- Joined
- Oct 22, 2021
- Posts
- 10,658
- Reaction score
- 19,206
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Liverpool
Agree, in stints he will be handy though all over the ground.Cool. None of that makes him a remotely good permanent forward prospect though.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

LIVE: Western Bulldogs v Adelaide - Rd 14 - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Dogs at 60% chance -- What's your tip? -- Injury Lists » -- All Rd 14 Games
Agree, in stints he will be handy though all over the ground.Cool. None of that makes him a remotely good permanent forward prospect though.
I see it as we’ll sign Hustwaite, Eyre and then what we do next is anyone’s guess.Its really hard to tell, given the match sim is barely that given the small amount of players. But I've seen more of Hustwaite in the match sim than Bytel (who seems to be playing forward- not one of the starting mids that I could see)
Once the seniors are back on Monday, we may get a better idea
Whilst I agree Johnson has potential, I don’t really see them as like for like in playing style.Dan only played 14 games in 2023, and whilst he was good, we still found a way to win the flag without him.
Obviously it would be better to have Dan. But with him going down so early, the coaches have plenty of time to work on strategy. Personally, I think this represents a tremendous opportunity for Johnson. He could be the big improver.
The reality is we don't have a like for like for Dan.Whilst I agree Johnson has potential, I don’t really see them as like for like in playing style.
McStay big body, hit packs, brings the ball to ground etc. Johnson more the traditional 3rd tall with a leap who takes floating grabs across pack rather than splitting them.
I think Krueger is the closest like for like we have for McStay. Whilst his overhead isn’t as good, he doesn’t mind doing a kamikaze into a pack and getting ball to ground.
Given pack-marks are such a rarity these days, that’s sufficient for the gameplan to be workable.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Yep. The reason we got Dan is exactly that we didn't have a player like him.The reality is we don't have a like for like for Dan.
Fly & the coaches will be working on other options.
Just like they successfully did for the GF.
Yes but the conversation has moved beyond that, and is now working out who’s best placed stylistically to play that role.The reality is we don't have a like for like for Dan.
Fly & the coaches will be working on other options.
Just like they successfully did for the GF.
It's still the same conversation. Lol.Yes but the conversation has moved beyond that, and is now working out who’s best placed stylistically to play that role.
No current season stats available
Read this as Liam McMahon, who currently is running around for Carlton’s VFL team.Don't tell me we have to bring in Liam Mcbean
Liam McBean in the SANFLRead this as Liam McMahon, who currently is running around for Carlton’s VFL team.
Pretty good when you consider he missed half the yearMcStay is destined to spend the rest of his career in the odd position of being one bad game away from being a spud and one injury away from being an irreplaceable gun.
We could do worse. He's big enough to bring the ball to ground, and he's been kicking goals like it's going out of style in state leagues for ages.Don't tell me we have to bring in Liam Mcbean
This is the exact opposite of what anyone is doing. That game should be ignored in considering him.I have no issue with Frampton the defender, or as the fill in ruck. He’s a crap forward though, and it’s bizarre that anyone would think otherwise based off a 0 goal, 2 disposal game where he acted as a decoy for the real forwards to do their work.
A lack of existent evidence? Someone doing something they’ve never done before? Are we talking about the same player, because if we are then there’s 8 years of existent evidence in a forward role that he has most definitely played before.This is the exact opposite of what anyone is doing. That game should be ignored in considering him.
I get that he doesn't have a long history of being an effective key forward - That's why we picked him up off the scrap heap for basically nothing instead of paying millions for him. Do you think most teams just have a 30 goal forward they can throw into the lineup when their starting CHF goes down?
If we're going to effectively replace McStay in 2024, it's going to be on the basis of someone doing something they've never done before, regardless of who that ends up being.
Can't let a lack of existent evidence put you off trying things in pre-season, a thing that I didn't realise was so incredibly precious until you came in, clutching your pearls at the idea that we could try some things.
He was behind a few solid players at both Port and Adelaide for the forward/ruck position. He would have been competing with Dixon and Westoff at port and an emerging Thilthorpe at adelaide. Im not a fan of him as a forward but he is at least a competitor for the spot against players like Cox and Cameron. I personally think an inform Cameron could fill the McStay role as a crash bash bring it to ground forward, with Frampton being a solid sub option.Yep, that whole preseason is definitely going to be the difference maker. Just ignore his the fact that he failed in the role at two seperate clubs over the course of 8 years.
Mon. Wed. Friday.
Should be 9am
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's already been reported we were likely to be inviting up to 2 more to trial post Xmas. (That was prior to Dan's injury)As much as I can appreciate the optimisim, not one of AJ, McInnes or Kreuger has seen a full year of action in the AFL without an injury. It'll be a task for one to step up and I guess our plan will be to rotate and fill holes.
But post-Christmas, I can almost guarantee we'll be inviting more down to train than the current lot.
Hey Jen, which one of Hustwaite and Bytel do you think the Pies will take? Either of them impressing in match sim?