Current WAR CRIMES Israel Hamas Conflict Pt 2 - ICC issues warrants for Israel's Benjamin Netanyahu & Yoav Gallant * Warrant for Deif is cancelled

[Kurve]

Here is PART 1

The ICC has also issued warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant. The warrant for Deif was cancelled on confirmation of his death.

For Netanyahu and Gallant, who was replaced as defence minister earlier this month, the chamber “found reasonable grounds to believe” that they “each bear criminal responsibility for the following crimes as co-perpetrators for committing the acts jointly with others: the war crime of starvation as a method of warfare; and the crimes against humanity of murder, persecution, and other inhumane acts”.

It also found reasonable grounds to believe that “each bear criminal responsibility as civilian superiors for the war crime of intentionally directing an attack against the civilian population”.

According to the ICC, the chamber “found reasonable grounds to believe” that Deif was “responsible for the crimes against humanity of murder; extermination; torture; and rape and other form of sexual violence; as well as the war crimes of murder, cruel treatment, torture; taking hostages; outrages upon personal dignity; and rape and other form of sexual violence”.

It also said there were reasonable grounds to believe the crimes against humanity were “part of a widespread and systematic attack directed by Hamas and other armed groups against the civilian population of Israel”. CANCELLED POST-DEATH.

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT - Elements of Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes

Rules - Updated Crime Board Rules - READ BEFORE POSTING​

General Information The BigFooty Crime board is a community that fosters discussion on current and past crimes, some which have social and media notoriety, that attracts the attention of public opinion and discussion on such matters. Please read these rules very carefully, both the Big Footy...
www.bigfooty.com

NO GORE OR CORPSE IMAGERY, THANKS

 

[CM86]

Such a brave stance against someone advocating for war crimes. You must really hate war crimes to come out that strongly.

Considering you claim that you're not defending settlers in the West Bank.
Who are you saying is advocating for war crimes, and what did they say that advocates for war crimes?
Please quote the post, so we can all condemn anyone advocating for war crimes.

 

[faible]

 

[Zidane98]

The Amnesty International Oct 7 report has been released

https://www.amnesty.org/en/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/MDE1502822025ENGLISH.pdf

It's not for the faint hearted.

For any chance of peace for civilians in Palestine & Israel Hamas must hand over Gaza to PA per ceasefire agreement.

Hamas exist simply to annihilate Jews and / or profit off the people of Gaza sponsored by Iran.

 

[Deliverance]

Don't all journalists benefit when reporting, writing or discussing their main field?

The Israel lobby certainly know this.

 

[Jazny]

Considering you claim that you're not defending settlers in the West Bank.
Who are you saying is advocating for war crimes, and what did they say that advocates for war crimes?
Please quote the post, so we can all condemn anyone advocating for war crimes.

You:

And there is no such thing as a civilian settler in the West Bank.

Israelis are civilians, and violence towards them isn't justified.
West Bank settlers aren't civilians.

West bank settlers are civilians and violence towards them isn't justified. If the violence is part of an armed conflict, it's a war crime... with the only exception being if they are DIRECTLY participating in hostilities.

 

[CM86]

You:


West bank settlers are civilians and violence towards them isn't justified. If the violence is part of an armed conflict, it's a war crime... with the only exception being if they are DIRECTLY participating in hostilities.

1.What war crime am I advocating for?

2.Why are you defending West Bank settlers, who are literally enforcing violence and death on civilians?

3.Who are West Bank settlers harming, if it isn't civilians?

 

[Jazny]

1.What war crime am I advocating for?

Attacking civilians.

2.Why are you defending West Bank settlers, who are literally enforcing violence and death on civilians?

That's like claiming all Gazans are terrorists. Is all you know about settlers in the West Bank the extremists you see in the news?

3.Who are West Bank settlers harming, if it isn't civilians?

The extremists are harming civilians.

 

[Jameggins]

Every single settler is a criminal as the settlements are a violation of the Geneva Convention.

The same can't be said for every Gazan.

 

[Zidane98]

It's surprising with all this talk of apartheid that there is basically zero mention of the fact that Jews cannot purchase property in Palestine and that selling a property to a Jew in Palestine is punishable with death. There is no more extreme form of apartheid anywhere.

Whatever 2 state solution is eventually agreed it must allow for Jewish residents of Palestine as per the original UN partition.

 

[Chief]

Jews cannot purchase property in Palestine and that selling a property to a Jew in Palestine is punishable with death.

Never heard that. Maybe if Israel stopped bombing children and stealing land, the healing might begin.

 

[CM86]

Attacking civilians.

That's like claiming all Gazans are terrorists. Is all you know about settlers in the West Bank the extremists you see in the news?

The extremists are harming civilians.

For clarity, you're defending West Bank Settlers?

But you're not defending the specific actions of enforcement that are required to defend and support West Bank Settlers?

https://www.hrw.org/news/2025/11/20/west-bank-israel-emptying-refugee-camps-a-crime-against-humanity



Do you even understand why we call them 'settlers'? If so, can you explain it? And then also explain why you're defending it?

 

[Jazny]

Every single settler is a criminal

lol no that's not how that works.

 

[Chief]

If someone moves into your house and excludes you under threat of violence, yeah you have a right to use force to remove them.

That's pretty standard.

 

[Zidane98]

Never heard that. Maybe if Israel stopped bombing children and stealing land, the healing might begin.

Its been that way since partition - when the Arab league chose annihilation of Israel over peace.

But let's not let facts get in the way of your story.

 

[Chief]

Its been that way since partition - when the Arab league chose annihilation of Israel over peace.

The way I've read it, Israel attacked first.

I didn't think that was too controversial.

But let's not let facts get in the way of your story.

See above.

