2013 Player X v Player Y

[Jessbek]

Jack or Kennedy? (for Moloney)

Jack for great consistency and loads of tackling +4's, Kennedy for cheaper and much higher ceiling. Does attract the tag though. I'm biased, but I'd pick Jack.

 

[JDWCE]

Jack for great consistency and loads of tackling +4's, Kennedy for cheaper and much higher ceiling. Does attract the tag though. I'm biased, but I'd pick Jack.

I would go Jack as well. Kennedy attracts the tag too often for my liking and today scored 112 from 37 possessions. I would want a much bigger return from that many possessions

 

[Shaxx Attaxx]

S selwood or Stanton?

 

[ashley12]

Bye dependent

 

[Patron]

S selwood or Stanton?

Both inconsistent, Scooter depends on how hard he is tagging, Stanton depends on if he gets tagged. Stanton should average more for the year.

 

[Shaxx Attaxx]

It's tough. Out of best av per round I can get. Stanton, Cornes, Barlow, S Selwood, Griffen, Montagna, Masten and Swallow. A lot of questions on all of them. I'm actually leaning towards ball

 

[Patron]

It's tough. Out of best av per round I can get. Stanton, Cornes, Barlow, S Selwood, Griffen, Montagna, Masten and Swallow. A lot of questions on all of them. I'm actually leaning towards ball

The bold are the most proven consistent scorers. Would go with one of those three.

 

[jbiddy89]

Midfielder conundrum for a cover spot in my elite midfield.

Take a punt on Mitchell;
Pick up Ziebell even though he is out until R14 (finals are R15/16); or
Grab someone like Daniel Jackson who is playing well and is getting games but not really that high a DTer.

 

[glasto2010]

Brett Goodes or Jed Adcock for DT Elite?

 

[lmach]

Brett Goodes or Jed Adcock for DT Elite?

Adcock, higher ceiling.

 

[lmach]

I have two decisions to make:

Bartel v N.Riewoldt (same bye, similar price)

and

Jack (521k) v Swallow (461k) v Masten (504k) (all same bye)

 

[Spider Klein]

I have two decisions to make:

Bartel v N.Riewoldt (same bye, similar price)

and

Jack (521k) v Swallow (461k) v Masten (504k) (all same bye)

I think Swallow at his price represents value but Masten keeps scoring this year and would be very unique if your game.

Gibbs v Heppell

Had planned on getting both in next 2 weeks but Now Vlastuin is playing well this is my last back upgrade in the near future as Vlaustuin will hold his own as B6 while I get my mids.

 

[lmach]

I think Swallow at his price represents value but Masten keeps scoring this year and would be very unique if your game.

Gibbs v Heppell

Had planned on getting both in next 2 weeks but Now Vlastuin is playing well this is my last back upgrade in the near future as Vlaustuin will hold his own as B6 while I get my mids.

I'm actually leaning towards Jack now because of his consistency (only 1 score under 99) compared to Swallow's inconsistency. I've decided to avoid Masten for now as I don't like the thought of having three Eagles in my mids (Scooter and Priddis).

Thoughts on Bartel v Riewoldt? Same bye's and Bartel has a pretty good draw coming up.

I would go Gibbs over Heppell at the moment, purely based on priced, couldn't split them otherwise.

 

[Spider Klein]

I'm actually leaning towards Jack now because of his consistency (only 1 score under 99) compared to Swallow's inconsistency. I've decided to avoid Masten for now as I don't like the thought of having three Eagles in my mids (Scooter and Priddis).

Thoughts on Bartel v Riewoldt? Same bye's and Bartel has a pretty good draw coming up.

I would go Gibbs over Heppell at the moment, purely based on priced, couldn't split them otherwise.

Fair call on 3eagles mids although it doesn't always matter.

Yeah Gibbs price appealing.

I like NRoo. He works so hard every game. If saints don't completely suck he will get a lot of marks.

 

[JDWCE]

N Roo for sure. No question marks for me. Bartel has question marks on his role occasionally and may be rested. Saints cant afford to rest Roo

 

[Patron]

I have two decisions to make:

Bartel v N.Riewoldt (same bye, similar price)

and

Jack (521k) v Swallow (461k) v Masten (504k) (all same bye)

Swallow easy.

Riewoldt will be cheaper in a few weeks so if your going one now go bartel.

 

[Shaxx Attaxx]

Start Hutchings or Crouch?

 

[Jcpdragonx]

Start Hutchings or Crouch?

Damn would be great to have this problem. Both sub risks... probably Hutchings because he should get 80+ and Crouch is more likely to be the sub. Then again Crouch has had 2 fully fit games in the SANFL so I don't know if the sub is necessary.

 

[Shaxx Attaxx]

Damn would be great to have this problem. Both sub risks... probably Hutchings because he should get 80+ and Crouch is more likely to be the sub. Then again Crouch has had 2 fully fit games in the SANFL so I don't know if the sub is necessary.

Thanks mate.

Yep just traded Hutchings in though to free up more cash for the long run. Still only have 18 playing with no other emg. I'm leaning towards Hutchings only because he has played well the last 3 games.

 

[lmach]

Swallow easy.

Why Swallow easy? Because of his price? Jack really appeals to me, regardless of his price. He's ultra consistent. Swallow doesn't really tonne up much, only 9 times last year (Jack already has 8 times this year). At this point, I'm not worrying about the price, I want to get who I think will be the best scorer for the rest of the year. So do you think Swallow will score better than Jack?

Riewoldt will be cheaper in a few weeks so if your going one now go bartel.

Hmm, yeah I think I may go Bartel and hope Mackenzie can hold Riewoldt this week like he has done to every other forward he's matched up on. Then I can pick him up for about 450k in a couple of weeks. Plus Bartel has GWS this week.

 

[JDWCE]

Thanks mate.

Yep just traded Hutchings in though to free up more cash for the long run. Still only have 18 playing with no other emg. I'm leaning towards Hutchings only because he has played well the last 3 games.

word that Hutchings didnt board the plane so that may change your plans

 

[Shaxx Attaxx]

Waaaaat. Ohh well to late now. Got crouch as emg

 

[Shaxx Attaxx]

Waaaaat. Ohh well to late now. Got crouch as emg

 

[Patron]

Why Swallow easy? Because of his price? Jack really appeals to me, regardless of his price. He's ultra consistent. Swallow doesn't really tonne up much, only 9 times last year (Jack already has 8 times this year). At this point, I'm not worrying about the price, I want to get who I think will be the best scorer for the rest of the year. So do you think Swallow will score better than Jack?

Hmm, yeah I think I may go Bartel and hope Mackenzie can hold Riewoldt this week like he has done to every other forward he's matched up on. Then I can pick him up for about 450k in a couple of weeks. Plus Bartel has GWS this week.

For me swallow has by far the best value of the above mentioned. I don't really rate Jack any better as a scorer and swallow comes 60k cheaper.

 

[lmach]

For me swallow has by far the best value of the above mentioned. I don't really rate Jack any better as a scorer and swallow comes 60k cheaper.

Ended up going Jack as a bit of a unique. I can't see Swallow scoring 100's consistently, too many 80's for mine. He's also the first to get tagged for North, whereas Jack is behind guys like JPK, Hanneberry and possibly O'Keefe. Plus I feel I need to go unique to climb the rankings.

I actually didn't even realise how unique Jack is. More people own players like Jetta, Motlop and H.Taylor than Jack.