D
Del125763
Guest
Nah I did my A-levels overseas.Love your obsession with hating Hale [emoji23] I'm guessing you're Scotch or Christchurch?
On Pixel 6 using BigFooty.com mobile ap
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Nah I did my A-levels overseas.Love your obsession with hating Hale [emoji23] I'm guessing you're Scotch or Christchurch?
On Pixel 6 using BigFooty.com mobile ap
i did notice this one and i'll be having a go myselfPeatling price seems overs on topsport as well, kicked three goals three times in a row earlier in the season, still no greene so should be up front as a small
2/3/4 @ 6.25/26/81
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
No current season stats available
TopSport price for Fyfe 2+ Goals drifted out a bit from team release last night. Went from $3 to $3.25. Maybe they know something is going on?
Sportsbet have him at $2.02 for 2+ Goals . Fyfes good hands and good aerial mark, means he will be involved in score involvements.
Griffin Logue from the games ive watched him this year, a bit like the Moore experiment with Collingwood (from last year), dont think has worked. He doesnt look a natural forward mover for me, despite plucking the odd mark here or there in the forward line. Taberner, Lobb, Jye Amiss, Frederick (who has been named in centre) , Fyfe, Meek are all ahead of him in the pecking order. One thing about the lineup listed by Freo last night, is it looks a bit short on paper. (Fyfe is the tallest in the forward line at 191 cm) They are going to have throw one of the big talls in there during the game against this Giants defence that 62 and 69 points in the last 2 weeks.
I think there is a bit of value in the Geelong v West Coast game. Darling at 2.19 for 2+ Goals for me screams value without: Kennedy, Rioli, Waterman and should be around the evens mark. You could also look at Ryan or Rioli but I dont think both will get multiple goals. I can see maybe 1 of them going off but not both.
Brisbane v Demons is also a game Im going to be a bit picky
Using a bit of my TopSport bonus:
Ill go for goals:
Darling 2+ , McStay 2+ , Fyfe 2+ @ $26 using the TopSport TopUp token (im happy to take anything even in the mid teens)
and if it lands on an odd number of goals combined
Darling 2+, McStay 3+ @ 19.71
Darling 3+, McStay 2+ @ 14.72
McStay 2+, Fyfe 3+ @ 29.60
McStay 3+, Fyfe 2+ @ 29.25
Darling 2+, Fyfe 3+ @ 20.26
Darling 3+, Fyfe 2+ @ 14.95
And doubles on triple goals
Darling 3+, McStay 3+ @ 41.40
Darling 3+, Fyfe 3+ @ 42.55
McStay 3+, Fyfe 3+ @ 83.25
Darling 3+ , McStay 3+ , Fyfe 3+ @ 382.95 TopSport
Feel like the lineup and position Mark McVeigh has lined up, im willing to give him a 3rd chance. I think there will be goals in this game. A bit of light drizzle may mean the Giants are forced to kick long and to a contest, rather than stat plod for AFL Fantasy points. (I genuinely believe McVeigh has some interest in AFL Fantasy or something)
No current season stats available
I've ****ed up big time.you can get Robbie Gray 9 on the pointsbet spread which seems much better value than the fixed odds.. it is a definite low floor/high ceiling bet... surely he at least snags 1 which is only a $30 loss if he kicks 1.0 ... If he starts getting cheapies and kicks 3/4 it'll be a very tidy profit.. im hedging slightly by taking a $5 per point lower stake on Marshall and Georgides

Poor bastard thinks he's gonna get $500 if Gray kicks 2 goals and it's entirely my fault * me![]()
to break even on this bet. Gray needs to kick 1.3, if he kicks 2.0 you are effectively getting odds of $3 for that to occur, anything more is a real bonus.I've *ed up big time.
I misunderstood this and thought that if Gray scored more than 9 points, that your stake would be multiplied by 50. Obviously that's not the case & x50 is the maximum it can be multiplied.
This would be fine as I've only chucked on $3.20 so max $30 loss.
Thing is I've given my mate false info and he's gone and chucked $10 in, max $90 loss.
I haven't told him about my realisation.
Is anyone able to tell me what Gray has to score for us both to get our money back?
Poor bastard thinks he's gonna get $500 if Gray kicks 2 goals and it's entirely my fault * me![]()
$1 stake, means you win $3 , if Gray scores 12 points Exactly.I've *ed up big time.
I misunderstood this and thought that if Gray scored more than 9 points, that your stake would be multiplied by 50. Obviously that's not the case & x50 is the maximum it can be multiplied.
This would be fine as I've only chucked on $3.20 so max $30 loss.
Thing is I've given my mate false info and he's gone and chucked $10 in, max $90 loss.
I haven't told him about my realisation.
Is anyone able to tell me what Gray has to score for us both to get our money back?
Poor bastard thinks he's gonna get $500 if Gray kicks 2 goals and it's entirely my fault * me![]()
Thanks mate, sorry I'm a little slow today.$1 stake, means you win $3 , if Gray scores 12 points Exactly.
a $10 stake, means you win $30 , if Gray scores 12 points Exactly.
a $50 stake, means you win, (12-9)x $50 = $150, if Gray scores 12 points Exactly.
If Gray miraculously scores 60 points, your limited to winnings of $50, using a $1 staking system. (not $51)
If he scores 18 pts , you win moreThanks mate, sorry I'm a little slow today.
If he scores 18 points what would my stake be multiplied by?
Had to bail on a holiday due to Covid - fair bit of play money for punting now. Fire up degens