Also: Israelis don't have to buy land in Palestine. They just take it.

 

[Jameggins]

lol no that's not how that works.

All the settlements are criminal. All settlers are taking part in the crime. Therefore all settlers are criminal. Pretty simple stuff even for someone like you.

 

[Deliverance]

It's surprising with all this talk of apartheid that there is basically zero mention of the fact that Jews cannot purchase property in Palestine and that selling a property to a Jew in Palestine is punishable with death. There is no more extreme form of apartheid anywhere.

Whatever 2 state solution is eventually agreed it must allow for Jewish residents of Palestine as per the original UN partition.

I thought they owned land in Gaza until the Israeli government forcibly removed them?
No need to buy land in the West Bank anyway, they just annex it.

 

[Jazny]

All the settlements are criminal. All settlers are taking part in the crime. Therefore all settlers are criminal. Pretty simple stuff even for someone like you.

What's the crime they are committing? The elements of the crime of transferring their own population into a territory they occupy relate to decision makers at the state level, not the individuals being transfered.

Imagine if for whatever reason an international court decides that Australia didn't have jus ad bellum for joining the Iraq war, so Australia's participation was a crime of aggression. That wouldn't make all Australian Iraq war veterans criminals because they participated in a crime.

But your logic: The Australian invasion of Iraq was criminal. All Australian soldiers were taking part in the crime. Therefore all soldiers are criminal. Customary international law doesn't follow your logic on this. These are both crimes at the leadership level, not crimes civilians and soldiers are responsible for.

 

[Chief]

Jazny are you saying the Israeli occupiers of Palestinian land are taking part in a war against their own will? They're being forcibly relocated?

 

[Jazny]

Jazny are you saying the Israeli occupiers of Palestinian land are taking part in a war against their own will? They're being forcibly relocated?

No? What?

 

[Chief]

What's the crime they are committing? The elements of the crime of transferring their own population into a territory they occupy relate to decision makers at the state level, not the individuals being transfered.

/\ That.

 

[Jazny]

/\ That.

The ICJ in an advisory opinion determined that Israeli settlements breach article 49 of the fourth Geneva convention that prohibits the transfer of an occupier's civilians into a area it occupies (not necessarily by force, see the Wall advisory opinion).

Notice it's civilian population? If they moved non-civilians in, like some people suggest all settlers in the West Bank are, then it wouldn't actually be a war crime. Israel could station 700,000 combatants in barracks in areas they occupy if they wanted to. There is no legal argument at all anyone can possibly make that the settlers are not civilians. This is established law.

Okay, so what crime are the actual civilians breaching? None. The crime of transfer is on decision makes at a state level. So the only people that can be punished would be people who meet the elements of the crime, not the civilians. Also, how weird would it be to argue baby settlers are committing crimes? A lot of them are even born in Area C, lived there all their lives, maybe even 3rd or 4th generation. Imagine thinking that the law would say they are criminals at birth, or magically become criminals when they turn 18. It's total nonsense.

I don't like how you said "Israeli occupiers of Palestinian land are taking part in a war". They aren't participating in a war, unless they are active in the IDF. Stop using language that tries to justify violence against civilians. I don't know if you are consciously doing this, but you need to stop.

Can Palestinians defend themselves against violent settler terrorists? Yes of course. But they can't just start targeting random Israelis living in the West Bank because they are combatants and criminals. Absurd.

 

[Ghost Patrol]

The ICJ in an advisory opinion determined that Israeli settlements breach article 49 of the fourth Geneva convention that prohibits the transfer of an occupier's civilians into a area it occupies (not necessarily by force, see the Wall advisory opinion).

Notice it's civilian population? If they moved non-civilians in, like some people suggest all settlers in the West Bank are, then it wouldn't actually be a war crime. Israel could station 700,000 combatants in barracks in areas they occupy if they wanted to. There is no legal argument at all anyone can possibly make that the settlers are not civilians. This is established law.

Okay, so what crime are the actual civilians breaching? None. The crime of transfer is on decision makes at a state level. So the only people that can be punished would be people who meet the elements of the crime, not the civilians. Also, how weird would it be to argue baby settlers are committing crimes? A lot of them are even born in Area C, lived there all their lives, maybe even 3rd or 4th generation. Imagine thinking that the law would say they are criminals at birth, or magically become criminals when they turn 18. It's total nonsense.

I don't like how you said "Israeli occupiers of Palestinian land are taking part in a war". They aren't participating in a war, unless they are active in the IDF. Stop using language that tries to justify violence against civilians. I don't know if you are consciously doing this, but you need to stop.

Can Palestinians defend themselves against violent settler terrorists? Yes of course. But they can't just start targeting random Israelis living in the West Bank because they are combatants and criminals. Absurd.

Are these illegal settlements a formation of human shields?

 

[Chief]

the transfer of an occupier's civilians into a area it occupies (not necessarily by force, see the Wall advisory opinion).

Notice it's civilian population? If they moved non-civilians in

So the state is transferring Israelis in against their will? Or are these people moving in of their own accord?

What about the people who attack Palestinians and move into their farms and houses, backed up by Israeli state force - the IDF etc?

 

[Chief]

I don't like how you said "Israeli occupiers of Palestinian land are taking part in a war". They aren't participating in a war, unless they are active in the IDF. Stop using language that tries to justify violence against civilians. I don't know if you are consciously doing this, but you need to stop.

I think that a Palestinian government should be able to remove the land thieves by force.

They should have, say, their own ICE-equivalent that can arrest people and ship them off to, I dunno, Poland or Germany or Russia, or even Israel, depending where they originally came from.

They are actual illegal immigrants - they're not seeking asylum as refugees. They are illegally in Palestine, occupying land by force.