2015; Player X or Player Y or Player Z

[Balony_pony16]

Swan has to be the lockiest lock of all locks this season.

Id go further to say "Swan v (any player)" should be thread banned!!!

 

[Kadog]

Swan has to be the lockiest lock of all locks this season.

In all my squads only 6 have ever remained untouched...swan being one of course.

 

[Mercuri Rising]

In all my squads only 6 have ever remained untouched...swan being one of course.

Yeah, I was going to try to be a special snowflake, but I gave in a few weeks ago and haven't looked back.

 

[KardiniaPark]

D FENCE

Murphy/Haynes

V

Shaw/Langdon


I like Haynes but not as much as I like Shaw. I don't want both.

 

[Judd_Magic]

D FENCE

Murphy/Haynes

V

Shaw/Langdon


I like Haynes but not as much as I like Shaw. I don't want both.

Murphy and Shaw for mine.

 

[Judd_Magic]

Which 2 out of -

B.Smith
R.Murphy
Birchall
H.Shaw
M.Johnson

 

[Samples]

Which 2 out of -

B.Smith
R.Murphy
Birchall
H.Shaw
M.Johnson

Shaw and Smith for me

 

[Determinant]

Which 2 out of -

B.Smith
R.Murphy
Birchall
H.Shaw
M.Johnson

Smith and Shaw for mine, though I prefer Smith and Hampton

 

[KardiniaPark]

Murphy and Shaw for mine.

I don't even...

 

[Jiska]

Cotchin, Dusty, Dangerfield or Griffen

Jesus. Not even given a choice in that lot. Take the Brownlow medalist every day if the week.

 

[Jiska]

Murphy/Haynes
v
Shaw/Langdon

I like Haynes but not as much as I like Shaw. I don't want both.

Sounds like you've answered your own question

 

[KardiniaPark]

Jesus. Not even given a choice in that lot. Take the Brownlow medalist every day if the week.

I'd give Lance Armstrong a Brownlow before that squib Cotchin.

 

[KardiniaPark]

Sounds like you've answered your own question

Yeah I like it with langdon in. Finally happy with my def.

 

[Judd_Magic]

Ok this is for M5.

Which one out of?

B.Crouch
Wines
A.Swallow
J.Steven

 

[toxic]

Ok this is for M5.

Which one out of?

B.Crouch
Wines
A.Swallow
J.Steven

Wines, Oliver Wines

 

[Judd_Magic]

Wines, Oliver Wines

I was thinking B.Crouch myself.

What makes you say Wines for Toxic?

 

[toxic]

I was thinking B.Crouch myself.

What makes you say Wines for Toxic?

In the best team.
if his time on ground % increases from 2014 he should average 110+.
Nothing wrong with crouch tho.

 

[pincrusher]

I personally have both Wines and Crouch at the moment. If I was to choose just one though it would be Wines. The guy is an animal and Crouch has been a little injury prone so far.

 

[Benson FC]

Mumford v Jacobs

At the moment I have Jacobs, but feel he could be over priced. Love his consistency and his ability to play 22 games.
Mumford's ceiling is massive, and I feel he will benefit from the new ruck scoring / a better midfield. Also will be a POD
Thoughts?

 

[pincrusher]

Mumford v Jacobs

At the moment I have Jacobs, but feel he could be over priced. Love his consistency and his ability to play 22 games.
Mumford's ceiling is massive, and I feel he will benefit from the new ruck scoring / a better midfield. Also will be a POD
Thoughts?

Jacobs should be a walk up certainty but injured pre-season and lost about 4 weeks of training IIRC. Playing second fiddle to the rookie ruck in the next NAB game so at this stage I won't be selecting him. Rucks are going to be problematic this year IMO.

 

[d-12]

Mumford v Jacobs

At the moment I have Jacobs, but feel he could be over priced. Love his consistency and his ability to play 22 games.
Mumford's ceiling is massive, and I feel he will benefit from the new ruck scoring / a better midfield. Also will be a POD
Thoughts?

Lock and load Sauce. New ruck points scoring should help him more than others too.

Newnes and Maric

v

Kelly and Naitanui

 

[toxic]

Lock and load Sauce. New ruck points scoring should help him more than others too.

Newnes and Maric

v

Kelly and Naitanui

Newnes and nicnat and pocket the savings

 

[Honeyboy Wilson]

Okay, got an interesting one, as it's not a player vs player per se.

In my Draft league of 10, I managed to draw Pick 3.

That guarantees me one of Ablett, Rockliff, Pendlebury or Fyfe. Nice captain material.

But it also means my next pick isn't until 18.

I really want Robbie Gray - high quality forwards are obviously harder to get than high quality midfielders. Picking him at 3 is a reach - so I'm considering trading down for Pick 6. He won't be there at Pick 18.

That would give me Pick 6 + Pick 15.

So... Pick 6 + Pick 15 (then 26, 35...)

Or Pick 3 + Pick 18 (then 23, 38...)

I just can't decide. Obviously Ablett / Rockliff / Pendlebury / Fyfe straight up against Gray isn't going to go in Gray's favour (although I believe he'll up his output this year), but taking positions into account and upgrading my second pick...

 

[toxic]

Okay, got an interesting one, as it's not a player vs player per se.

In my Draft league of 10, I managed to draw Pick 3.

That guarantees me one of Ablett, Rockliff, Pendlebury or Fyfe. Nice captain material.

But it also means my next pick isn't until 18.

I really want Robbie Gray - high quality forwards are obviously harder to get than high quality midfielders. Picking him at 3 is a reach - so I'm considering trading down for Pick 6. He won't be there at Pick 18.

That would give me Pick 6 + Pick 15.

So... Pick 6 + Pick 15 (then 26, 35...)

Or Pick 3 + Pick 18 (then 23, 38...)

I just can't decide. Obviously Ablett / Rockliff / Pendlebury / Fyfe straight up against Gray isn't going to go in Gray's favour (although I believe he'll up his output this year), but taking positions into account and upgrading my second pick...

If the leagues any good he wont be there at 15. You'd have to take him at 6

 

[Honeyboy Wilson]

If the leagues any good he wont be there at 15. You'd have to take him at 6

Which I'm happy to do - that was the point of my post, taking Gray at 6.

Or should I try and trade lower? Then I start really downgrading my 3rd round, 5th round picks, but upgrading my 2nd, 4th, 6th, etc.)