Remove this Banner Ad

Position 2021 Forwards

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Nov 6, 2003
Posts
129,886
Reaction score
183,338
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
🇦🇺 🇦🇺 🇦🇺 West Adelaide
Such Value this Season for FWD's .....do you break the cardinal rule and select one of the bargain KPF's ; Brown, Joey Daniher, or even Buddy

Does Ziebell provide the value at $257K that we dare to hope for under a new Coach ......Mid or Def minutes?

Can Cockatoo become another BRIS success story for a GEEL injury prone player .....and finally show us his precocious talent

New Season, time to post thoughts ......for me Danger's time has passed, it's a no from me
 
I think Danger will blossom with having Cameron at the Cats but he is a bit like Dusty and can start slowly. Marshall will probably the most picked forward having dual position and hopefully will be a 110+ average with 20 minute quarters again.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Thoughts on Zorko...almost 32 is he a viable option?

Even if he gets around 95SC points ave he seems like a solid pick for his price.

No harm starting him imo.

Just be prepared to keep a trade handy for him as he will probably get injured at some point being an old campaigner.
 
Last edited:
Dunkley and Marshall locked in at F1 and F2.

Brown and Ziebell at F3 and F4 then Cockatoo and Rowe at F5 and F6.
Not bad, not bad at all JM...

But you need moar of this splendid DPP fwd/def 102k kent bruvs...

Capture.PNG

Consume intoxicants.GIF
 
Marshall a must for me. And will be a decent ruck back up if a ruck goes down.
Also strong possibility of more injury concerns with a 33 yo Ryder .....but still open minded to Ladhams & potentially saving $100K
 
What’s the fascination with Dunkley?

Playing in a team full of mids, only so many points to go around.

Are we expecting him to be full time mid?

Dogs have promised him more mid time after the failed trade request to the bombers.

Even if Dunks plays a bit forward he will still average 95 + imo.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Dogs have promised him more mid time after the failed trade request to the bombers.

Even if Dunks plays a bit forward he will still average 95 + imo.

Wait and see I guess for me.
I imagine all the other mids who are wanting more mid time only have to complain now to get it.
Great player but sceptical of Bulldogs plans.
 
Wait and see I guess for me.
I imagine all the other mids who are wanting more mid time only have to complain now to get it.
Great player but sceptical of Bulldogs plans.

We have to watch pre season games to get a better indication I guess.
 
What’s the fascination with Dunkley?

Playing in a team full of mids, only so many points to go around.

Are we expecting him to be full time mid?
imo it’s because he can be picked as a forward, you would think he would be a top 10 forward so makes it a easy selection.
 
Tom Phillips campaigners, get on!

Blow or thank me later.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Also strong possibility of more injury concerns with a 33 yo Ryder .....but still open minded to Ladhams & potentially saving $100K

Unless you plan on running down Lycett with your car, I wouldn't touch Ladhams. Won't score well unless he's sole ruck.
 
Hmmm, Danger or Dunkley? 🤔
Danger always seems to dip from his initial price, I reckon he's an ideal target for your first upgrade. You'd think he'll be top 3 FWD so you definitely want him at some stage.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom