Remove this Banner Ad

Mandatory detention of refugees (Stop the boats. 5k a head. Part 2)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Maggie5
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

It’s great for our country to have a prime minister suggest medical evacuations from offshore detention centres are a grave threat to us

Let's wait and see what happens when Labor wins and we tie it in with this.

If stuff all happens then you can crow about it.

We are a country of softcocks led by softcocks and soon to be led by another bunch of softcocks with a leader that people like even less than ScoMo.
 
they've been there for 7+ years or so and it's costing the taxpayer something in the order of $1bn a year to keep these facilities open, just for political victories, so, wtf should we do with these people?

How much would it have cost us if they kept pouring in, in the numbers they were? Money well spent in my opinion, however it will basically have been pissed up against the wall if Labor open the floodgates again when they win
 
Labor being "weak on borders" is electoral poison and they have just sided with the Greens to do just that. Could be another Tampa moment.

I agree but it won't be enough.

If they **** it up and they flood in again, I will never, ever vote Labor again as long as I live.
 

Yes, I’ve seen that before.

Semantically true, but as the article concludes, they’ve broken no Australian or International law.

That is the case even though these people have not committed any crime, nor broken any Australian or international law.

It’s a term used to demonise a group of people.

Professor Schloenhardt told ABC Fact Check that it is acceptable to refer to people coming to Australia without visas (including those who are not asylum seekers) as "illegal immigrants".
However, on a practical level, he says that "illegal implies that a criminal offence has been committed, which asylum seekers have not, and for that reason it is preferable to use different vocabulary".
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

How much would it have cost us if they kept pouring in, in the numbers they were? Money well spent in my opinion, however it will basically have been pissed up against the wall if Labor open the floodgates again when they win

are you suggesting they'll be arriving by boat in the near future because of this amended legislation?

the legislation relates only to those currently in detention and nobody else, the question again remains, what do we do with them?

today, and yesterday, and the day before, we allowed ex amount in and they will do precisely what those by boat are attempting to do, only difference is that they arrive by plane and then vanish into the population.
 
today, and yesterday, and the day before, we allowed ex amount in and they will do precisely what those by boat are attempting to do, only difference is that they arrive by plane and then vanish into the population.

This argument is constantly ignored in threads like this.
 
Their options are as followed:
- Stay in PNG/Nauru
- Return to their home country
- Apply for a visa to America
- Apply for a visa to another country that isn’t Australia/NZ (there have been several that have been successful gaining a visa to Canada)

Most of those who have stayed are only doing so in hope of a change of government and change of policy that’ll allow them to come to Australia.

suggest you get your facts right.

the people on those islands are still waiting to have their refugee status determined, you can't just apply for a visa, wtf planet are you living on?

The US is particularly slow in progressing the matter and some won't go there due to safety concerns in the US.

Cambodia deal has lapsed.

NZ is not an option.
 
With real wages on the decline, cost of living rising, the country in the grip of environmental disasters and banks on the nose if this government want to fight the election on border security, let them I say.
 
You can’t demand your money back if you don’t pay any income taxes in the first place.
Tim Wilson doesn't agree with you!
 

Remove this Banner Ad

With real wages on the decline, cost of living rising, the country in the grip of environmental disasters and banks on the nose if this government want to fight the election on border security, let them I say.

It's the only winner they have and it won't be anywhere near enough.
 
Something is not adding up here.
Old mate from Manus Island here claims a military background which he had...
I enjoyed the military however had achieved everything I wanted to by the time I left.

Yet he was on Manus at the age of 22.
The minimum age to join the ADF is 17.
The general, minimal term of service is 6 years.
So, he was either the greatest junior soldier the world has ever seen or he copped a dishonourable discharge before his time was up. Which I doubt would look good on a resume for this 'great job' on Manus.
In another thread he also claims active service in Afghanistan which, of course, was extremely convenient at the time, for the context of the thread.

So much bullshit.
 
Something is not adding up here.
Old mate from Manus Island here claims a military background which he had...


Yet he was on Manus at the age of 22.
The minimum age to join the ADF is 17.
The general, minimal term of service is 6 years.
So, he was either the greatest junior soldier the world has ever seen or he copped a dishonourable discharge before his time was up. Which I doubt would look good on a resume for this 'great job' on Manus.
In another thread he also claims active service in Afghanistan which, of course, was extremely convenient at the time, for the context of the thread.

So much bullshit.
3 years not 6
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Then if he accepted a ROSO of 3 years, he is very easily satisfied in having achieved everything he wanted.
I still smell bullshit.
Not questioning your opinion, just correcting the term of service minimum (which for some post graduates can even be as little as 12 months service now but unlikely for most general service enlistments)
 
This argument is constantly ignored in threads like this.
No it's not it's just lefty fantasy .

The vast amount of over stays coming by plane are young working holiday visa types the vast majority go home with there own money.

The vast majority who come here by boat would never get a visa for a plane anyway, and are economic refugees.
 
Ever heard of investigate journalism? They'd do a piece if it was true. Instead you and your colleagues just brood in silence while calling everyone who disagrees a radical leftist
Investigative journalism is dead, you get nothing but ideological crap that they try to bend the facts to fit. Left out out of the ABC and Fairfax or right out of news.
 
Not questioning your opinion, just correcting the term of service minimum (which for some post graduates can even be as little as 12 months service now but unlikely for most general service enlistments)

The story so far...
He claims of rampaging Sudanese gangs in Brisbane, despite being categorically, and correctly, refuted by the Police Commissioner and Premier. He lives in Brisbane and he knows better.
Claims that Fraser Anning lived just up the road from him. Despite Gladstone being ~500km from the Brisbane CBD.
Suddenly claims in another thread that he saw active service in Afghanistan which gave him authority to, yet again, castigate brown people.
He is suddenly one of the very few people to have 'served' on Manus Island and claims the Qld Coroner is either a liar, a left wing refugee sympathist or basically corrupt.
There is a pattern forming here and this is either one of the worlds greatest coincidences, or he's a pathological liar.
 
Last edited:

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom