Remove this Banner Ad

Traded #22: Jake Carlisle - Pt.1 - Traded with some other stuff for pick 5, 24 and a Bird (cont in Part 2)

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Can we please stay serious, pick 5 is so much better than 15 and 18 and you all know it.

I hope like hell 5 isn't on the table but don't let your current frustration with St Kilda cloud your judgement, you look silly trying to state that you'd rather two picks.
 
Can we please stay serious, pick 5 is so much better than 15 and 18 and you all know it.

I hope like hell 5 isn't on the table but don't let your current frustration with St Kilda cloud your judgement, you look silly trying to state that you'd rather two picks.

Obviously it is, but we're not giving up our second rounders for it. I would be happy with 1 being given personally, but not 2.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Can we please stay serious, pick 5 is so much better than 15 and 18 and you all know it.

I hope like hell 5 isn't on the table but don't let your current frustration with St Kilda cloud your judgement, you look silly trying to state that you'd rather two picks.
Yeah sure.

But what St Kilda offered is not even close to 15+18.
 
Can we please stay serious, pick 5 is so much better than 15 and 18 and you all know it.

I hope like hell 5 isn't on the table but don't let your current frustration with St Kilda cloud your judgement, you look silly trying to state that you'd rather two picks.
You look silly asking for two second round picks in addition to Carlisle.

You haven't offered pick 5 on its own otherwise the deal would be done.
 
Agree that Hawthorn's offer is better than St Kildas. Hawks is fair, saints is obvious unders, clearly trying to exploit Carlisle's preference as far as it can go. I'm sure most clubs would do the same thing if situations were reversed.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Agree that Hawthorn's offer is better than St Kildas. Hawks is fair, saints is obvious unders, clearly trying to exploit Carlisle's preference as far as it can go. I'm sure most clubs would do the same thing if situations were reversed.
The thing is clubs generally get a deal done for unders because that's the best they can offer whereas St. Kilda have the means to get a deal done but they refuse to.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Agree that Hawthorn's offer is better than St Kildas. Hawks is fair, saints is obvious unders, clearly trying to exploit Carlisle's preference as far as it can go. I'm sure most clubs would do the same thing if situations were reversed.
Most clubs would have just done the fair deal and took the player. Saints have trashed their reputation and gone some way toward redeeming ours.
 
Can we please stay serious, pick 5 is so much better than 15 and 18 and you all know it.

I hope like hell 5 isn't on the table but don't let your current frustration with St Kilda cloud your judgement, you look silly trying to state that you'd rather two picks.
Well actually pick 15, 18, 23 and 25 are better than 5 and 41.
 
Can we please stay serious, pick 5 is so much better than 15 and 18 and you all know it.

I hope like hell 5 isn't on the table but don't let your current frustration with St Kilda cloud your judgement, you look silly trying to state that you'd rather two picks.

I'd rather those two picks and 23, 25.

Your club is a joke. Rightfully told to stick it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top