Ant_
Premium Platinum
Don't think Mckenzie will last to pick 26 I reckon he is a lock for the saints at 21 or 22
Yep wonder what Geelong were thinking
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Opening Round
The Golden Ticket - Official AFL on-seller of MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Don't think Mckenzie will last to pick 26 I reckon he is a lock for the saints at 21 or 22
was like this for Macrae and Bonti. Just think he'd add a lot. Again we'll have to agree to disagree about him being able to play the role of a medium forward. He is not a medium forward though
lets face it, we absolutely stink at marking around the ground
I'm not talking about contested marks in the forward line/backline either
but if you look at the amount of marks we take in the midfield compared to the other clubs, I think its alarming how poor it is
sure it will improve
but I don't think another player under the 180cm would be the best bet, I mean AFL players ain't going to let him use them as a step ladder
and AFL players are much better at spoiling the ball, in fact at junior level you won't often see a lot of spoiling from anyone but key defenders
and Dahl and Honey can crumb & kick a goal; read what I replied to
I wasn't discussing McLean
All really depends who we take in the draft now
personally, I hope we only take any other smalls with late picks
Jarrod Garlett/Connor Menadue/Daniel McKenzie/Nathan Drummond
Not sure how he tested, but with him it's more just how hard he runs both ways that impresses me. Great endurance, clean, and remarkable forward play. He's got that Clay Smith touch where he's very clearly a midfielder but looks just as close to home up forward. Really like what he offers as a sort of mid-draft pick.How did Neal-Bullen test for speed at the combine? I think I had seen Gore was pretty quick, solid player as well
don't rate Blakely? Your rookies are also interesting, who is McGuinness? heard the name
think we'd take some mature age talent to
heard a few people mention Marcon, never watched him play though
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I didn't say he'd help with midfield marking, just that is where we need more helpI'm not sure how I'll take it if for the first year since I've followed the draft my favorite player isn't picked by uswas like this for Macrae and Bonti. Just think he'd add a lot. Again we'll have to agree to disagree about him being able to play the role of a medium forward.
I don't think that he takes as many high flying marks as it reported I know of two he has taken this year but he has managed to take a lot of contested marks. Not saying we get him to improve our midfield marking I'm saying he influences games significantly and has elite disposal both on the inside and outside and lowers his eyes naturally when going forward, things that we lack. Skippos had him in his Phantom at our pick in the 40's if we could get him there then we have a player that can play deep forward as like Elliott or playing as an outside mid using his damaging skill set to set up our forwards. I like players who can influence games he does that consistently.
Think that someone like Payne going along with Crameri and Bonti could push up the ground to play that role of marking that you are talking about even a Menadue or another tall midfielder could help out in that regard. When did I say that McLean would help out with our midfield marking? He'd help to solidify our skills, our ability to hit the scoreboard and will help Dahl (I can't see Honey influence games like those two can) get free from tags more often.
Yeah I agree that it wouldn't hurt to add some more grunt in the midfieldNot sure how he tested, but with him it's more just how hard he runs both ways that impresses me. Great endurance, clean, and remarkable forward play. He's got that Clay Smith touch where he's very clearly a midfielder but looks just as close to home up forward. Really like what he offers as a sort of mid-draft pick.
Not sure about Blakely, just haven't been overly impressed by him. Think there's a fair chance he's gone by pick 26 anyway as a bit of a project.
McGuinness is probably the best Tassie prospect this season. He's a really attacking half back flanker with a beautiful kick and nice movement. Poor defensively but as a rookie prospect he's somebody I really like as a bit of a longer-term type.
