- Joined
- Sep 11, 2018
- Posts
- 45,606
- Reaction score
- 46,804
- Location
- Victoria
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Storm|V/OzCricket|NBA-P|NHL-P|V8|F1
- Staff
- #351
It's essentially the gambler's fallacy scientifically proven haha it uses statistical data from past similar events, positions, situations etc and spits out it's numbers... trying to predict the future is a hard enough task when you're an expert in the field, let alone relying on past performances specifically calculated...Anyone see the point in 'WINVIZ' when the whole point of it is to predict the result yet it keeps changing? It's more of a an ObservationVIZ






