong
- Tauru
Eagles board reckon Richmond will trade picks 2&3 for pick 1![]()
Hell noDid it hurt seeing Robey at 3 on Cals open rankings?
How ****en slow do ya want us to be?How would people feel if we drafted Sullivan Robey and Oliver Greeves?
Our midfield in a few years would be...
Smillie (196)
Robey (191)
Greeves (191)
Lalor (187)
Hotton (183)
That would be amazing given each of them can also be damaging up forward.
Yeah slower than you on the uptake that Robey is a gun is bloody slow!How ****en slow do ya want us to be?

Hell no
Blair did say we'll split.
Bombers will be desperate.
Pick 3 for 5/6 f1 & f2.
Bookmark it.
Dunno. Hes already said he thinks WC take the first 2 and has slid Sharp who is a clunky fit for Richmond straight past us now and boosted up 2 kids that suit us better.
Pretty sure when asked on our 2 picks that he thought Robey and XT were good options we would look at.
You tell him bro.Not sure Twomey saying WCE will take the two best talents in Duursma and CDT if they have picks 1 and 2 is breaking news though. The conversation around Sharp has always been about WCE's list need rather than Sharp being a better footballer.
When Sharp's traits are as obvious as they are, it's easier to find players who you predict to have higher upside, and thus rank them as better talents as Sharp. I think it's pretty much common consensus that Sharp is a player with a high floor, but low ceiling. Anyone who has a higher ceiling could very easily become rated higher than him if they prove to have a decent floor as well.
This can just as easily be Cal viewing it as "I've ranked Robey and Taylor as the next best talent, and Richmond have those picks, so I'll mention those names".
If you were to name the best 10 non-club aligned players for the draft, and rule out the taller prospects (ie. CDT, Schubert, etc...), then you can make a case that we are interested in all those left over players for one reason or another.
Just don't think it's as deep as you're making it.