Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Bit of putting two and two together to make five here but it looks like an outside runner is a pretty big priority with Cox>Cumming>Williams being our order of preference.

Cedric Cox doesn't win the ball, doesn't have elite speed or agility, Brennan Cox has attitude and work rate issues. Not keen on either.Amazing how we some how have 2 picks in top 30 we are the kings of the trade period.
Imagine if we can get
Marshall
Cox either small one or 194cm one
Long
Guelfi
LOVE DRAFT TIME
Would you rate Wines or Macrae higher?
After reading Quigley's thread, I'm not so keen on Scrimshaw or Battle now. Scrimshaw never really stood out for me and his kicking and contested work has always been an issue, but Quigley's now gotten me uncertain about Battle due to his poor athletic testing at the combine. I don't exactly think Scrimshaw has the discipline to play in the Dogs system, as he doesn't really look to have a defensive game.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
BF groupthink had David Gourdis a top 20 selection back in the day. He went undrafted.
I'm not sold on any player as a "must have" but there's about 10 I'd like at our first two selections.
I'd be happy with SPP at our second pick TBH and I hope we bid on Macreadie/Sproule/Cumming or even all three.
Macreadie seems to have been 'hidden' a little this year for GWS to get him at a later bid (we can't complain after Lachie Hunter's u18 year).
just looking at all the draft talk, getting a massive feeling that 2 of Florent, Berry, Marshall and English will be there at our pick. If English is there could he slip further to our 2nd pick? the reason he would slip to 18 could also be enough for him to slip to our next pick. as i dont see a big need for a ruckman or the time to develop him from the clubs between our picks.
this would be risky but does anyone else have the same feel?
There's no way Marshall gets taken over Florent or English at 18. It depends on how highly we rate Florent, but if Norf pass on him at 11 he will absolutely be there at our pick. Feel like English either goes top 10 or slides way down, but I think either Clayton or whoever Freo's recruitment manager is will take the plunge.just looking at all the draft talk, getting a massive feeling that 2 of Florent, Berry, Marshall and English will be there at our pick. If English is there could he slip further to our 2nd pick? the reason he would slip to 18 could also be enough for him to slip to our next pick. as i dont see a big need for a ruckman or the time to develop him from the clubs between our picks.
this would be risky but does anyone else have the same feel?
No way over English but I could easily see us taking him over Florent.There's no way Marshall gets taken over Florent or English at 18. It depends on how highly we rate Florent, but if Norf pass on him at 11 he will absolutely be there at our pick. Feel like English either goes top 10 or slides way down, but I think either Clayton or whoever Freo's recruitment manager is will take the plunge.
I've heard quite a lot of noise about us liking Florent, rating him as a top-10 talent.No way over English but I could easily see us taking him over Florent.
Really? OK hadn't heard that, which made me think we weren't that interested since we'd heard whispers about others. Good to know.I've heard quite a lot of noise about us liking Florent, rating him as a top-10 talent.
agree that freo and GC are the dangers to take English, but I just feel that if he is there at 18, he'll be there at 26 for us. that is why i would love florent or Berry to be there at 18 as there would be a fair chance at grabbing both florent/berry and English.There's no way Marshall gets taken over Florent or English at 18. It depends on how highly we rate Florent, but if Norf pass on him at 11 he will absolutely be there at our pick. Feel like English either goes top 10 or slides way down, but I think either Clayton or whoever Freo's recruitment manager is will take the plunge.
Agree, but don't want us to take Berry. Feel he'll be off the board by mid-first round anyway.agree that freo and GC are the dangers to take English, but I just feel that if he is there at 18, he'll be there at 26 for us. that is why i would love florent or Berry to be there at 18 as there would be a fair chance at grabbing both florent/berry and English.
Would not Brisbane be a risk, especially with two picks between our first and second?agree that freo and GC are the dangers to take English, but I just feel that if he is there at 18, he'll be there at 26 for us. that is why i would love florent or Berry to be there at 18 as there would be a fair chance at grabbing both florent/berry and English.
would the go home factor be greater for brisbane ? risk developing for 2 years and he wants to leave.Would not Brisbane be a risk, especially with two picks between our first and second?
Or St Kilda?
I can't see him getting to our second.
Both fair points. I just think at some point someone pulls a GC-Wright and just takes him because he's too good to pass up, despite not being a good fit.would the go home factor be greater for brisbane ? risk developing for 2 years and he wants to leave.
as for the saints i would think they like their ruck stocks, and they are at the point were they want to add players that make an impact in 2017
Thats the big risk come draft night, judging who the risks are who might take a player, out of the 4 players i mentioned i just see English being the one who could slip furthur.Both fair points. I just think at some point someone pulls a GC-Wright and just takes him because he's too good to pass up, despite not being a good fit.
Does he do much besides being a good inside mid? Not exactly what we need I reckon. But wouldn't be upset if we took him.Thats the big risk come draft night, judging who the risks are who might take a player, out of the 4 players i mentioned i just see English being the one who could slip furthur.
Willem Drew is a player that if we ended up with our 2nd pick i wouldn't be too upset, to me just seems like the kind of player you want in big finals
im a big believer in building from our midfield, it then pushes guys like wallis macrae hunter to the wings and flanks, i can even see Bont playing a high CHF role in time (not saying we should, just he could)Does he do much besides being a good inside mid? Not exactly what we need I reckon. But wouldn't be upset if we took him.
Yeah absolutely. A little closer to home, Quigley on bigfooty has a unique power rankings, it's refreshing to read.I like that buckenarra had a different view on some of these guys. Guess who's also had a different view on draftees in recent times. Simon dalrymple.
They're all just kids and there are only small degrees of separation between a lot of them.
The media talk us into thinking a certain way on these guys. I'm always interested in a different perspective.
I can confirm that. I spoke to Macreadie's dad just a few days ago. He said Harrison was put in an all Rugby school and didn't speak a word of AFL to anyone. Apparently he donated 3 footy's on his last week at the school and had to explain to them how to play AFL. His dad thought it was all a bit iffy especially as he didn't get to play a lot of footy compared to the Vic boys and was often played at full back. Although even when he was put at CHB his opponent would always take him back to full back.
The expectation is he'll go later in the draft. Three clubs have met with him at his home and we aren't one of them at least at this stage. Hawthorn, Fremantle and West Coast the teams.
Warrnambool is all Rebels now. Falcons start at Colac thru to Geelong and the Surfcoast.Warnambool could be a Falcons player, that area is split between the two clubs.