Remove this Banner Ad

Opinion INTERNATIONAL Politics: Adelaide Board Discussion Part 6

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chief
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Surely you understand that Biden was unable to release files due to an active court case? None the less, both sides have been dragging the chain here for obvious reasons. Anyone involved, no matter the party, should be sent to jail. No ifs, or buts.

He could’ve released them any time he wanted.

Your account has been active 20 years.

Your first mention of Epstein — September 2025.

All of you are full of shit.
 
Surely you understand that Biden was unable to release files due to an active court case? None the less, both sides have been dragging the chain here for obvious reasons. Anyone involved, no matter the party, should be sent to jail. No ifs, or buts.
No, not at all. Define "involved". I would just say anyone guilty of anything illegal at the time should be convicted, but it will be difficult to get incontrovertible evidence.
 
So nothing like “Look, I don’t agree with the Trump Administration’s policies, but you shouldn’t respond to it by rioting, burning stuff down attacking law enforcement and putting people in danger”

No, you’ve chosen to go with “Donald Trump made them mad, and now they can’t control themselves from burning shit down, it’s all his fault!”

You guys are hilarious. The gift that keeps on giving.
If law enforcement executed innocent people in cold blood in Adelaide, there would be protests here too.

What do you think is happening in Iran?

It's bizarre & sad you are still attempting to justify this... which is really showing your lack of humanity.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Jeezus, pot meet kettle.
Cookers don't even realise they are completely cooked & have lost a grasp on reality & the important issues.
 
He could’ve released them any time he wanted.

Your account has been active 20 years.

Your first mention of Epstein — September 2025.

All of you are full of shit.
No.. Biden couldn't release the files.. the files were sealed due to Ghislane Maxwell's trial. Could he have ordered them unsealed anyway? Maybe, but unlike your corrupt POTUS hero, Biden followed the rule of law and never turned the DOJ into his own political plaything to use to try and target anyone that disagrees with him or his political opponents..
Biden, like every other POTUS except Trump, allowed the DOJ to continue to operate independently of the government and Whitehouse.

Biden had morals and standards and respected the traditions of holding such a high office.. unlike your hero.
 
Just checking whether any of the Trump fan bois on here have shelled out $$$ to go and see “Melanie”?
They probably had a group catch up opening night, sharing in fist pumps...
 
No, not at all. Define "involved". I would just say anyone guilty of anything illegal at the time should be convicted, but it will be difficult to get incontrovertible evidence.
There is plenty of evidence against a few closely associated with Epstein, but for some reason they have been protected & some not even named... unlike some victims who have been named.

Tells you everything you need to know about their Department of "Justice".


 
No.. Biden couldn't release the files.. the files were sealed due to Ghislane Maxwell's trial. Could he have ordered them unsealed anyway? Maybe, but unlike your corrupt POTUS hero, Biden followed the rule of law and never turned the DOJ into his own political plaything to use to try and target anyone that disagrees with him or his political opponents..
Biden, like every other POTUS except Trump, allowed the DOJ to continue to operate independently of the government and Whitehouse.

Biden had morals and standards and respected the traditions of holding such a high office.. unlike your hero.

Wasn't Maxwell found guilty in 2021 and then sentenced in 2022?

Why couldn't Biden (or whoever was telling him where to stand) release the files in 2023 or 2024?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Wasn't Maxwell found guilty in 2021 and then sentenced in 2022?

Why couldn't Biden (or whoever was telling him where to stand) release the files in 2023 or 2024?
That's a good question!

So they need to allow time for an appeal?

This all should have been properly released ASAP... years ago. Clearly been plenty of people working behind the scenes to delay.
 
He could’ve released them any time he wanted.

Your account has been active 20 years.

Your first mention of Epstein — September 2025.

All of you are full of shit.

I can’t speak for everyone, but I was of the camp that the Epstein files should not be released. I think anyone who has potentially committed crimes and have the book thrown at them, however, I don’t think releasing the full extent of the files to the public was and is appropriate.

I can only imagine how traumatic having this played out in public for the victims. There’s also the side effect of people who’s names got mentioned without really being involved, and now they have to deal with that.

And all of that has amounted to what? I we really any closer to seeing justice?

The reason why it gets brought up with Trump is because he himself said he would release them prior to the election.

Btw, does it really matter how we got here? We all know now that the president of the United States is likely a child sex offender, and we’re all just going to let that slide because everyone is so tied to their own ideology.
 
I could be mistaken, but I thought I read that the Jeffery Epstein files were very similar to the John F Kennedy files and the FBI locked them for 99 years. Locking them for that length of time allowed the victims to live their life without the worry of giving impact statements and becoming a witness in a court case.
 
I can’t speak for everyone, but I was of the camp that the Epstein files should not be released. I think anyone who has potentially committed crimes and have the book thrown at them, however, I don’t think releasing the full extent of the files to the public was and is appropriate.

I can only imagine how traumatic having this played out in public for the victims. There’s also the side effect of people who’s names got mentioned without really being involved, and now they have to deal with that.

And all of that has amounted to what? I we really any closer to seeing justice?

The reason why it gets brought up with Trump is because he himself said he would release them prior to the election.

Btw, does it really matter how we got here? We all know now that the president of the United States is likely a child sex offender, and we’re all just going to let that slide because everyone is so tied to their own ideology.

Well Trump spent of all 2024 going on about releasing the Epstein files to placate his MAGA base because they thought it would implicate the Democrats and no-one else.
 
Well Trump spent of all 2024 going on about releasing the Epstein files to placate his MAGA base because they thought it would implicate the Democrats and no-one else.

Exactly.

Pete is just gaslighting us.

A lot of people voted for Trump because they thought he’d release the files.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Keen to know where you got your figures. I've seen completely different figures than that.

the figures dont matter unless 100% of kids stay transitioned my point stands. This is the whole argument. You and others appear to be condoning all these safeguards but even then kids have transitioned back with permanent damage to their bodies. So again, unless its 0.000% just 1 kid is too many and proves the system is faulty does it not?
 
Exactly.

Pete is just gaslighting us.

A lot of people voted for Trump because they thought he’d release the files.
Slippery actually believes what he preaches... or the resident cookers he listens to.

Rather concerning that he is so easily brainwashed. Fortunately he only has a few fellow Trumpite lemmings in this thread.
 
the figures dont matter unless 100% of kids stay transitioned my point stands. This is the whole argument. You and others appear to be condoning all these safeguards but even then kids have transitioned back with permanent damage to their bodies. So again, unless its 0.000% just 1 kid is too many and proves the system is faulty does it not?

I absolutely agree that any treatment needs to be research backed, it needs to be closely regulated and monitored, there needs to be strict guidelines and accountability for those who act outside their scope or irresponsibly.

However, your statement is effectively saying that if one child has an adverse reaction to some form of treatment, it should be scrapped entirely, regardless of how many people it helps.

As I’ve said before, this is a high risk population for whom if nothing is done, they will be worse off. If the evidence points towards a certain form of treatment being a net positive for that child, and the family and the child come to that decision in consultation with their doctor, why should the government intervene?

At the moment we’re taking what should be a medical discussion and turning it into an ideological one.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom