Utter garbage.That's the furthest thing from the truth. Crowd numbers, merch numbers and membership numbers pale in comparison to the money the broadcasters put into the game.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Utter garbage.That's the furthest thing from the truth. Crowd numbers, merch numbers and membership numbers pale in comparison to the money the broadcasters put into the game.
How is it garbage when tv rights would account for 60% or more of the total revenue generated by the game?Utter garbage.
How is it garbage when tv rights would account for 60% or more of the total revenue generated by the game?
How is it garbage when tv rights would account for 60% or more of the total revenue generated by the game?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Sponsorship is predicated on TV broadcast rights. Youi aren't paying the lions millions to have their logo plastered on the Gabba, likewise Emirates aren't paying collingwood millions for the same reason. AFL tv rights is the largest single entity that contribute to the games income, likewise, it also creates a snowball effect. Without TV rights, you don't get sponsorship and so on. Rob's comment was ignorant, because anyone who knows anything about sporting codes (not even the AFL) recognises that TV > everything. That's why we have thursday night football. It has a negative effect on crowds, but sponsors and tv networks want it.You might be confusing the AFL with the NRL?
AFL distributions represenet about 35% of AFL club revenues....TV is probably 25% of total revenues at most
![]()
The AFL and clubs top 1.944b in Revenue for 2024 - SportsIndustryAU
With all AFL clubs now reporting in for the year, its time to take a look at the goodies contained in their annual reports.footyindustry.com
Anyone that thinks it’s merch or crowds that drive the significant revenues in afl clearly has no idea about the business of sport.
Sponsorship is predicated on TV broadcast rights.
Without TV rights, you don't get sponsorship and so on.
Rob's comment was ignorant, because anyone who knows anything about sporting codes (not even the AFL) recognises that TV > everything.
That's why we have thursday night football. It has a negative effect on crowds, but sponsors and tv networks want it.
Anyone that thinks it’s merch or crowds that drive the significant revenues in afl clearly has no idea about the business of sport.
So… still at least 50% revenue directly from media.And anyone that thinks they dont, doesnt belong in an AFL industry forum, also writing off $430m in club revenue alone (32%). The AFL generated 29m from Medallion club members at Marvel, and an unknown amount from 65,000 AFL members, and finals gate reciepts.
thats just being willfully ignorant.
So… still at least 50% revenue directly from media.
But really all other revenues are indirectly impacted if there’s impacts to the tv dollar too.
Plus, the reverse is true: TV revenue is impacted by attendances. Sports with large crowds/good atmosphere make for a better TV spectacle, thereby increasing the value of the rights. Hence during the pandemic they added canned crowd noise to the TV broadcasts.Try again - did the maths on that for you guys already.
Its 23% across the league. 28% across the clubs.
- AFL distribution 28% (includes tv rights)
- Gate/Members 29%
- Sponsorship 23%
- Merchandise 3%
- Other 17% (pokies, finance and other non football)
Crowds and memberships arent impacted by tv.
Plus, the reverse is true: TV revenue is impacted by attendances. Sports with large crowds/good atmosphere make for a better TV spectacle, thereby increasing the value of the rights. Hence during the pandemic they added canned crowd noise to the TV broadcasts.
How is it garbage when tv rights would account for 60% or more of the total revenue generated by the game?
Spot on.You made that figure up.
Matchday income for most clubs would be far more significant than TV rights. Grand final day alone the AFL would pull something close to $50 million, nearly 10% of their total TV rights income.
Not suggesting TV rights aren't significant, but match day receipts (including memberships and corporate facilities) for the AFL and it's clubs would raise more money overall. It's very different to the NRL.
Don't think so. If so NRL for example wouldn't be on par or ahead of AFL when it comes to TV viewership, as it get's half the crowds of AFL in general.Plus, the reverse is true: TV revenue is impacted by attendances. Sports with large crowds/good atmosphere make for a better TV spectacle, thereby increasing the value of the rights. Hence during the pandemic they added canned crowd noise to the TV broadcasts.
Also, the AFL own the Docklands because of the massive attendances that were guaranteed when it was first built. The claim that crowds aren't a significant driver of finances is absurd.
This is a false picture.Try again - did the maths on that for you guys already.
Its 23% across the league. 28% across the clubs.
- AFL distribution 28% (includes tv rights)
- Gate/Members 29%
- Sponsorship 23%
- Merchandise 3%
- Other 17% (pokies, finance and other non football)
Crowds and memberships arent impacted by tv.
This is a false picture.
The_Wookie . Not trying to steal Dave10's thunder here - but is it time to start a 2025 Financial Reporting Thread? First cab off the rank (Demons) has been published. Report is here, but looks like the link is embargoed until 1st of December, AGM is the 16th of December.
![]()
2025 Financial Result
Following a year of significant change, Melbourne Football Club has announced an operating loss of $200,000 for the 2025 financial year.www.melbournefc.com.au