My view on mature talent is that, while some more would be nice, I think we have young players on pretty much every line that we all hope are getting games next year. Yes, we've lost Griffen, Cooney and Higgins; but most on here tried to drop the latter two numerous times throughout the season. Griffen is a big loss but we have enough young midfield prospects to give another a game there. For experienced/mature types we've still got Morris, Stevens, Crameri, Picken, Minson, Boyd, Murphy and Dickson - how many more do you want? For mine, adding more likely costs youngsters games for role playing stop-gaps. I'm not particularly enamoured by any of the mature prospects that I've seen and I'd rather not just select somebody because they're a bit older. Not fussed if we do pick some up but I'm not a huge fan of the idea. I'd love a mature CHB but I'm not sure there are many around. Happy to just go to the draft and continue the youth policy.
Surely we take some mature/recycled talent in the rookie draft. We need some bodies to help us get through next season.Can't play all my cards before the BF phantom.
I think we're in a pretty good position to take best available to be honest. Tall defenders, tall forwards, speed and skill are all obvious needs; but with Griff out and Boyd probably in his last year (plus injury concerns with Smith and Prudden) I don't think a bit more grunt inside the contest would go astray either. With five picks inside the top 50 we've got some flexibility to just pick the players we think have the best chance of making it at each pick - chances are, if they're good enough, they'll have a role with us as either starting 22, or quality depth.
Something I put together rather quickly:
Pick 26: Connor Menadue (Liam Duggan / Neal-Bullen)
Pick 27: Oscar McDonald (Jarrod Garlett / Matthew Hammelmann)
Pick 39: Matthew Hammelmann (Toby McLean / Brayden Maynard)
Pick 45: Brayden Maynard (Damien Cavka / Daniel Nielsen)
Pick 46: Jack Cripps (Daniel McKenzie / Sean McLaren)
Rookie 1: Josh McGuinness
Rookie 2: Marc Pittonet
Rookie 3: Jake Maher
Rookie 4: Dan Howe
It's really speculative as anything can happen before even our first pick, but these are just some ideas. My point is that we don't have to fret and attempt to reach for needs; with the amount of picks we have in a good range there's a decent chance that we end up covering most of what we need anyway. With my first choices in the main draft we're getting two KPFs (Hammelmann and Cripps), a KPD (McDonald) and two utilities (Menadue and Maynard). We're gaining speed, skill, height and some grunt around the contest as well - a really nice balance there.
I've been wondering about that... how could he be such high odds. Does someone know something we don't? I wouldn't have him at 100/1. No where near the cred or experience required. It worries me to be honest.Surely we take some mature/recycled talent in the rookie draft. We need some bodies to help us get through next season.
And is Monty seriously odds on for our job!?? God I hope not. Fresh blood required.
How did Neal-Bullen test for speed at the combine? I think I had seen Gore was pretty quick, solid player as well
don't rate Blakely? Your rookies are also interesting, who is McGuinness? heard the name
think we'd take some mature age talent to
heard a few people mention Marcon, never watched him play though
He is not a medium forward though
lets face it, we absolutely stink at marking around the ground
I'm not talking about contested marks in the forward line/backline either
but if you look at the amount of marks we take in the midfield compared to the other clubs, I think its alarming how poor it is
sure it will improve
but I don't think another player under the 180cm would be the best bet, I mean AFL players ain't going to let him use them as a step ladder
and AFL players are much better at spoiling the ball, in fact at junior level you won't often see a lot of spoiling from anyone but key defenders
and Dahl and Honey can crumb & kick a goal; read what I replied to
I wasn't discussing McLean
All really depends who we take in the draft now
personally, I hope we only take any other smalls with late picks
Jarrod Garlett/Connor Menadue/Daniel McKenzie/Nathan Drummond
I'm not sure how I'll take it if for the first year since I've followed the draft my favorite player isn't picked by uswas like this for Macrae and Bonti. Just think he'd add a lot. Again we'll have to agree to disagree about him being able to play the role of a medium forward.
