Duckworth
Peptide Awareness
I still think we need a lock down small, like Bagulay. Not the prettiest role but it is a best 22 role IMO.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Gleeson certainly does run and carry, what games were you watching this year?! What Gleeson doesn't do is defend well. He intercepts and rebounds. Quintessential hbf and I can't see him holding down any other position.Saad fills a huge need. With McGrath likely to play on a wing next season, we have no quick half backs apart from Mckenna. Gleeson is suited to more of a intercept player. Have barely seen him run and carry with the ball.
I swear, one or two poor games and suddenly everyone's got memories like gold fish. The only difficulty confronting ambrose being a lock is hartleys form. But ambrose is a better fit so my money is on him. I agree Francis needs to be squished in somehow but I think that will be off the bench.A
ambrose isn't a lock, I think he will struggle to even get a game.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
i think we should move walla back into mcgraths old spot to allow smith/stringer into the fwd line
Don't want Stringer and Smith in the midfield?
I think that's bang on.
I like it
Mate I've never rated ambrose, he has filled a gap over the years and has got the most out of himself. There's zero offence to his gameI swear, one or two poor games and suddenly everyone's got memories like gold fish. The only difficulty confronting ambrose being a lock is hartleys form. But ambrose is a better fit so my money is on him. I agree Francis needs to be squished in somehow but I think that will be off the bench.
Ambrose is a huge asset for the club. He locks down tight and can run all day.
He's a good player, but will always be limited. Most likely best 22 R1 next year, but if we're not trying to upgrade his position in the side, we're going nowhere.I swear, one or two poor games and suddenly everyone's got memories like gold fish. The only difficulty confronting ambrose being a lock is hartleys form. But ambrose is a better fit so my money is on him. I agree Francis needs to be squished in somehow but I think that will be off the bench.
Ambrose is a huge asset for the club. He locks down tight and can run all day.
The forward line worked with Joey, Hooker, Raz, Walla all kicking over 30 goals. Also, Stewart didn't play till round 6-7?? And kicked over 20. As much as I would love Hooker back, I think he is a forward now.
I don't think Stewart can hold down the full forward spot like Hooker. But he can get up the ground and behind defences to create goals. Stringer will add to this forward line as will Smith, as they can rotate through the mid, as well as Walla, Raz, Laverde and Langford.
Hartley whilst has his limitations, is our tallest defender at 199cm and is needed. I'm hoping Francis can push to take Ambrose's spot, he can peel across to take intersept marks and use his kicking skills to create.
I would go with for round 1.
Baguley Hartley Francis
McKenna Hurley Saad
McGrath Heppell Zaharakis
Stringer Daniher Fantasia
Stewart Hooker Tipungwuti
T- Bell Merrett Parish
Smith Langford Laverde Gleeson
I think most other defenders will always be limited in comparison to ambrose when it comes to endurance. When he is in form he just takes key forwards out of the game completely. When they start moving up field to get their hands on the ball they just don't get away. He is a nightmare opponent in that sense. He also is relatively fresh to the gig so there is room for improvement.He's a good player, but will always be limited. Most likely best 22 R1 next year, but if we're not trying to upgrade his position in the side, we're going nowhere.
I honestly don't know who would actually play man on man defence in that defensive unit. Hurley and Hooker are both better interceptors than actual stoppers, Saad and McKenna need GPS tracking units attached to their man just so they can get a clue where he is and Goddard has never seen a man he dosent want to run off.......B: Saad Hooker Gleeson
HB: Goddard Hurley McKenna
C: McGrath Heppell Zaharakis
HF: Begley Daniher Smith
F: Fantasia Stringer Stewart
R: Bellchambers Zerrett Myers
Int: Langford Walla Laverde Parish
Emg: Colyer Ambrose Mutch
I think hooker forward makes us too top heavy. Hooker is an AA back and relegates Hartley to depth which ks preferable. Ambrose can swap for Gleeson depending on matchups and opposition. I would then use Hooker as an Adam Hunter/Harry Taylor like swingman with stints forward.
Stringer forward with daniher and stewart gives us diversity. Further laverde, langford and begley can rotate with stringer through the midfield and give stewart a chop out as a third tall. Walla, smith and fanta make an exciting small mix forward of centre and through the midfield rotation.
