goodie23
Tragic Saint
I'd love that if he was at almost any other clubI'd love to see Membery win a flag.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
I'd love that if he was at almost any other clubI'd love to see Membery win a flag.
Okay. You're just arguing for the sake of arguing.
I'd suggest the only players that are worth being the highest paid player in the AFL are those who are the best player on a top 8 team.We've only won four matches as well. Our second best player is a really good player. Ports second best player is a really good player. Sydneys second best player is a really good player. All teams on the same spot on the ladder.
I'm asking- what is it that makes him a "really good player"It's not the 'vibe'. AFL coaches think he's a really good player. But you know better...
For a lot of people AFL coaches thinking someone is a really good footballer would be enough.No, I'm arguing using observable, relatively objective metrics
I'd suggest the only players that are worth being the highest paid player in the AFL are those who are the best player on a top 8 team.
Daicos, Bontempelli, Cameron etc
If Vibes De Koning was getting to that level, he would've shown it more consistently by now. He's almost 26, not 21.
I'm asking- what is it that makes him a "really good player"
The stats don't show it
Overall Hitouts to advantage, hitouts win %, clearances, contested marks
These stats show Xerri and Gawn are clearly superior.
De Koning has posted a grand total of 4 coaches votes in Carlton wins. So he's not helping his team win games.
So what is De Koning actually doing? Other than "he looks like a good player" which is vibe.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I see it as a 1 out, 2 in scenario.I don't see why we'd be letting RoMa go if TDK turns up. The idea of bringing TDK is to have more good players, isn't it?
Not one in, one out.
Being the 2nd best player on the 12th best team is not "really good"For a lot of people AFL coaches thinking someone is a really good footballer would be enough.
I'll leave you to it.
They are actually a pleasure to watch. I have never been a Collingwood hater. I hope they win it this year.Their system seems so well drilled and really selfless. No-one is going for personal glory, they look for teammates and block and harass for each other. Geelong similar. They just know what they are meant to do and can bring in a new player and expect them to know how to play it.
Having players work into space for the kicker helps too. We seem to stand still and pressure the ball carrier into mistakes.
EFAI see it as a 1 out, 2 in scenario.
In: TDK, Bergman,Aleer
Out: Marshall.
We have the cash to spend for TDK. The Marshall trade pick results in Bergman.
The above 1 out, 2 in scenario improves our list.
Can you blame him?Zane Duursma looks frustrated at North, I reckon he has serious talent. Needs a new start. Hope we enquire.
Still waiting for you to tell us who to spend it on who won't cost draft capital.Being the 2nd best player on the 12th best team is not "really good"
Plus, he hasn't done this consistently. You're hanging your hat on less than half a season.
He's not on track to even make AA40- because at least two rucks are clearly ahead.
If that's your definition of "really good", and worth $12.5mil over 7 years, more power to you!
They are actually a pleasure to watch. I have never been a Collingwood hater. I hope they win it this year.
Tell me, exactly how much cap space will we lose if we don't spend it on Vibes?Still waiting for you to tell us who to spend it on who won't cost draft capital.
Why would it have to be one player only?The only one would be Bont. You think he will leave the Dogs?
In part yesI'm convinced that good kicking has a lot to do with confidence. Confidence from the receiver to commit to wanting the ball and obviously the confidence of the player delivering. They believe it will work.
Some of those Collingwood players are shittrucks but they all have massive confidence. It's not from their natural ability at the level.
Somehow they've built it. We need to build it as well as we're nothing like it.
It's Ethan Phillips' time to shineSo if Howard doesn’t go around again next season & this is also Cordy’s last, would we look at someone who you think would come cheap, maybe Charlie Dean?
Ex Sandringham Dragons player, who played 8 games last season but hasn’t broken into Collingwoods team this year.
Having a pretty good game in the 2’s against theDhawks
Yesterday’s newsIt's Ethan Phillips' time to shine

Pies a ooor example you’re not exactly comparing apples….can bring Houston in on lower dollars to Nth offer to keep replenished cause they play in front of 80k at G each week …..so yeah they’ve managed to do itYet clubs like Collingwood have done a bulk of list building on the cheap not going for optics. To me losing Marshall who up until this year has been a match winner and one of our few top shelf players for a guy who is promising but not elite is a dangerously arrogant move. If it backfires it looks terrible.
