- May 5, 2016
- 52,328
- 59,283
- AFL Club
- Geelong
See, this is loser talk.
If you had your way, Danger would have retired at the end of last year, Cats don't get into a Grand Final (starting $1.50 faves) courtesy of Danger's matchwinning Preliminary Final performance.
You compile your best list every year, and pit your best team on the park every week.
This. Yes every club or team in sport has to balance what is happening right now with what they want to happen in one, two, three seasons time or whatever.
To do that you have to weigh up the assets you have at your disposal. The players you think can win you a game, the players you think can play a role, the players you think can be depth if you have injuries, the ones you can do without, and also whether you can improve on those assets for less money to strengthen other areas that might cost more money.
I don’t think even as Captain Dangerfield would be on money near what he was at his peak so the question is very simple: can he play a role that makes him one of the best 22 players every week, and can he win us the odd game.
He won us about 5-6 off his own boot this year. So as poor as his GF was, for now the answer is probably yes. He plays again and it’s someone like Stanley who ISNT a certain best 22 player and doesn’t look like he will hold down a spot that goes. Jed Bews gets tapped. Mitch Duncan has already retired. Jake Kolodjashnij is borderline though we probably could have done with him. Cam Guthrie probably goes. There’s a strong chance we part ways with Tanner Bruhn pending the outcome of that mess.
So there’s possibly 6 guys who while not on superstar money would all be reasonably well paid that, if they went, would allow us to strengthen in some areas we need to while Dangerfield can, for all we really care, be a bottom 6 player if he’s occasionally doing something decent but we are a better team.



