Gangnam Saint
Club Legend
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2015
- Posts
- 1,535
- Reaction score
- 3,353
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
We need an early second rounder to nab a high qaulity draft slider
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

+1.We need an early second rounder to nab a high qaulity draft slider
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
That'll wipe the cheesey grin off his face.. Great work demons
I hope we can go up the draft, are we still looking to loose a fav MG?
Yes it was, but is that still on the cards?I don't think it was me that said we'd trade a favourite. Was it Brian?
Will be funny when the Dopers pick up Francis then he requests a trade home in 2 years![]()
God, I hope he doesn't nominate us then.
Cant stand to have to deal with that bottom feeder from Essendon again.

But according to some Bomber posters he's a mad Essendon fan who can't wait to get to TullamarineHome is Adelaide, we'd be pretty safe that he's not nominating Saints to get home![]()

Yes it was, but is that still on the cards?
Chances of happening?Not that I'm aware of. There's a couple of fringe players that are open to moving though.
We are after mids and mids only I'd say. Outside players, speed, skill and clearence winners the main priorities.I am making a small mock draft and i wouldn't mind if you could list your top 5 priorities of what you want in the draft if thats ok? Preferably just list a player role/position but if you have an ideal player in mind, you could let me know too. Thank you
Chances of happening?
Yeah, hope we don't have to deal with Essendope EVER again!God, I hope he doesn't nominate us then.
Cant stand to have to deal with that bottom feeder from Essendon again.
omg yesI know that Ameet said no to Hickey leaving but if, and it's a big IF, Richmond offer say Pick 12 would you entertain the idea?
Rumour is that Port knocked back 12 for Lobbe.
When considering our success of this trade period, people need to remember that we lost next year's second round pick in order to secure Freeman. So, talk of "Freeman, Carlisle, and pick 14 for 5+24" being a "great deal" is factually incorrect. Once you factor in next year's second round pick, you'll see that it's not as flash; not so much because next year's second would be a great pick for the draft, but because (I believe) it fairly significantly weakens our trading power in 2016.