Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Nailed itduckett is allergic to the 40's.
will get out soon.
trust me fellas
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
moment of utter madness! He'll be relieved to see the back of DuckettHow did he drop that.
Damien Fleming rates his taste in music, no idea if it's decent or not but he knows more about music than most cricketers do.
Nailed it
duckett is allergic to the 40's.
will get out soon.
trust me fellas
Their batting and bowling averages in test cricket are almost identical.Stokes built his entire reputation off two innings. One in the chase at Headingley and the other in the World Cup final
Take that away and he is really just England’s equivalent of Shane Watson.
.Now go back home to England you t20 hack.

Yeah it's pretty bizarre commentary. I don't think there's much logic behind it other than cannonizing aggressive decision making "He saw it and went for it, well done, better to attack then drop then to let it go to the right fielder and be unsure".Commentators on 7 are unanimous - it was Steve Smith’s fault that Cam Green dropped Ben Duckett. How was Green to know that Smith was capable of taking a single step to his left and get into position to hold a regulation catch? Group-think glazing.
Neser and Bolden bowling well.
Commentators on 7 are unanimous - it was Steve Smith’s fault that Cam Green dropped Ben Duckett. How was Green to know that Smith was capable of taking a single step to his left and get into position to hold a regulation catch? Group-think glazing.
Neser and Bolden bowling well.
49 is acceptable in the context that England average about 450 runs at home yeah.So now 49 is ‘acceptable’ and having a better average than Head away, without having relied on a neutral century to boost it, makes him horrid. This is a perplexing and ever evolving rationale.
Head plays with blokes who would have never sniffed the English one either. He’s opening with one at the moment.
Well no, he’s not better than Duckett away, he scores a higher percentage of his team’s runs which you’ve arbitrarily decided makes him better. That’s a totally different data analysis. Head has barely gotten the ball off the square in NZ, SL and Pakistan, was fairly ordinary in the UAE and even his mediocre form in the West Indies owed a lot to a number of dropped catches from our abysmal fielders.
Using your metric, I can claim that George Headley is a better batsman than anyone in history bar Bradman because he scored a greater percentage of his team’s runs then anyone else and his percentage is remarkably close to Bradman (there’s only a few percentage points in it). In fact, I will.