I don't think that he takes as many high flying marks as it reported I know of two he has taken this year but he has managed to take a lot of contested marks. Not saying we get him to improve our midfield marking I'm saying he influences games significantly and has elite disposal both on the inside and outside and lowers his eyes naturally when going forward, things that we lack. Skippos had him in his Phantom at our pick in the 40's if we could get him there then we have a player that can play deep forward as like Elliott or playing as an outside mid using his damaging skill set to set up our forwards. I like players who can influence games he does that consistently.
Think that someone like Payne going along with Crameri and Bonti could push up the ground to play that role of marking that you are talking about even a Menadue or another tall midfielder could help out in that regard. When did I say that McLean would help out with our midfield marking? He'd help to solidify our skills, our ability to hit the scoreboard and will help Dahl (I can't see Honey influence games like those two can) get free from tags more often.
Surely we take some mature/recycled talent in the rookie draft. We need some bodies to help us get through next season.
And is Monty seriously odds on for our job!?? God I hope not. Fresh blood required.
That's what has me freaking out, does someone know something we don't? I never would have thought him that high odds it's stupid. Either they believe Monty was behind everything and will get the job because of the cafe and all that rubbish, or they believe the bulldogs are idiots and so are placing the most money on the wrong call.... Neither is flattering really.Sportsbet have taken more money for Monty than for all other candidates combined. They've suspended betting. Unbelievable isn't it?![]()
Dean Gore was the other midfielder that I really liked, didn't mind Blakely eitherNeal Bullen didn't test as he'd have liked for speed but that's not to say he's not fast. Unless you're an outside winger raw straight line speed is really overrated in my eyes. How many of the best players are truly fast in straight lines? I reckon if you got some of the players we considered quick to sprint we'd be surprised at their lack of pace. Speed is just as much about composure and decisions as it is pace. Someone like Neal Bullen isn't incredibly quick in straight lines but he picks the right times to run, runs to the right places, makes the correct decisions, changes directions with intelligence and does all that sort of stuff that allows him to be 'fast' if that makes sense. He's able to break away from the packs like a quick bloke because he's so quick minded that he's always in the position to be able to. That said, he's not by any means slow paced either.
I'm not sure if your marking issue is a team balance issue or a tactical issue. I favour the latter. MacRae for example is one of the most talented mids at the comp at finding uncontested marks. Like not ones where he's in 100 metres of space like wingmen do, but genuine uncontested marks that create options another player wouldn't. Bontempelli is a gifted mark too. Crameri (with the addition of Boyd) should be able to work up a bit more and he's also quite a gifted player at working into space. He could conceivably play a Tomlinson/Tom T. Lynch kind of role this year. A firing (and I think he will next year) Jarrad Grant can provide an option across half forward. Koby Stevens has some real marking talent. I think the framework is there especially if you have a conducive game plan.
Monty has been chucking all his wife's earnings from the cafe on himself on Sportsbet. That's why the odds are now so short.That's what has me freaking out, does someone know something we don't? I never would have thought him that high odds it's stupid. Either they believe Monty was behind everything and will get the job because of the cafe and all that rubbish, or they believe the bulldogs are idiots and so are placing the most money on the wrong call.... Neither is flattering really.
He's not too dissimilar to Lachie Hunter in a lot of areas for mine. He's got great skills and can pull off the ridiculous more often than most but he fades in and out and barely gets a touch when he's "out". Defensive side needs a lot of work. He's a main draft pick but not the top 20 type many have touted him as for mine. Good project and somebody who you'd really want the ball in the hands of. Has the same swagger as Hunter too; knows he can pull off the incredible and will keep taking the difficult option.Tell me about Corey ellis....
I'm not a big fan. I think he's coming from a fair way back in terms of football development and, personally, think you have to have the right attitude and mindset to lift that to AFL standard - I'm not sure he has that. Athletically he has all the tools to be a star but he needs to sort his shit out and really work hard if he wants to be one. A club will take a punt on turning him around somewhere in the 10-30 range, I'd say. Probably closer to 20.Where abouts do you think tom lamb will end up going ?
