- Mar 20, 2013
- 4,948
- 4,982
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
I’m not sure the named last on bench means a lot but most of those ins are improvements to the team not just fringe
His sub risk in general does seem high
Position 2024 Fantasy Rookies
- Thread starter WaynesWorld19
- Start date
- Tagged users None
His sub risk in general does seem high
- Mar 20, 2013
- 4,948
- 4,982
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Actually he coukd be a decent option instead of Campbell or Cadman. His JS is definitely high
Currently my utility in the hope he is your backup ruck and does enough to get ruck dpp by rnd 6 to go straight to R3.
- Mar 20, 2013
- 4,948
- 4,982
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
He will be backup ruck but how much will it take to get dpp. I’d imagine ROB will get significant majority so I wouldn’t bank on his chop out being enough for dpp but it’s an interesting thought
- Mar 20, 2013
- 4,948
- 4,982
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
I’ve just had another look at cadman
For those worried about Campbell scoring with needing 2 goals to get to 60, are you not concerned Cadman needed 2 goals to get to 47?
And re job security/sub risk, it feels stronger but after playing 12 games last year and 4 of those subbed off, how different is it in reality now? Better surely but by how much?
And in those games he averaged 24, rebatable his average in unvested games is the same as vested.
His 47 is 10 points better than his 2023 season high so that st least points to a player with n the up but I’m not sure if that stat is a positive or a negative!
And he’s still a key forward!
I’m considering him but it’s lot of faith in backing the fact he was a pick 1, natural development and in reality the next 2 weeks hoping he can jag a 4 goal haul or 2 as without that draw I doubt anyone would be giving him much thought based on the evidence
For those worried about Campbell scoring with needing 2 goals to get to 60, are you not concerned Cadman needed 2 goals to get to 47?
And re job security/sub risk, it feels stronger but after playing 12 games last year and 4 of those subbed off, how different is it in reality now? Better surely but by how much?
And in those games he averaged 24, rebatable his average in unvested games is the same as vested.
His 47 is 10 points better than his 2023 season high so that st least points to a player with n the up but I’m not sure if that stat is a positive or a negative!
And he’s still a key forward!
I’m considering him but it’s lot of faith in backing the fact he was a pick 1, natural development and in reality the next 2 weeks hoping he can jag a 4 goal haul or 2 as without that draw I doubt anyone would be giving him much thought based on the evidence
I currently have him but i feel awful about it, i think his scoring potential sucks and banking on the two easy match ups is dangerous. He is no guarantee to kick 3+ and he might need that just to get to a respectable score.
Him and Gibcus are the two i am currently only going to use and an absolute last resort. Surely we get better in round 1 than those 2? SURELY!
- Mar 20, 2013
- 4,948
- 4,982
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
More of Cadman, I’ve just looked at the comparable players that come to mind recently who were high key forwards getting games early.
There’s actually a lot to benchmark with which is nice.
Looking both at what may be reasonable to expect as a average as well as the progression year 1 to 2 (and included 3rd)
Max king
- 41, 54, 62
Thilthorpe
- 51, 57, 52
Ben King
- 39, 38, 50
JUH
-42, 44, 60
McDonald
- 43, 48, 54
It’s been a pretty good exercise to do with takeaways being
It’s really again coming back to a 2 week reliance on this fixture but even then what’s the ceiling?
There’s actually a lot to benchmark with which is nice.
Looking both at what may be reasonable to expect as a average as well as the progression year 1 to 2 (and included 3rd)
Max king
- 41, 54, 62
Thilthorpe
- 51, 57, 52
Ben King
- 39, 38, 50
JUH
-42, 44, 60
McDonald
- 43, 48, 54
It’s been a pretty good exercise to do with takeaways being
- year1-2 change is minimal to none with an average of 5, this is inflated even by M Kings 13
- a mid 50s Ave puts him in the upper echelon, mid 40s more realistic.
- Cadman is well below any of these as a base so you’d hope he improves by more than the average of 5 (placing him
It’s really again coming back to a 2 week reliance on this fixture but even then what’s the ceiling?
I'm not going Campbell either. He is a classic trap. But last listed on bench? Not sure that means much. Midget Baker is listed at CHF.
- Mar 20, 2013
- 4,948
- 4,982
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Burgess scoring history is horrific though too
The 1 year it doesn’t make you puke he was Rick in a ruck injury crisis. Otherwise he can’t crack a 30 either
You’d think he now has opportunity and he’s developed more with 2 string vfl seasons but can anyone shed light on how he managed only 22 in his 1 game… a full game against north Melbourne?! The fact it was rd 24 and they lost comfortably the only saving grace I can see to give any excuse
Banking the price rise from Campbell 60 is increasingly appealing!
The 1 year it doesn’t make you puke he was Rick in a ruck injury crisis. Otherwise he can’t crack a 30 either
You’d think he now has opportunity and he’s developed more with 2 string vfl seasons but can anyone shed light on how he managed only 22 in his 1 game… a full game against north Melbourne?! The fact it was rd 24 and they lost comfortably the only saving grace I can see to give any excuse
Banking the price rise from Campbell 60 is increasingly appealing!
Cadman at F8 for me, will be a slow burn with the possibility of a spike score in rnds 1 & 2, Scored a 59 in the praccy with only 1 goal but interestingly 4 HO's. His JS looks pretty solid with others like Wehr/Taylor/McMullins looking much more likely. If Cadman scores a fifty in rnd 1 he'll go up by $50k
Huge revenge game for him first up v GC too...
Surely a Lazaro or D Wilson as your sub?
Campbell looked really good from my perspective last week. Shining light in a pretty average game for the Tigers.
I would say Mansell as the sub is more likely tomorrow night.
In saying that he's not currently in my side but I think he'll be a decent rookie, albeit might be a bit of a slow burn. But a couple of 60's will get that cash gen going.
I would say Mansell as the sub is more likely tomorrow night.
In saying that he's not currently in my side but I think he'll be a decent rookie, albeit might be a bit of a slow burn. But a couple of 60's will get that cash gen going.
Have them fwd / mid bench
bettingonbetts
Team Captain
- Oct 10, 2016
- 438
- 376
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Gotta happen if Thilthorpe ain’t there!
bettingonbetts
Team Captain
- Oct 10, 2016
- 438
- 376
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Cadman is a no for me. Feel like he’s definitely improving however could get a lazy 20 in there.
Eek
Not risking that
Eek
Not risking that
Happy enough to have Campbell at $200k with a 61 locked in already.
All he has to do is breathe on field this week with a negative break even and he'll lock in a $60k increase from his 2 game price rise.
Anything more than a zero is money in the bank on top of that $60k
All he has to do is breathe on field this week with a negative break even and he'll lock in a $60k increase from his 2 game price rise.
Anything more than a zero is money in the bank on top of that $60k
- Mar 20, 2013
- 4,948
- 4,982
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Those plus I’m happy enough with Reid now as my other defensive one
I’m not picking Windsor so it’s really just that 1 spot I’m grappling with.
WaynesWorld19
Moderator
- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #270
How long is Thilthorpe out?
WaynesWorld19
Moderator
- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #272
12-14 weeks ....that said, Burgess is not a lock, battling the role with Gollant
Do we have a timeframe for Tex?
Milo Cyrus
Premiership Player
- Feb 22, 2021
- 3,655
- 5,519
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Should be good to go next week by the sounds of it.
bettingonbetts
Team Captain
- Oct 10, 2016
- 438
- 376
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Burgees is a lock pending other rookies. Even if Tex is back, Burgees is back up ruck I think he gets the nod ahead of Gollant.