To me TDK is a poor kick, suffers from a similar issue to Marshall in that he can ruck but his real skill is dump kicking out of the ruck. Both my brother and brother in law are both Blues supporters and they both clam that Carlton usually play better when TDK isn't rucking. His dump kicks frustrate them as much as ours piss us off.
Taking him and Bergman is bringing in two below average ball users into an already messy side at maximum cost. Aleer is also a poor kick.
I'm not totally against TDK but they want to be very sure that he's going to be the best player in the AFL or at least the best ruck in the game to justify being the best paid player in history.
The 16hrs make me wonder if we are just trying anything to be attractiveIf Hastie was at the Cats he would already be 5kg heavier and on track to be a gun. He is an elite user, we just have painfully slow development compared to other teams.
Interstingly, father in law was around last night and we were chatting footy. He was a Cats board member for 10+ years not that long ago. He is absolutely astounded by Ross's claim we have 16 required hours at the club a week.
Cats premiership ship years was double this. Players demanded a level of excellence from each other. We are not a serious football club if blokes are legit spending 16 hours at week at work which includes tactical reviews.
It's absolutely baffling to me. Maybe our skills suck, because wtf can u actually achieve in 16 hours a week?
Wonder how it compared to Ross’ first tenure and his time at Freo?The 16hrs make me wonder if we are just trying anything to be attractive
I suspect as we eventually get closer to a challenge that 16 hours would change
We aren’t challenging now but agree it’s low
Also footy clubs have moved a bit even in last 10 years this generation isn’t the same …
Collingwood were in a position we might find ourselves in, around 3 or 4 years from nowThey did also at a similar spot to us now
Treloar started with GWS...offload Treloar (club stalwart)
Stephenson was being overpaid, as was Treloar and Grundyand Stephenson etc
They realised they made mistakes by overpaying playersso they aren’t afraid to call it when it’s needed
How about keeping our gun ruckman, continue developing Dodson, keeping Boyd for injury insurance (or finding someone else- we previously had Tom Campbell)..... and not making the 5th or 6th best ruck in the AFL the highest paid player in the AFL?Anyway it all depends what you get for Masrhall -
Highly, highly underrated post..Reminds me of this girl from high school, her name was Kate.
Hey I get it, it’s not like TDK is the player I want most in the world, I’m not sold on him as a messiah type.Yet clubs like Collingwood have done a bulk of list building on the cheap not going for optics. To me losing Marshall who up until this year has been a match winner and one of our few top shelf players for a guy who is promising but not elite is a dangerously arrogant move. If it backfires it looks terrible.
To me TDK is a poor kick, suffers from a similar issue to Marshall in that he can ruck but his real skill is dump kicking out of the ruck. Both my brother and brother in law are both Blues supporters and they both clam that Carlton usually play better when TDK isn't rucking. His dump kicks frustrate them as much as ours piss us off.
Taking him and Bergman is bringing in two below average ball users into an already messy side at maximum cost. Aleer is also a poor kick.
I'm not totally against TDK but they want to be very sure that he's going to be the best player in the AFL or at least the best ruck in the game to justify being the best paid player in history.
I'm getting to the point atm from your posts, that I hope the repeat the mistakes just to see you go off your collective banana lolCollingwood were in a position we might find ourselves in, around 3 or 4 years from now
Treloar started with GWS.
Stephenson was being overpaid, as was Treloar and Grundy
They realised they made mistakes by overpaying players
This is the exact trap St Kilda's about to fall into with Vibes De Koning
Collingwood paid for this, being forced to continue paying part of their salaries when they played for other teams
How about keeping our gun ruckman, continue developing Dodson, keeping Boyd for injury insurance (or finding someone else- we previously had Tom Campbell)..... and not making the 5th or 6th best ruck in the AFL the highest paid player in the AFL?
Can we learn from Collingwood's mistakes?
Or will we repeat them?
Yes we lose it, so tell me who we use it on?Tell me, exactly how much cap space will we lose if we don't spend it on Vibes?
You're assuming "it" must be spent, otherwise we lose "it".
How much is "it"?
Without an answer to this question, your argument lacks clarity and is moot.
Why would it have to be one player only?
Why does it have to be this year?
We're talking about a 7 year outlook.
Some unwarranted assumptions there.