Remove this Banner Ad

Delisted Callum Ah Chee - Joins Adelaide via the PSD

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

In the real world be are back to back premiers
Pfft… back2back is not really that impressive… 92 94… 05 06… so easy. If you really want to impress me, show me where Brisbane went back2back2back! Huh?!
Staring Episode 2 GIF by The Office
 
alright, thanks for all the lolz but I think I'm done with this thread...looking forward to the PSD drama

see you all then :cool:
 
I did mention my memory was hazy - I'm not really that invested tbh

Certainly there was discussion around it

Clubs and the AFL get salty when other clubs appear to gain an advantage, by trying something new but within the rules.

Especially the Vic clubs, because they’re so used to doing things the old ways and paying brown paper bags under the table.
 
That’s not the point and moving the goal posts. We played by the rules of the day, we all won.
What moving the goal post? The discussion was around a poster comparing how Daniher and Ah Chee structured their contract and how they are similarly "manipulated". Daniher structure it which allow Essendon to receive a Band 1 compensation which affected the picks of other clubs 1st rounder whereas Ah Chee is doing the same but doesn't affect the club's PSD pick. One was manipulated as part of FA and the other isn't as part of PSD. Why do you think clubs need to sign FA players to 4-5 years after that "blunder" by the AFL.
 
Clubs and the AFL get salty when other clubs appear to gain an advantage, by trying something new but within the rules.

Especially the Vic clubs, because they’re so used to doing things the old ways and paying brown paper bags under the table.

Yep.

The AFL makes it’s rules and changes them on the fly.

It’s the same as with the Sydney COLA stuff. Swans didn’t break any rules, they just used it in a way that the AFL didn’t like or anticipate, so they were punished.

My theory with the PSD, is that the unwritten rule is clubs are only allowed to use it if they offer a fair trade and it’s rejected. I think if a club tried to lowball another club and then selected a player through the PSD, there’d be some repercussions from the AFL.
 
See Bird Box GIF


I can’t believe I listened to SENSA slop. I like the part where he said with a straight face that historically the future second was more than enough for Cal, while players like Ainsworth, Tylar Young (who?) and Buderick were traded for much better picks.
Historical anything is basically irrelevant for this offseason. Playing under different rules now
 
What moving the goal post? The discussion was around a poster comparing how Daniher and Ah Chee structured their contract and how they are similarly "manipulated". Daniher structure it which allow Essendon to receive a Band 1 compensation which affected the picks of other clubs 1st rounder whereas Ah Chee is doing the same but doesn't affect the club's PSD pick. One was manipulated as part of FA and the other isn't as part of PSD. Why do you think clubs need to sign FA players to 4-5 years after that "blunder" by the AFL.
I haven’t read that conversation. I couldn’t be arsed reading all 8 pages since I was last on.

90% of posters here know very few of the AFL’s actual rules. And with the AFL changing them all the time, it’s hard to keep up.

Like I’m pretty sure the AFL didn’t change any of the free agency compensation rules after Daniher’s extended.

Any changes, such aa band 1 needing to be 5 a year contract, only came in last year or this year. Even so, it’s explicitly not mentioned, as the AFL would need to divulge all the secret herbs and spices.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Yep.

The AFL makes it’s rules and changes them on the fly.

It’s the same as with the Sydney COLA stuff. Swans didn’t break any rules, they just used it in a way that the AFL didn’t like or anticipate, so they were punished.

My theory with the PSD, is that the unwritten rule is clubs are only allowed to use it if they offer a fair trade and it’s rejected. I think if a club tried to lowball another club and then selected a player through the PSD, there’d be some repercussions from the AFL.
I doubt that. More likely the afl would quietly tell the clubs to get sh!t done, then look after the “aggrieved” club through fixturing, etc.

If the AFL didn’t crack it at Carlton, re screwing GC about with Jack Martin, the AFL isn’t interfering with the PSD.
 
Alright I’m out.

Adelaide is not a serious club, I wish Karma to bite them again, similar to 2017.
I'm hearing the Brisbane players aren't too impressed with Dom "the prick" treatment of Ah Chee who has been transparent and upfront with Brisbane very early about his wish to leave the club and come to a club he supported growing up who will paid what he is worth, I guess the players know how Brisbane has underpaid him for years and short changed him. I wish Karma to effect them next year and will be the start of a playing group fall out with management, similar to Melbourne and then for Tasmania to raid your players. Forget offering Daicos $3M, offer Will Ashcroft $3.5M.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I'm hearing the Brisbane players aren't too impressed with Dom "the prick" treatment of Ah Chee who has been transparent and upfront with Brisbane very early about his wish to leave the club and come to a club he supported growing up who will paid what he is worth, I guess the players know how Brisbane has underpaid him for years and short changed him. I wish Karma to effect them next year and will be the start of a playing group fall out with management, similar to Melbourne and then for Tasmania to raid your players. Forget offering Daicos $3M, offer Will Ashcroft $3.5M.
You might’ve missed Will Ashcroft already resigning, clearly didn’t affect his decision all that much
 

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top