Obese Arachnid
Diplomatic Immunity
- Jan 11, 2008
- 25,726
- 95,640
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- There are no other teams.
I feel for you bro
I have the opposite feeling from that glorious song
-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Teams 2019 Rate My Team (Pre JLT)
- Thread starter Jcpdragonx
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
- Status
- Jul 21, 2008
- 13,768
- 13,407
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Bombers,Jazz,49'ers,Rafa
You definitely have a point but at the moment when i say its a good structure i basically mean that its a 'safe' distribution of cash used on rookies/MPs/Premiums. For instance, if you look at the total number of rookies, there are more in the midfield and less in backs and forwards which means in terms of probabilities its more likely that there will be more mid rookies playing than backline/forwardline rookies. Thus, a team 'structure' (or 'distribution') that has more midfield rookies on field than backs/forwards is theoretically 'safer' than one which has more backs/forwards. Immediately i think playing 2/3/0/2 rookies appeals to me as a 'safe structure'. That said, you are correct in that having a certain structure doesn't really make a team better or worse particularly at this stage of the pre-season.
Here2tellyouwhy
SA GREAT
With my 50k should I make it a pool party so we can all have swimming and ****?
- Thread starter
- #454
Save $300 for a show and $1000 on coke please
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
gutsroy
Brownlow Medallist
When he tells me there'll be a swimming & **** party but doesn't have Wattsdog at F1:
Here2tellyouwhy
SA GREAT
Watts doesnt equal 50k mate
Obese Arachnid
Diplomatic Immunity
- Jan 11, 2008
- 25,726
- 95,640
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- There are no other teams.
- Jun 7, 2011
- 5,180
- 13,699
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
****ing amateur hour over here
- Sep 9, 2016
- 5,983
- 14,533
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Team doesn’t have 1$ left over
Tell me if it’s pox
Backs Whitfield Williams blakely b Smith Collins burgess bench Wilkie meclennan
Mids Cripps dusty fyfe Oliver Neale Walsh b Smith Bewley bench stocker Atkins hind
Rucks Grundy Gawn bench O’Brien
Forwards danger gray Greene
Rankine setterfield Corbett
Bench Shultz Parker
Very guns and rooks
Greene is a Keeper so have 13 keepers and b Smith
Plenty of Gold Coast rookies which helps with the byes
Bit thin maybe ?
Tell me if it’s pox
Backs Whitfield Williams blakely b Smith Collins burgess bench Wilkie meclennan
Mids Cripps dusty fyfe Oliver Neale Walsh b Smith Bewley bench stocker Atkins hind
Rucks Grundy Gawn bench O’Brien
Forwards danger gray Greene
Rankine setterfield Corbett
Bench Shultz Parker
Very guns and rooks
Greene is a Keeper so have 13 keepers and b Smith
Plenty of Gold Coast rookies which helps with the byes
Bit thin maybe ?
- Dec 3, 2017
- 17,116
- 56,439
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
I like the premo's, but 4 x 180k+ priced rookies will slow your cash generation unless they're all averaging 80+ .
I realise rookies are just place holders this time of year, it's the amount of $ outlay that seems OTT to me. Bunch of premium priced rookies rarely = stronger team.
The advantage of having pricey rookies as placeholders is it's easier to keep your preferred structure and even strengthen it when rookies are named. Whereas if you have all cheap rookies you're probably going to have to lose a premo or two.
- Dec 3, 2017
- 17,116
- 56,439
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
I get that, they're place holders for now which help hold desired structure. I'm questioning whether they would actually start with 4x 180k+ rookies come round one.
toxic
Hall of Famer
Never
- Dec 3, 2017
- 17,116
- 56,439
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
4 is excessive. Although I do recall seeing a few teams on here last year that started with combo's of Naughton + 2 of Brayshaw/Dow/LDU + 1 of Rayner/DFog which wouldn't have turned out too well
Agree 100%
I’ve got currently got Bailey Smith who I think will win the rising star not sure how he will go in SC, averaged 125 at tac cup.
Is Sam Collins a lock? Cause I don’t trust Dew. Thompson & Hombsch will be first choice surely. Logue a better choice for JS.
Rankine a big no @ 198k small fwd playing for GC
Last edited:
WaynesWorld19
Post-Human
Based on last year, is ant Rookie likely to be worth $180K plus ? ......I've currently got Rozee, has DPP status & likely to get a lot of games .....but his scoring alone hardly justifies his $189K price tag
Hoping Bennell gets up at $167K
....but that's been the same the last 3 pre-seasons Is Collins really worth $188K as a DEF ? .....struggling to see the value there
WaynesWorld19
Post-Human
Agree, Bailey Smith looks ATS the best of a bad lot of premium rookies .....Sam Walsh anyone ?
- Dec 3, 2017
- 17,116
- 56,439
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
Sam Walsh could be 1 expensive rook that might pay off. Depends on his role though. I think he can junk up and go 75+ if they play him at half back this year, kind of like Essendon did with McGrath in his rookie year.
toxic
Hall of Famer
Messing around with
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
toxic
Hall of Famer
WaynesWorld19
Post-Human
Just reviewing my team & keepers .....awful lot of R12 Bye players ....Hawthorn, Bulldogs, Freo, Port, St Kilda, Essendon
Currently have 16 x R12 players in my team ....Rookies don't bother me, but the keepers do
Currently have 16 x R12 players in my team ....Rookies don't bother me, but the keepers do
toxic
Hall of Famer
2/10 for you
- Status
