2015 General Discussion/Help

[toxic]

Most probably.

Yet you should play grandfinal.
Need another key fwd
no injuries in def
and some serious hard arse grunt in the mids.

I want pav to win a flag b4 he retires

 

[Satan]

Too many unproven melb players

 

[Jiska]

JM hardly ever picks Carlton players in his team.

Always knew he was a SC guru

 

[Big Sauce 21]

Unsure on mayes I'm going to say no from me.
Rich and Hanley likely to play back,Beams now in the mids.
Aish and Lewy and now bundy/Robbo to take points though the mids and forward half.

Mayes will be playing HF and off the wing

 

[manboob]

What's Stevie J's price? 640 odd? Had a shocking end to last year... thinking about him again this year though...

Would have back-to-back Brownlows if he stopped hitting blokes.

 

[toxic]

What's Stevie J's price? 640 odd? Had a shocking end to last year... thinking about him again this year though...

Would have back-to-back Brownlows if he stopped hitting blokes.

He'll be a MASSIV pod

 

[manboob]

He'll be a MASSIV pod

He's not bi-curious this year is he?

 

[toxic]

He's not bi-curious this year is he?

Sadly nope

 

[manboob]

Sadly nope

Hmmm.... still probably grab him cause I'm tragic. I think there's enough bi-curiousity forward to cover my ass.
It just depends on whether they are players I really want to pick or I am just picking them because they go both ways...
Some hard decisions to make.

 

[TheOz]

What's Stevie J's price? 640 odd? Had a shocking end to last year... thinking about him again this year though...

Would have back-to-back Brownlows if he stopped hitting blokes.

$573,200

 

[manboob]

Cheers - it's bad but not that bad.

 

[rocker_oz33]

I had SJ from the start last season he was on fire early 125 av.Shite after creepy crawly got into him.

 

[TheOz]

Dangerfield and Watson also around that price if one wants a bit of value. Griffen to me is the big one, could be the best value premium pick of 2015, could also go horribly wrong.

 

[Daniels]

Dangerfield and Watson also around that price if one wants a bit of value. Griffen to me is the big one, could be the best value premium pick of 2015, could also go horribly wrong.

Banking on Griffen to be the Beams of 2014. Just looking like a perfect M4 type (for now).

 

[toxic]

Banking on Griffen to be the Beams of 2014. Just looking like a perfect M4 type (for now).

Jack steven or

Ultra super unbelievable gifted Premo

Marc Murphy

Gingy

 

[Buddyhell]

Can anyone confirm the change in scoring for RUCKS fr SC 2015?

I have heard on a PODCAST that hit outs scoring has changed - where Sandilands would get 50 only 15 got to advantage.
The scoring was easy as he got 1 x50 hit outs = 50 SC points per game - but they has changed forever.

Now in 2015 you get negative points for a hit out NOT to advantage - extra points for a hit out to advantage.

My question is where do we get those stats as cannot see them anywhere as RUCK position selecting has changed from this new scoring.

Your thoughts?

Cheers

 

[toxic]

Can anyone confirm the change in scoring for RUCKS fr SC 2015?

I have heard on a PODCAST that hit outs scoring has changed - where Sandilands would get 50 only 15 got to advantage.
The scoring was easy as he got 1 x50 hit outs = 50 SC points per game - but they has changed forever.

Now in 2015 you get negative points for a hit out NOT to advantage - extra points for a hit out to advantage.

My question is where do we get those stats as cannot see them anywhere as RUCK position selecting has changed from this new scoring.

Your thoughts?

Cheers

Yes its changed
don't think its been revealed as to the points spread.
im running with
+4 to adv
-2 not to adv

 

[LFC2010]

I'd like the idea of 3 rucks, but why don't they just remove the v/c loop hole all together. Could always make a rule where if the captain is a late withdrawal your 2nd highest scoring player that week gets the captain score by default.

 

[karaoke]

I'd like the idea of 3 rucks, but why don't they just remove the v/c loop hole all together. Could always make a rule where if the captain is a late withdrawal your 2nd highest scoring player that week gets the captain score by default.

Would just end up being a slightly different way of using it, still would be a Capt loophole.

Need to introduce 1.5x or 1.25x for VC score IMO.

 

[GUMBLETRON]

Yes its changed
don't think its been revealed as to the points

Is there a better source for this than Jock ****ing Reynolds? By which I mean any source.

As far as scoring goes, HOs to advantage have always been worth more.

 

[Feerits Elf]

I'd like the idea of 3 rucks, but why don't they just remove the v/c loop hole all together.

Because it's commercially lucrative.

 

[Daniels]

Jack steven

True.

A. Swallow...

 

[D0nk]

Yes its changed
don't think its been revealed as to the points spread.
im running with
+4 to adv
-2 not to adv

So in the example given - Sandilands with 50 hitouts, 15 to advantage.

Current formula: 50 points
Proposed formula: -10 points

Surely they can't be too harsh on the hitouts that don't go to advantage, as the highest percentage is just over 30. It would almost make it not worth picking premium rucks.

 

[Jars458]

So in the example given - Sandilands with 50 hitouts, 15 to advantage.

Current formula: 50 points
Proposed formula: -10 points

Surely they can't be too harsh on the hitouts that don't go to advantage, as the highest percentage is just over 30. It would almost make it not worth picking premium rucks.

That would make no sense to be so punitiive, especially as a hit out is a contested situation and not like a clanger. Plus 5 and minus one would make more sense and perhaps only when they go to disadvantag and not a neutral situation.

 

[toxic]

So in the example given - Sandilands with 50 hitouts, 15 to advantage.

Current formula: 50 points
Proposed formula: -10 points

Surely they can't be too harsh on the hitouts that don't go to advantage, as the highest percentage is just over 30. It would almost make it not worth picking premium rucks.

no idea tbh, maybe neutral hitouts get 1 point as well?