- Thread starter
- #3
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

eth-dog I'm not as versed with countifs, but how do I set up the formula to count for both
"St Kilda" and "StK" I keep getting 0 as an output because I need to allow for part of the string (Say "Haw/StK") and I need to be able to add them)
Not having much luck with it.
Still returns 0 so not sure what I'm doing wrong.Easiest way is to just make it a sum, i.e.
=COUNTIFS([Insert formula searching for St Kilda])+COUNTIFS([Insert formula searching for Stk])
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
F$370,""&"St Kilda"&"",$F$2
F$370,""&"Brisbane"&"")
Yes I did change it but it still won't let me do it with countifs, It's just easier to individually do them with countif.You mean exactly what I suggested doing?![]()
Thanks. I used StK surrounded by asterix to do all instances but I seem to be missing one so might have a case sensitive entry there somewher.Think the biggest issue is that column F looks like it has a lot of variations. What you might be wanting to do if I understand you is count if a cell contains, but isn't limited to, St Kilda, for example. In which case you'd need to adjust your wording to be =COUNTIFS($F$2F$370,""&"St Kilda"&"",$F$2
F$370,""&"Brisbane"&"")
Might not need the speech marks around St Kilda and Brisbane, so try both.
BTW, I've sent Isaac Heeney to the Dockers.Hang on just realised why it didn't work. COUNTIFS is a multiple criteria function, it means you were asking Excel to count all instances of column F being simultaneously St Kilda and Brisbane which is impossible, so of course it would return 0.
What you wanted to do is count if column F is St Kilda OR Brisbane. Which is why my initial suggestion of summing two count functions together made most sense.
You can't use COUNTIFS as if each criteria is a separate count, because COUNTIFS isn't just going to sum up all the criteria, it needs all criteria to be solved to count as 1 and it then counts up all the times all those criteria are met.
What?BTW, I've sent Isaac Heeney to the Dockers.
BTW, I've sent Isaac Heeney to the Dockers.
You fix it?Ahhh eth-dog
I'm doing my head in trying to work out why Gold Coast has incorrect numbering and there's an errant space at the end of the title. haha. Got me there.
There were a number of back flankers I could've gone for, but I couldn't ignore the sheer drive and territory Lumumba would give this team. Moving the ball at speed to our threats up forward is a priority. Attack sometimes the best form of defence in this line up. I also don't simply want a team bursting with current day players when I have options for suitable alternatives.
Team so far
FB: Stewart Frawley --
HB: Lumumba Sicily --
C: Hannebery Goodwin Embley
HF: -- Pavlich Deledio
FF: -- Hogan C.Cameron
FOL: -- Selwood Harvey
Exactly and in reality a lot of these half back flanker types who only had one official AA selection still had a good few years at a similar level. Lumumba was a sizeable component of that swarming Collingwood team that could turn defence into attack in a split second. You need a couple of players like him who can burst through congestion or receive a handball and get territory gained quickly. If you have strong contested players and crumbers ahead of the ball it works.Yes I think recency bias is a real thing. So easy to forget a player that retired in 2013 or something but had very good, but not great career.