Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What's pressure got to do with the rule?Maybe. The rule is supposed to be applied to rushed behinds under no pressure. That was clearly under pressure.
Herp a derp. Learn the rules.Shouldnt of. Direct pressure was there. Razor is just a flog.
How do you get it?
What should Gibson have done?
The question is what could Gibson do? Not much. Do we want players falling over trying for a free in that situation?Any rushed behind from beyond the distance of the square is a free, regardless of pressure.
We get it because we know the rules. Like it or hate it the ump paid the correct by the law call
Supporters even harder.Geelong harder.
Commentators saying what was Gibson supposed to do? How about pick up the football? It's not complicated.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Commentators still haven't mentioned that Dangerfield is obviously playing hurt. If it was a Hawk we'd be hearing endlessly about how brave he is.
Dunno. What was Mills supposed to do 3 metres out? Its a s**t rule, but applied correctly in Gibson's case.The question is what could Gibson do? Not much. Do we want players falling over trying for a free in that situation?
50pts up and still unhappy...You're complaining that the commentators arent talking about Dangerfield enough?
Shouldnt of. Direct pressure was there. Razor is just a flog.
On public boards you are going to get opinions that differ from your own and go against a team allegiance.
Maybe the Hawks board is where you should stay if you do not want negativity and truth directed towards your own team from neutrals that seems to be hitting raw nerves.
How do you get it?
What should Gibson have done?
Leigh Matthews has no idea; Motlop regularly racks up 20+ - he's not Cyril