Game Day 2024 Non-Swans Game Day

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

They look the most vulnerable but what if they just keep winning haha


then they make it...

im just guessing here , haven't got a delorian .

Look at least year round 9 we weren't in the 8 etc
 
Nobody does! It's all in good fun to see who ends up getting close


I saw Hawthorn Stkilda and Adelaide all get either robbed or piss away the done game

They also have history of looking great early and fading, seems more likely they fall than not,
But one day they will make it so could happen.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Sorry. I'm a little sensitive about this tragedy.

Only missing Brown. Isaac Cumming and Adam Kennedy are both pretty big outs as well but they'll need to get used to being without them for a while. Cogs after a fair lay off as well. Green was touch and go.

I don't rate them as highly as others, including the bookies, do but not gonna judge them on the Essendon game They were horrendous. Think without going into the sheds at half-time they still win it. Bombers play ugly football that won't stand up.
No need to be sorry, mate! Hope you are doing ok
 
This weekend had it all - but in the end the Swans are on top of the ladder.

Bombers with a piss weak % that is going to bite them on the arse I reckon.

View attachment 1987319
Probably won't bite them too much I think with that draw. will land above or below teams by 2 points somewhere. Had they lost to Collingwood by a point they'd be 8th instead of 3rd, though. Fine margins and all that, don't think they'll play finals either way.
 
Last edited:
Interested in other people's opinions on the Jeremy Cameron situation.

Given how cautious our club has been with the McCartin brothers wellbeing it annoys the shit out of me that the AFL gave Geelong the all clear on this.

Geelong's excuse was that they tried to get Cameron off the ground and he refused. Surely Geelong are responsible for their own players response to this?

It sets a precedent where clubs can simply ignore protocol because "the player didn't want to leave the ground". What a load of crap. The club is ultimately responsible for the instructions a player does or doesn't follow on the ground. This sets a really stupid and dangerous precedent.
 
Interested in other people's opinions on the Jeremy Cameron situation.

Given how cautious our club has been with the McCartin brothers wellbeing it annoys the s**t out of me that the AFL gave Geelong the all clear on this.

Geelong's excuse was that they tried to get Cameron off the ground and he refused. Surely Geelong are responsible for their own players response to this?

It sets a precedent where clubs can simply ignore protocol because "the player didn't want to leave the ground". What a load of crap. The club is ultimately responsible for the instructions a player does or doesn't follow on the ground. This sets a really stupid and dangerous precedent.
I’m staggered at how they got off while Port Adelaide got fined. I’m sure there is a VIC bias after this. Something is wrong given Cameron will miss due to concussion. The AFL doesn’t have the courage to go after the bigger Vic clubs
 
Last edited:
Geelong's excuse was that they tried to get Cameron off the ground and he refused. Surely Geelong are responsible for their own players response to this?

It sets a precedent where clubs can simply ignore protocol because "the player didn't want to leave the ground"
I thought the claim was that they conducted the HIA on the ground and this is permitted in the absence of certain symptoms -"fencing response" etc. Some show had footage of the 39s the doc was on the ground.

But it did raise the conversation of what would happen if the player refused to leave, which I didn't see anyone having an answer for.
 
Interested in other people's opinions on the Jeremy Cameron situation.

Given how cautious our club has been with the McCartin brothers wellbeing it annoys the s**t out of me that the AFL gave Geelong the all clear on this.

Geelong's excuse was that they tried to get Cameron off the ground and he refused. Surely Geelong are responsible for their own players response to this?

It sets a precedent where clubs can simply ignore protocol because "the player didn't want to leave the ground". What a load of crap. The club is ultimately responsible for the instructions a player does or doesn't follow on the ground. This sets a really stupid and dangerous precedent.

The impact was significant his head bounced off the ground i was gobsmacked how on earth he stayed out there??

They prioritized winning over the health and well being of a player.
 
The impact was significant his head bounced off the ground i was gobsmacked how on earth he stayed out there??

They prioritized winning over the health and well being of a player.
And one of the best players in the league too. Shame on the AFL and Geelong
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top