List Mgmt. 2024 Trade & List Management Thread - Part 3

[giantroo]

Spoiler: 2024 Draft Picks

 

[Makeshift Park]

And CCJ.
With a future second coming back

They're basically three first rounders. Take it or leave it I say.

 

[Marstermind]

Lol

There is so much conflicting, unsourced bullshit going on that for my own sanity I'm refusing to believe anything I hear or read unless I've heard it straight from the player. And even then I'd be dubious. This whole trade period is pathetic.

 

[Disco Dew]

You don’t need ****ing 2 weeks for trade period as nothing happens until the last few days . Ridiculous!

You’re not gonna like this but I’ve heard from a few sauces that it’s being extended to three weeks next year

 

[The Filth Wizard]

Thoughts and prayers with [PLAYERCARD]Rory Atkins[/PLAYERCARD] tonight.

 

[TurnoverMerchant]

Here's my conspiracy theory: the Houston trade is the hottest topic this trade period and so the AFL could not afford to let this deal go through first thing tomorrow. They told all three clubs involved to make a scene (Port pulling out of the deal) so it can be dragged on until the deadline.

It all makes too much sense. Where would the content be otherwise?

 

[Kangaroos4eva]

Wtf is actually happening, lol.

 

[krakouers]

Wtf is actually happening, lol.

Fireman Kane saved the day?

 

[Disco Dew]

Wtf is actually happening, lol.

 

[roos_fanatic08]

Side note to distract me from Houston/Parker/Daniel.

I feel like we are one of the few clubs that hasn't recently voluntarily traded out an okay player for better capital. When was the last time we did that? Schwass?

I know we need to keep all the good players we can get but I'm surprised we haven't seen some of the bottom half of our best 22 floated to sweeten deals. Or even better players in a position of surplus to fill a need.

Who would want any of our bottom 10-15 players.

Even when we had some players of half decent value (Tarrant & Brown) we managed to **** it up and get bugger all for them.

 

[Makeshift Park]

Here's my conspiracy theory: the Houston trade is the hottest topic this trade period and so the AFL could not afford to let this deal go through first thing tomorrow. They told all three clubs involved to make a scene (Port pulling out of the deal) so it can be dragged on until the deadline.

It all makes too much sense. Where would the content be otherwise?

Maybe. Or maybe some brainiac at Port has only just realised the Atkins deal was the fourth or fifth best option already available to them.

 

[roos_fanatic08]

Here's my conspiracy theory: the Houston trade is the hottest topic this trade period and so the AFL could not afford to let this deal go through first thing tomorrow. They told all three clubs involved to make a scene (Port pulling out of the deal) so it can be dragged on until the deadline.

It all makes too much sense. Where would the content be otherwise?

This wouldn’t surprise me at all.

 

[nelroo]

You’re not gonna like this but I’ve heard from a few sauces that it’s being extended to three weeks next year

Oh FMD

 

[shinboner magic]

port fans Must of burnt a few houses down to stop this

 

[GS WARRIORS]

You’re not gonna like this but I’ve heard from a few sauces that it’s being extended to three weeks next year

Wasn't it 2 and a half weeks at some stage?

 

[Friday Night Lights]

 

[shinboner magic]

Here's my conspiracy theory: the Houston trade is the hottest topic this trade period and so the AFL could not afford to let this deal go through first thing tomorrow. They told all three clubs involved to make a scene (Port pulling out of the deal) so it can be dragged on until the deadline.

It all makes too much sense. Where would the content be otherwise?

That’d be like having 2 Xmas’s

 

[perplexed]

Does this mean our 'F1 + more' offer for pick 13 is back on the table?

 

[giantroo]

 

[Makeshift Park]

Does this mean our 'F1 + more' offer for pick 13 is back on the table?

Yes but the "more" is Sleevo and CCJ.

 

[Kangaroos4eva]

Does this mean our 'F1 + more' offer for pick 13 is back on the table?

Maybe, but probably reworking that original pies/gc/port deal to favour port more.

 

[archereleven]

The opposition to giving up 44 for Parker is a little weird imo. The hits on this are heavily outweighed by the busts.

Historical Results for AFL Draft Picks 4, 21, 44 and 62 - Draftguru

www.draftguru.com.au

Out of that list since 2013, only McCreery and Aliir are worthy of any teeth gnashing.

It's pretty much been the ballpark since we knew he wanted in imo.

On SM-G991B using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[HELLSBELLS]

It’s pretty clear now that Port want to deal with us and want Dan with us too.

 

[north_lad]

Who would want any of our bottom 10-15 players.

Even when we had some players of half decent value (Tarrant & Brown) we managed to **** it up and get bugger all for them.

 

[archereleven]

Wtf is actually happening, lol.

Absolutely nothing.

As usual.

On SM-G991B using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[jay317]

The Bradbury is still alive