I agree. If a player has signed a 5 year deal for $5 mil and the parties agree to front end load it so player gets $1.3m for first 3 years and then be due just 550,000 for final 2 years; if player decides to leave after 3 years they should have to repay the $900,000 that they have received as front loaded payment.
If this was written into all front loaded contracts it would be a strong incentive for players to honour the original long term contract.
Clubs front and back end payments for their benefit, not the players - it helps them move money around to juggle the salary cap. The actual amount of money paid isn’t going to bankrupt the club - clubs would be able to pay more to fit in more stars if the cap allowed it. Even if the club got the money back, they can’t really spend it due to the cap.
You could give them cap space back, but then do you take space from the club trading them in? If you don’t balance it then you’re increasing the overall salary, and you can’t make it retrospective as it would put clubs in breach. FWIW, I’d love to see cap space as an actual tradable asset - ie: a club trades away a high draft pick for the ability to spend an extra million bucks for one superstar…
I feel that front ended deals already impact trades enough anyway. No doubt we took the money we’d paid Charlie into account when setting our trade price. It made it harder to get the deal. If Charlie’s deal was only about money, then the club would have re-negotiated his contract, just like saints did with Wilkie or Essendon with Merrett last year.