Mcgrath can play wing with saad taking his place as a rebounding defender. Goddard rotates with Zerrett through the midfield and half back as they did throughout this year.
This side is balanced and i think has enough attack and defence to be quality. A lot hinges on the development of laverde, langford and begley into the big bodied midfielders that werent available this offseason.
Disagree. Hooker has towelled up a number of the oppositions best forwards when he was AA and playing defence. I remember one game where geelong beat us by 8 goals and Hawkins still didnt get a touch on Hooker. Would take the monsters that Ambrose and Hartley have shown an inability to play on.I honestly don't know who would actually play man on man defence in that defensive unit. Hurley and Hooker are both better interceptors than actual stoppers, Saad and McKenna need GPS tracking units attached to their man just so they can get a clue where he is and Goddard has never seen a man he dosent want to run off.......
It has got nothing to do with being "bright and shiney".I think most other defenders will always be limited in comparison to ambrose when it comes to endurance. When he is in form he just takes key forwards out of the game completely. When they start moving up field to get their hands on the ball they just don't get away. He is a nightmare opponent in that sense. He also is relatively fresh to the gig so there is room for improvement.
He is no longer a bright and shiney new thing at the club, that is the problem on this board
I really hope Langford and laverde come on this year. 3 years in the system time to shine ladsB: Saad Hooker Gleeson
HB: Goddard Hurley McKenna
C: McGrath Heppell Zaharakis
HF: Begley Daniher Smith
F: Fantasia Stringer Stewart
R: Bellchambers Zerrett Myers
Int: Langford Walla Laverde Parish
Emg: Colyer Ambrose Mutch
I think hooker forward makes us too top heavy. Hooker is an AA back and relegates Hartley to depth which ks preferable. Ambrose can swap for Gleeson depending on matchups and opposition. I would then use Hooker as an Adam Hunter/Harry Taylor like swingman with stints forward.
Stringer forward with daniher and stewart gives us diversity. Further laverde, langford and begley can rotate with stringer through the midfield and give stewart a chop out as a third tall. Walla, smith and fanta make an exciting small mix forward of centre and through the midfield rotation.
Mcgrath can play wing with saad taking his place as a rebounding defender. Goddard rotates with Zerrett through the midfield and half back as they did throughout this year.
This side is balanced and i think has enough attack and defence to be quality. A lot hinges on the development of laverde, langford and begley into the big bodied midfielders that werent available this offseason.
B: Saad Hooker Gleeson
HB: Goddard Hurley McKenna
C: McGrath Heppell Zaharakis
HF: Begley Daniher Smith
F: Fantasia Stringer Stewart
R: Bellchambers Zerrett Myers
Int: Langford Walla Laverde Parish
Emg: Colyer Ambrose Mutch
I think hooker forward makes us too top heavy. Hooker is an AA back and relegates Hartley to depth which ks preferable. Ambrose can swap for Gleeson depending on matchups and opposition. I would then use Hooker as an Adam Hunter/Harry Taylor like swingman with stints forward.
Stringer forward with daniher and stewart gives us diversity. Further laverde, langford and begley can rotate with stringer through the midfield and give stewart a chop out as a third tall. Walla, smith and fanta make an exciting small mix forward of centre and through the midfield rotation.
Mcgrath can play wing with saad taking his place as a rebounding defender. Goddard rotates with Zerrett through the midfield and half back as they did throughout this year.
This side is balanced and i think has enough attack and defence to be quality. A lot hinges on the development of laverde, langford and begley into the big bodied midfielders that werent available this offseason.
Seniors:
FB: Gleeson - Hartley - Ambrose
HB: McKenna - Hurley - Saad
MF: Zaharakis - Merrett - Smith
HF: Stringer - Daniher - McDonald-Tipungwuti
FF: Fantasia - Hooker - Stewart
OB: Bellchambers - Heppell - D Parish
IC: Langford - Laverde - Goddard - Redman
Reserves:
FB: Ridley - DP/DFA - Baguley
HB: DP/DFA - Brown - McNiece
MF: DP/DFA - Myers - Mutch
HF: Begley - DP/DFA - DP/DFA
FF: Green - DP/DFA - Draper
OB: Leuenberger - Clarke - C Parish
IC: DP/DFA - DP/DFA - DP/DFA - DP/DFA




